The All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks (AUCPB), inheriting Bolshevik principles of the R.S.D.W.P. -R.S.D.W.P.(b) - A.U.C.P.(b) - of Lenin's policiy in the CPSU, is the highest form of proletarian class organisation, advanced detachment of the working class, acting in unity with the peasantry and labour intelligentsia, standing on the Party's positions for: the gain of political power - overthrowing the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie and establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat, the destruction of private ownership over the instuments and means of production, the revival of the USSR, the further strenghtening of the proletarian interests for the complete victory of socialism and gradual transition to communism. The ideological and theoretical basis of the AUCPB is formed by Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, is their doctrine in its creative application and development in modern conditions. The AUCPB is a component of the global communist movement with the aim of communism triumphing over the whole planet.

Wednesday, 26 November 2014

For Bolshevism - No 12 (141) December 2014

For Bolshevism Inside the Communist and Workers’ Movement No 12 (141) December 2014

On November 8, 1991, 23 years ago, our AUCPB – All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks was formed
The All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks was formed on November 8, 1991 at the height of anti-communist hysteria. The founding congress was held in Leningrad on a semi-legal footing. The founders of the party declared their inheritance of revolutionary traditions and a complete break with the anti-peoples policies of the opportunist leadership of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU), which began the destruction of the socialist system, the collapse of the country and the elimination of party created by Lenin. The revival of the AUCPB was prepared by the activities of the All-Union Society "Unity - for Leninism and Communist ideals" (Yedinstvo), formed in May 1989, and the Bolshevik Party platform, established in July 1991 (disbanded in connection with the establishment of AUCPB).
In its social base, goals, objectives, structure, forms and methods of struggle, the AUCPB is a party of the Leninist type serving as the political vanguard of the working class and its socialist allies, an organization of like-minded Communists, opposing the bourgeois counter-revolution and the opportunists of the former CPSU. Strongly criticizing the revisionist decisions of the XXVIII Congress of the CPSU, the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks does not liken to the German generals dumping all the blame on Hitler for the crimes, destruction and war, and does not shut off the reasons for the counterrevolution just on the betrayal by Gorbachev and his associates, but starts out from the fact that, without the increasing from the end of the 50s in the party and in the country of objective and subjective prerequisites for capitulation, Gorbachev's perestroika would have been impossible which then cleared the way for the coming to power of the mafia bourgeoisie. Therefore the AUCPB is attacked by both the anti-peoples regime, and the partocrats who are potential allies of today restorers of capitalism.
The methodology of social and political knowledge and action by the AUCPB is Marxism-Leninism, scientifically substantiating the historic mission of the international working class, which is to create a society that knows no exploitation, oppression, war, violence against the person and the masses, social inequality and social injustice. In other words, Marxism-Leninism is regarded as the revolutionary experience of the working class and the builders of socialism in different countries, taken in its general theoretical and methodological terms.
The AUCPB rejects the subjectively opportunistic approach in assessing the historical individual, but comes from the fact that the main criterion of significance of historical activity is the compliance of the carrying out of policy by this individual to the objective laws of functioning and development of society. Compliance, which is directly implemented in the socio-economic, political, cultural and scientific progress in improving the quality of life of the masses. In this regard, the party strongly rejects the anti-Leninist campaign, anti-Stalinist hysteria, and all rabid anti-communism unleashed by the restorers of capitalism and their ideology.
The Bolshevik Party comes not only from the need to eliminate private ownership of the means of production, as a source of appropriation of unpaid labour by the exploiters of the manufacturers, but also from the insolvency of anarcho-syndicalist recipes about the transfer of public property over to individual production teams. This in a capitalist market becomes a stepping-stone to its privatization and transformation into private property. The AUCPB stands for the sovereignty of the Soviet system as the form of the state of the working class and its allies (the dictatorship of the proletariat). The Bolsheviks come from the fact that during the period of restoration of capitalism, all factions of the bourgeoisie, initially anti-socialist and social-democratic under communist "guise" are potential allies of the restorative regime, its last refuge, reserve and hope.
The AUCPB believes that in conditions of the so very far advanced restoration of capitalism, today it is utopian to expect that election campaigns and parliamentary factions can end the reactionary power. In the context of the growing threat of authoritarianism in the "sovereign states", hopes on "palace coups" are in vain. To reverse the restorative process, a second socialist revolution is needed with the participation of workers and the general use of all forms and methods of struggle which the forces of counter-revolution would impose. Only a party of the revolutionary struggle can successfully organize and direct the anti-restorative struggle of the masses for power, and not a party of parliamentary reform. The strategic line of policy should be to merge the struggle for socialism with peoples mass action for the mighty Soviet Union and the survival of the working people. Outside-parliamentary forms of struggle play the leading role, such as the politicization of strikes and a general political strike.
According to Lenin: "A revolution can neither be made nor set up in a queue. One cannot place revolution on order – a revolution grows. "(VI Lenin, PSS, t.31, p. 398); "It is impossible to predict the course of the revolution ... it is impossible to call for one. You can only work towards bringing about revolution "(Vol. 36, p. 458)," Universal belief in revolution is already the beginning of the revolution "(Vol. 9, p.159). According to Marx: "Not one revolution can be carried out by a party, as it is carried out only by the people." (Marx and Engels. Op. Vol. 45, p. 475).
Speaking for the unification of the communists, the AUCPB asserts the fact that this unification should not have a formal, apical character. From unity of action of parties and organizations arising on the ruins of the CPSU we need move towards unity of their policies and further more - towards a united Marxist-Leninist party of the working class. The strength of the communists lies not just in their unity, but in their intransigence towards opportunism.
The AUCPB has a foreign policy platform and is actively cooperating in the international workers' and communist movement. In Greece, Belgium, Germany, Syria, the DPRK, Brazil, India, the Netherlands, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and in our country, representatives of the Central Committee of the AUCPB have been negotiating with the leaders and many delegations of communist and revolutionary parties, met with heads of state and various social movements. The AUCPB constantly interacts with the revolutionary communist organizations in Great Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Spain, Bulgaria and others. The program and charter of the AUCPB is published in the communist press of many countries.
One can become more familiar with the materials of the party and our practical activity in the relevant section on the website



Challenges of the XXI Century
What we see today in Ukraine, can be considered the result of a long-term, targeted and well-planned operation. Work on implementation in the mid-1950s, and even before, when the nationalists in the higher, middle and lower management level, began in Western Ukraine, and then the whole of the Ukrainian SSR. With their help, in Western Ukraine was carefully prepared and increased the anti-Soviet, and, in fact, Russophobe "soil", which afterwards, by the weakening of the Soviet Union and, accordingly, the control functions of the Centre began to spread in other Ukrainian regions.
And the introduction of Ukrainian nationalists in the Communist Party and the further advance in their careers began in the 1920s.
Thus, in a message of the chief of the 4th HQ the NKVD of the USSR Sudoplatov, to deputy chief of the 3rd HQ of the NKVD of the USSR Ilyushin from December 5, 1942 (№ 7 / C / 97), "... after the defeat of Petliurism...... the active Petliurists went deep underground, and only in 1921 were legalized and entered the Ukrainian Communist Party (UKP) and used the legal possibilities for enhancing nationalist work ... These people with the arrival of the German occupiers in Ukraine were at the service of the Germans." Obviously, in the last decade of Stalin (1944-1953) penetrating the party and state bodies of Ukraine by nationalist "zapadentsev" was, to put it mildly, difficult. But then ....
Rehabilitation in 1955, on the initiative of Khrushchev, meant persons who had collaborated with the Nazi occupiers during World War II, according to many experts, opened the valve to the "political naturalization" and return to Ukraine of former fascist OUN fighters, then later in considerable numbers repainted themselves as Komsomols and Communists.
And indeed they returned from exile not "pro-Soviet." According to a number of North American and West German sources (including those that existed in 1950 - early 1970 of the Munich Institute for the Study of the USSR and Eastern Europe), no less than one third of Ukrainian nationalists and their families rehabilitated in the middle to the second half of 1950., became by the mid-1970s heads of district committees, regional committees, local regional/district or executive committees in Western, Central and South-Western Ukraine. And also – they became leaders of various ranks in many Ukrainian ministries, departments, enterprises, social organizations and the Komsomol, including at regional level.
According to the same estimates, as well as archival documents of local party organs, in the early 1980s, in the general contingent of regional party committees and districts of Lviv region, the proportion of persons of Ukrainian nationality, rehabilitated in 1955-1959 years., and returnees exceeded 30%; in Party organs at Volyn, Ivano-Frankivsk and Ternopil regions, the figure was 35% to 50%.
A parallel process developed from outside too, since from mid-1955, Ukrainians returned from abroad. And, in the 1955-1958 biennium returned, in general, no less than 50 thousand of them, and in the following 10-15 years - about another 50 thousand on top of that had returned.
And interestingly, the exiled OUN fighters in the 1940s - early 1950s succeeded, for the most part, to establish themselves at the gold mines in the Urals, Siberia and the Far East. Therefore they returned to Ukraine with large sums of money.
The immigrants from other countries were certainly not poor either. And almost immediately on returning, the exiles and the majority of returnees were buying houses with plots of land or building their own sites, or "embedding" themselves in expensive at the time housing cooperatives.
Obviously, after Khrushchev's 1955 rehabilitation, the OUN leadership and other nationalist cordoned structures adopted decisions in 1955-1956 on the gradual introduction of party and government structures of the Ukrainian SSR. It was noted that there were would be no insurmountable obstacles on the part of local authorities. In short, the nationalists changed tactics, and became fully supportive of "pro-Western" anti-Soviet dissidents in Ukraine, and skilfully embedded in the public consciousness the chauvinistic assessment and appeals through the media and publishing outlets of the Ukrainian SSR. According to historian and political scientist Klim Dmitruk, these activities were supervised by intelligence agents of the West. Moreover, in the Soviet Union they did not dare to greatly "push" on the Eastern European countries through the territory of which (except maybe Romania) into Ukraine from abroad continued to penetrate former OUN members and a new, more prepared, nationalists.
The Ukrainian leadership, again, directly or indirectly encouraged these trends. For example, at a meeting of the Politburo on October 21, 1965, a draft project of the Central Committee of the Communist Party was discussed, initiated by the head of the Communist Party of Ukraine Petro Shelest, on granting Ukraine the right to independently participate in foreign trade activities. No other union republic did this. The mere appearance of such an odious draft project shows that the leadership of the Ukrainian SSR was actually promoting "promising" ideas of the conspiratorial nationalists.
According to some estimates, had the project been a success, then the same demands by the Baltic and Transcaucasian republics would follow.
Therefore, Moscow did not consider it necessary to meet the demand of Kiev, although the proposal was supported by a native of Poltava, the head of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR N.V. Podgorny. Moreover, according to the memoirs of A.I. Mikoyan, then Shelest did not just "put in his place", but struck him off the list of "friends of Brezhnev." However, even after that, the influence of "the Ukrainian group" in the Kremlin remained significant, and Shelest was removed from office only six years later, and Podgorny – 11 years later.
Meanwhile, back in September 1965, the Central Committee of the CPSU received an anonymous letter: "... In Ukraine, the atmosphere is ever more heating up on the basis of the national question, in connection with the desire of some people in Kiev to introduce a so-called Ukrainisation of schools and universities ... Is it not clear to the Central Committee of the CPSU that any violation of the status quo, but more so in this matter in Ukraine, will cause hostility between Russian and Ukrainians and excite very many base passions in favour and the demands of Canadian Ukrainians? .. ". But even an analysis of this "signal", we note that this did not lead to the dismissal of Shelest.
In addition, the "returnees" had no real obstacles put in their way for their entry into the Komsomol or communist party. True, some of them had to change the names, but that was certainly a small price to pay for moving up the career ladder.
At the initiative of Shelest in the late 1960s, a mandatory exam in Ukrainian language in Ukrainian humanities and many technical colleges was secretly introduced, which, incidentally, was welcomed by many media of the Ukrainian diaspora in North America, Germany, Australia, Argentina. They believed that this order would suspend the "Russification" and Sovietization of Ukraine. Subsequently, this decision was "had the brakes applied", but even after that, many teachers demanded of applicants, students and applicants seeking academic titles, especially in western Ukraine, to take exams on the Ukrainian language.
And from about the mid-1970s, in connection with the further strengthening of the position of Ukrainian (especially the Brezhnev-Dnipropetrovsk) clan in the top leadership of the USSR and the CPSU, naturalization of nationalists became almost uncontrollable. This soft in general attitude of the leadership of Ukraine within we emphasize only the post-Stalin period, contributed towards the growth of nationalist tendencies in the country. And the replacement of Shelest by Shcherbitsky resulted only in a more subtle development of nationalism, in very sophisticated, one might even say, in Jesuit ways.
Well, what would seem to be wrong, in particular, with a growing number of schools with teaching in Russian language or the number of media outlets, including radio and television programs in Russian? And that literature in Russian quickly began to grow in circulation? However, this caused latent discontent in nationalist circles of Ukraine, and contributed to strengthening of such sentiments in society.
However, according to the research group Internet- portal of the CIS, Ukraine continued to be in a privileged position compared to the RSFSR, which did not even have its own Academy of Sciences unlike Ukrainian and other Soviet republics.
Under Shelest, who headed in 1963 the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine, more Ukrainian-language literature and periodicals were published, and this process began in 1955. In official and other events, the authorities advised speakers to speak in Ukrainian. In this case, the number of members in the CPU during the years 1960-1970 increased to a record high- in comparison with the growth of the number of members of the Communist Parties of other union republics, by nearly 1 million members.
Pro-Western nationalist dissent in Ukraine activly developed and, at least a third of activists were, again, former OUN members. In the Lviv and Ivano-Frankivsk regions in the late 1950s, underground groups emerged like the "Ukrainian worker-peasant union", the "group of lawyers and historians", and "Nezalyezhnost". They discussed the options of de-Sovietization of Ukraine and its secession from the USSR. And in February 1963 at a conference on culture and the Ukrainian language in the University of Kiev, some participants proposed that the Ukrainian be the state language. Appropriate measures in respect of such groups in the Ukraine were not used. It turns out that the adherents to the promotion of Ukraine "independence" were also in the leadership of the KGB of the USSR.
In this regard, it is noteworthy that the leader of the Melnyks (last name of the leader of one faction of the OUN - A. Melnyk) A. Kaminsky in 1970 published in the USA and Canada bulky books "for the modern concept of the Ukrainian revolution." It could be obtained through booksellers in many cities of Ukraine, on the book bazaars, in societies of book lovers and foreign correspondents. As stated by A. Kaminski, "national revolution in Ukraine is quite possible, and it should be prepared. And this no longer requires (no longer requires! – ed. I.L.) underground structures ... In order to unite the people against the Soviet regime, there are already enough evolutionary possibilities." And the basis of a line for such a revolution is to be "preservation of our own language, culture, national identity, the love of our people, and traditions." And with the "skilful use of the international and domestic situation, one can count on success ...".
Therefore the Melnyks and Banderites around the mid-1960s abandoned their former main underground struggle, and reoriented themselves, according to expert estimates by the Internet-portal of the CIS and a number of other sources, towards tactical considerations to support Ukrainian dissent in all its forms and manifestations. Especially in support of the inspired by the West "protection of human rights in the USSR", in which very cleverly included nationalistic overtones. In any case, the mediocre artist in Ukraine, and not only there, often became widely advertised as a "prisoner of conscience" and received no less a spectacular western "label" of the same kind.
Development of these trends contributed to the fact that the ideas of Russophobian "independence", even if in that period, not publicly, were shared by a considerable number of Ukrainian party functionaries.
The entire Soviet period in Ukraine is almost a merging of the nationalist movement with the party apparatus.
And since a considerable number of its representatives stems from the OUN movement, this secret alliance, ultimately proved successful. For nationalists and their Western patrons, of course. In this regard, what is remarkable is the creation in the 1970s - early 1980s. of Soviet export gas pipelines mainly in the Ukrainian SSR. Many media outlets the of Ukrainian diaspora in that period also later noted that with Ukraine gaining "independence", the country will be able to dictate its own terms to Russia and keep it on a strong "hook". Today they are making another such attempt, but, as before, nothing hardly worthwhile will come out of this "independence"...

Igor Leonidov
Material by Igor Leonidov has previously been published on http://www.stoletie.ru/territoriya_istorii/polzuchij_nacizm_944.htm

Note from the AUCPB editors:
In the 20's, early 30's, ukrainization "strolled" around Ukraine when Russians, in fact, were forcibly registered as Ukrainians. This process was led then by 1st Secretary of the Communist Party of Ukraine Stanislav Kosior, the predecessor to this post of Khrushchev. In the late 30's, he was executed as an enemy of the people. Material on this period of history of Ukraine, we will be publishing at a later date.

November 7, 2014 marked the 97 anniversary of the Great October Socialist Revolution on November 7 (October 25), 1917
For the first time in the history of the world, the working class, the toiling masses of Russia under the leadership of the Bolshevik Party, led by Vladimir Ilyich Lenin overthrew the power of the landlords and capitalists, took power into their own hands and began to build a socialist society.
But the overthrown classes could not accept their defeat and unleashed a civil war against its own people. To their aid came their class brothers – the armies of 14 imperialist states that invaded the young Soviet republic, trying to drown in blood the state of workers and peasants.
The young Red Army, established in the February days of 1918 with the support of all the people, was able to defeat the forces of intervention, and expel them from the borders of our country. There was also a victory won over the troops of internal counterrevolution – The White Guard, Petliurists and the like.
On December 30, 1922, four independent Soviet socialist states - the RSFSR (Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic), USSR (Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic), Belorussian (Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic) and TSFSR (Transcaucasian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic within Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia ) formed the world's first multinational state of workers and peasants - the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
The building of socialism in our country took place in a very complex international and domestic situation, in a fierce class struggle. The departing from the historical arena exploiting classes of landlords and capitalists could not accept defeat and put up furious resistance to socialist transformation.
But the vast majority of workers and peasants, the working masses of the Land of the Soviets rallied around the CPSU (b) - All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), which was headed by the successor and continuer of Lenin - Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin, implemented successful leadership of socialist construction.
In short historical periods of time, industrialization, collectivization of agriculture and the Cultural Revolution were implemented. And by the end of the 30s the Soviet Union became the second nation in the world in economic power and Ukraine on economic potential had reached the level of France and became one of the most advanced countries of Europe.
An important test of the strength of Soviet power (the dictatorship of the proletariat) and the socialist transformation was the Great Patriotic War and German fascism that was unleashed against our country.
World capitalism could not accept the fact that in one of the largest countries in the world, in power were the working classes and took all measures towards the destruction of the socialist state.
The biggest monopoly corporations and banks of the main imperialist powers of the planet - the US, Britain, France, belonging to Zionist capital, and their considerable financial investments contributed to the revival of large German industrial recovery of the armed forces of Germany, defeated in World War I which contributed to Hitler and the Nazis coming to power . Their goal was to incite the fascists at the hands of the Nazis against the Soviet Union to destroy socialism in our country, and break up the Soviet Union into separate national splinters, turning them into their own colonial appendages.
However, the second military campaign of the imperialist West against the USSR ended in failure.
Hitler hoped that the Soviet Union, a multinational state of workers and peasants, "a colossus with feet of clay" and under the first blow of the fascist hordes would crumble like a house of cards.
But the friendship and brotherhood of the peoples of the USSR, freed from exploitation and oppression, became one cementing force that blocked the way to the fascists. The Soviet people, one and all, rallied around the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, led by Generalissimo Stalin, defeated the Nazis, defeating the enemy and hoisted the red flag of victory over the ruined Reichstag in Berlin.
The Great Patriotic War, which began June 22, 1941 with the treacherous attack on our country, ended with the complete defeat and unconditional surrender of the Nazis. May 9, 1945 became the popular Victory Day over Fascism.
The Soviet Army also fulfilled its international duty, freeing the peoples of Europe from fascist slavery in which they were in during the early years of the Second World War. Then, true to its alliance commitments by the coalition, the Soviet Union declared war against militarist Japan, defeating the million-strong Kwantung Army in 23 days, thus putting an end to the Second World War, which lasted 6 years and one day (September 1, 1939 - September 2, 1945 .), and which claimed 50 million lives.
In the earliest historical period, by the end of the 40s, the ruined economy of our country was restored and the Soviet Union continued, interrupted by the war on the path of building a communist society. The huge undeniable advantages of socialism emerged and in the conquest of outer space - the launch of the first artificial Earth satellite (04/10/1957), and the first manned space flight, which was a citizen of the Land of Soviets Yuri Gagarin (04.12.1961); in the development and peaceful use of nuclear energy - the first nuclear power plant was put into operation in the country (1954), as well as the launching of the first nuclear-powered icebreaker "Lenin" (1957).
Unable to defeat our country in military campaigns, the imperialists then moved to the "cold war" with aims to destroy the USSR and put an end to socialism from within. An unprecedented hitherto arms race was unleashed.
Unfortunately, after the death of J.V. Stalin in our party and state was not found a person worthy of the great predecessors and associated daunting task of building a communist society. Having seized power in the party and the country, the neo-Trotskyist Khrushchev leadership unleashed a slanderous anti-Stalin campaign, which marked the beginning of the return of socio-economic and political processes that formed the basis of degeneration of the Communist Party and the proletarian socialist state, and laid the ideological, political and economic foundations of capitalist restoration in the USSR.
The treacherous Gorbachev leadership under the guise of restructuring (perestroika) carried out the bourgeois counterrevolution, which resulted in the USSR and the socialist camp being destroyed, and socialism suffering a temporary setback.

* * *

The success of the Great October Socialist Revolution was the natural result of profound contradictions, shaking capitalism at its highest imperialist stage.
Even the first scientific works of Marxism the "Communist Manifesto" by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels noted the cyclical nature of capitalism, when the rapid rise and growth of the productive forces is replaced by crisis, stoppage and destruction of production, mass unemployment, hunger and poverty of the vast masses of the working people. The crisis of capitalism is itself caused by its own inner nature - the contradiction between the social character of production and the private form of appropriation of the results of work on the basis of private ownership of the means of production, in other words, the contradiction between labour and capital.
Marx and Engels write about this noting that for several decades, the history of industry and commerce is but the history of the revolt of modern productive forces against modern conditions of production, against the property relations that are the conditions of existence of the bourgeoisie and of its rule. Suffice to mention the commercial crises that by their periodical return, ever more menacing, questions the existence of the entire bourgeois society.
Which way do the bourgeoisie get over these crises? On the one hand, by enforced destruction of a mass of productive forces, on the other hand, by the conquest of new markets, and by the more thorough exploitation of the old ones. What follows? The fact that it is preparing a more extensive and more destructive crisis and diminishing the means to counter them.
The main condition for the existence and domination of the bourgeois class is the accumulation of wealth in the hands of private individuals, the forming and increase in capital. The condition for capital is wage-labour. Wage labour rests exclusively on competition between the labourers. The advance of industry, whose involuntary promoter is the bourgeoisie, resistance being futile, makes isolation of workers competition by their revolutionary combination of association. Thus, with the development of large-scale industry from under the feet of the bourgeoisie sees the very basis on which it produces and appropriates products. It produces primarily its own gravedigger. Its death and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable.
In the "Communist Manifesto," the founders of scientific communism highlight the main issues of vital activity of contemporary bourgeois society and outlined the main objectives and challenges faced by the Communist Party and the proletariat as a whole. They noted that "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles."
"But every class struggle is a political struggle," ie, a struggle for power.
"The immediate aim of the Communists: the formation of the proletariat into a class, the overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy and conquest of political power by the proletariat."
Here Marx and Engels formed major conclusions: "The Communists may express their theory in a single sentence: The abolition of private property."
Marx and Engels believed that because of the relatively uniform nature of the development of capitalism in the pre-monopoly era, the proletarian revolution would happen around the same time in most of the developed capitalist countries.
However, with the advent of the era of imperialism - the highest and final stage of capitalism and the intensification of uneven, spasmodic development of the capitalist countries, Lenin, in preparing the working-class party for socialist revolution, came to the conclusion (see. his work "On the Slogan of the United States of Europe" and "The Military Programme of the Proletarian Revolution ") that in the period of imperialism, revolution can happen in several or even in one country, the country that is currently the weakest link in the chain of imperialist states.
The Bolsheviks were at that time, during the First World War, the only party in the world, to remain faithful to its revolutionary duty, loyalty to the decisions of the prewar international socialist congresses - to use the crisis generated by the First World War for the revolutionary overthrow of the ruling classes (their governments - in tsarist Russia) to destroy the power of capital and the establishment of power (dictatorship) of the proletariat.
"In the event of war - wrote Lenin, referring to the resolution of the Stuttgart Congress (1907) and the Basle Manifesto (1912) - Socialists must take advantage of its" economic and political crisis "to" hasten the downfall of capitalism ", ie . use the war difficulties of the governments and indignation of the masses for the carrying out of socialist revolution "("Socialism and War", PSS, t.26, str.319-320).
Lenin and the Bolshevik Party were accused of "defeatism", and the Bolshevik faction of the RSDLP, was prosecuted by the tsarist government for its refusal to vote for war credits, and for calling for the defeat of tsarism in this war. Bolsheviks were sent to hard labour in Siberia, but that did not change their revolutionary principles – to use the crisis caused by the war, for the revolutionary overthrow of tsarism and to destroy the power of capital.
"The European war - said Lenin - is the greatest historical crisis, the beginning of a new era. Like any crisis, the war has deeply aggravated the contradictions and brought them to the surface, having cast off the entire hypocritical veil, throwing off all conventions, destroying the rotten or already rotten authorities" ("Dead chauvinism and living socialism ", PSS, t.26, str.102-103 ).
"A revolutionary class in a reactionary war can not but wish for the defeat of its government, can not see the connection between its military failures and the facilitating of its overthrow" (VI Lenin, "Socialism and War", PSS, t.26, str.327) . "Socialists must explain to the masses that for them there is no salvation outside of the revolutionary overthrow of "their own" governments and the difficulties that these governments in the present war should be used for this purpose" (ibid).
And the Bolsheviks advanced the slogan of turning the imperialist war into a civil war.
"The transformation of the modern imperialist war into a civil war is the only correct proletarian slogan shown by the experience of the Paris Commune, noted by the Basel (1912) resolution and all the conditions arising from the imperialist war between highly developed bourgeois countries" (Lenin, "War and Russian Social-Democracy ", PSS, t.26, p. 22).
In the same period, Lenin formulated the basic features of a revolutionary situation: "We will not be mistaken if we mention the following three main features: 1) the inability of the ruling classes to maintain its unchanged rule; or a crisis of the "uppers", a crisis on the policy of the ruling class, which creates a crack, which is filled by the discontent and indignation of the oppressed classes. For a revolution, it is usually not enough for the "lower classes not wanting to live the old way ", but still requires that the "upper classes can not" rule in the old way. 2) Aggravation, above normal, deprivation and misery of the oppressed classes. 3) A significant increase on the basis of the first two reasons, in the activity of the masses, in a "peaceful" epoch allowing themselves to be robbed quietly, and in turbulent times, are drawn both by all the circumstances of the crisis, and by the "uppers" into independent historical action. "Without these objective changes, independent of the will not only of individual groups and parties, but individual classes, a revolution - as a general rule - is impossible. The totality of these objective changes is called a revolutionary situation "(" The collapse of the II International ", PSS, t.26, str.218-219).
At the same time Lenin pointed out that "from not every revolutionary situation arises revolution, but only from a situation in which the above-mentioned objective changes are accompanied by a subjective factor, namely, the ability of the revolutionary class to take revolutionary mass action strong enough to break (or dislocate) the old government, which will never, even in a period of crisis, "fall", if it is not "toppled" (ibid, str.219).
Speaking about the tasks of socialists (as Bolsheviks at the time called themselves), caused by the war, Lenin formulated them as follows: "... no socialist no matter where or when ever took warranty for namely this war (not a future war) for bringing about revolution, namely today’s (and not tommorrow’s) revolutionary situation. Here in question is the indisputable and fundamental duty of all socialists: the duty to reveal to the masses the presence of a revolutionary situation, explain its width and depth, awaken the revolutionary consciousness of the proletariat and revolutionary determination, to help them move towards revolutionary action and create organizations relevant to the revolutionary situation to work in this direction "(ibid, str.221).
Even after the completion of the revolution and civil war, Lenin in " Left-Wing" Communism: An Infantile Disorder" formulated the basic law of the revolution: "The Basic Law of the revolution, vindicated by all revolutions and in particular all three Russian revolutions in the twentieth century, is this: for revolution, it is not enough just for the exploited and oppressed masses to realize the impossibility of living in the old way and demand changes; for a revolution, it is necessary that the exploiters should not be able to live and rule in the old way. Only when the "lowers" do not want the old, and when the "uppers" can not rule in the old way that the revolution can win. This truth is expressed in the words: revolution is impossible without a national (and the affected exploited and the exploiters) crisis. Hence, for revolution, it is necessary, firstly, to ensure that the majority of workers (or at least most of the conscious, thinking, politically active workers) should fully understand the need for revolution and is ready to die for it; secondly, that the ruling classes experience a government crisis, which draws into politics even the most backward masses (a sign of any real revolution: the rapid increase by tenfold or even a hundred times the number of people capable of political struggle by representatives of workers and oppressed masses, hitherto apathetic), thereby weakens the government and makes it possible for the revolutionaries to overthrow it rapidly "(MSS, t.41, str.69-70).

On the current situation, and use of the experience of the revolutionary struggle of Lenin.
Like a hundred years ago, the world remains on the verge of a world war.
War is the direct continuation of the policy of the ruling classes conducted by them in the decades before the war, and arise from the very nature of imperialism itself.
"War is the continuation of politics by other (ie: violent) means." "This famous statement - said Lenin in the already mentioned work" Socialism and War "- belongs to one of the most profound writers on military matters, Clausewitz. Marxists have always rightly regarded this provision as a theoretical basis of views on the meaning of every war "(MSS, t.26, p. 316).
After the destruction of the Soviet Union, the destruction of the Soviet Army and the United Armed Forces of the Warsaw Pact countries, US-NATO imperialism had no obstacles in their way towards world domination.
It should not be forgotten that in the US-NATO block, US imperialism plays a decisive role, and the rest of the countries of NATO play a supporting role, are an instrument of Zionist-American capital in its struggle for the establishment of complete world domination.
From this perspective, we must consider the events in Ukraine last winter, which resulted in the coming to power (or rather, put in power by American directors of Maidan) of the Zionist group of capital, fully controlled by their American masters and managed by them.
At the service of the Zionist Poroshenko-Yatsenuk-Turchinova regime are the National Fascist Bandera groups led by Tyagnibok and Yarosh used for the dirtiest bloody work for nationalist stupefying the masses and pitting two fraternal peoples in internecine slaughter.
the US by and large, does not need Ukraine. Our country, the working people of Ukraine are the pawns of US imperialism in its struggle for the seizure, the conquest and colonization of Russia, for the possession of its natural resources and raw materials and turning Russian workers into slaves of transnational corporations and banks.
Only by way of unleashing new wars and military conflicts, by way of seizing new countries and the enslavement of peoples, US imperialism, Western imperialism in general sees a way out of the crisis, which the world capitalist system plunged into.
The US foreign debt is bloated, the dollar threatens loss as the main reserve currency of the world, as a means of exploitation and enslavement of peoples, pumping out the national wealth and natural resources of most countries of the world.
To somehow postpone its inevitable collapse due to deepening contradictions between the rapidly developing modern productive forces remaining and outlived capitalist relations of production standing in the way, US imperialism needs Russia, its oil and gas, and its cheap labour.
In late September, in the traditional Saturday address to Americans, President Barack Obama once again made a statement about "Russian aggression" against which he is now going to unite the whole world: "America is leading the efforts to unite the entire world against Russian aggression in the Ukraine. Together with our allies, we will support the people of Ukraine in the development of democracy and the economy. "Obama also recalled his speech at the UN on September 24: "This week I turned to yet more countries to join us on the right side of history." Speaking at the UN, Obama said Russia's actions in the Ukraine are among the principal threats to peace. In the first place, Obama talked of Ebola, and secondly - Russia, which, according to the head of the White House, plays a too aggressive role in Ukraine and can break the "world order", and in the next place among the main threats to Obama were the militants of "Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. "
The history of war shows that the aggressor always blamed the future victim of aggression in its policies being carried out. Lies and slander, as Lenin pointed out when making his analysis of the First World War, the ruling classes use to fool, deceive the masses, and to make the war unleashed by them for the sake of gain, for the conquest of new colonies, the capture new markets, etc. ostensibly fair.
All the signs point to impending war. Russia is surrounded by US-NATO military bases. Now Ukraine has its back turned to Russia and now facing NATO- United States, which is conducting a rabid anti-Russian campaign across all the media. There is no doubt that as soon as the parliamentary election campaign is over, the carnage in the Donbass will flare up with renewed vigor. Donbass is needed by the US-EU (NATO) not only as a region rich in shale gas and other minerals, but, first and foremost, as a springboard for an attack on Russia.
Russia is a nuclear power, though sharply weakened as a result of the treacherous policy of unilateral disarmament, has nuclear missile potential.
In recent years, Russian President Vladimir Putin has begun to take measures to restore the feverish former military power. According to military analysts, experts and observers, by 2018-2020 biennium Russia has all chances to recover nuclear its parity with the United States.
But the aggressor will not wait so long.
In the US, various scenarios have been played out to commit aggression against Russia. Of course, we cannot know everything; that issue is the responsibility and duty of the relevant intelligence agencies of the Russian Federation. But, on the basis of open publications, statements of American politicians and the military, one of those scenarios is the delivery by US forces of a limited number of nuclear strikes on 20 major military-political and economic centres of Russia, in order to achieve complete disruption of management and leadership, in order to force Russia to surrender on favourable conditions for the aggressor.
Another scenario is to attempt removal from power of the Putin regime and its replacement by a regime of national-traitors of the representatives of the liberal-Zionist openly pro-American opposition, by organizing "mass protest" on the model of the Kiev Maidan.
And here before the Bolsheviks, the question arises, what should our attitude be towards to Putin.
In my opinion, the answer here is clear. Putin is a bourgeois leader, anti-communist and rabid anti-Stalinist. He was brought to power as a replacement and continuer of the bloody Yeltsin. Just as Gorbachev and Yeltsin, Putin has continued the policy of unilateral disarmament of Russia in the face of an increasingly escalating militarily US-NATO aggressor. Just one treacherous START-3treaty alone signed by Obama and Medvedev in April 2010, in Prague, and which the United States received a huge unilateral military advantage (in particular, the possibility to deploy a missile defence system in Europe directed against Russia; in exclusion from the Treaty of cruise missiles long-range sea-based both in normal and in the nuclear option, etc.). Everyone remembers how at the time Obama and the US leaders talked about resetting relations with Russia, that the US and Russia from enemies become partners. And all this was done with one purpose, to lull the vigilance of the Russian leadership, to play on the ambitions (allegedly the leaders of Russia are among the world's ruling elite that is by far not so – the emerged oligarchy and its political representatives allowed themselves to plunder their own people, create and accumulate unjustly acquired multi-billion dollar wealth, but always remember his place, his place as a dependent subordinate secondary structure of world Zionism, the world's financial capital) and on this basis to make further unilateral disarmament and the encirclement of Russia.
Putin has always represented the interests (in political terms, and in the individual himself is a billionaire) the oligarchy of Russia (primarily raw oil magnates). In connection with all the growing threat of war against Russia, he objectively, moved into the bourgeois-patriotic camp, while being a servant of the oligarchs (separate processes against individual oligarchs, such as against B. Evtushenkov, the master of "Bashneft", oneone should be misled. Another round of competition is underway between different groups of oligarchs and the Russian president in this fight gets on one side or another, thus becoming associated with the respective group and dependent on it).
Putin could not hand over Crimea to the Americans, when the vast majority of the population voted for reunification with Russia, realizing at the same time the generally accepted international right of nations to self-determination. Let us look at this another way. Just suppose Putin allowed Crimea to be hosted by US-NATO fighters and Sevastopol - "a city of Russian sailors," a city of naval glory of Russia, will be the naval base of the US-NATO, this would mean the biggest betrayal of national (and military-strategic) the interests of Russia, a military-political suicide.
But Putin is not supporting the anti-fascist uprising in Donbass. And did not support it because of his bourgeois class character. Putin is afraid that this uprising will be proletarian and socialist in character and, along with the Zionist-Bandera Kiev regime, sweep away from the face of the earth the bourgeois-oligarchic power in Russia with him at the helm also.
Hence the successful offensive by the Donbass militia was halted in late August and the relevant agreement in Minsk signed. The Kiev junta gained respite, got a chance to regroup, and relying on external support to counter-attack and try to stifle the revolt. Here Putin, and Putin’s leadership came in harness with the Kiev Zionist-fascists. Moreover, by not defending the people of Donbass, Putin actually allowed a war to start with Russia, because the people of Donbass and the people of Russia, are, by and large, a single essence. Putin and the Russian leadership believe it can negotiate with Western "partners", and will appease the aggressor. Herein, lies the profound error. The more they pander to the aggressors, the more of an appetite for aggression erupts. This is evidenced by the whole history of war and international relations, and this is evidenced above statement of Barack Obama. The imperialists of the West are not "partners" of Russia, but its most vicious enemies. Trying to negotiate with them, means taking Russia towards US-NATO massacre.
The tasks of the Bolsheviks is to raise the working masses of Russia to fight against both bourgeois factions against both bourgeois camps – both the bourgeois-patriotic and openly pro-Western liberal-Zionists, to fight for the destruction of the power of capital, for the restoration of Soviet power and socialism, for revival of the USSR.
This is the only way to save Russia from the West and the subjugation of colonial slavery.
The question arises, whether a revolutionary situation has matured, whether there is the presence of the objective conditions of a proletarian revolution.
Lenin noted that evidence of a revolutionary situation, lies in one of its most important features, that is the rapid increase in the number of multiple participants in the protest struggle, turning this struggle into a millionstrong struggle covering the vast masses of the people.
The creator of history is the people who have risen to the revolutionary struggle against their oppressors.
In the aggression against the people of Donbass and attempts to suppress the anti-fascist uprising in blood, the ruling junta Bandera awoke the vast masses. Millions of refugees from the Donbass, destroyed cities and businesses, destroyed infrastructure, mass unemployment, the death of tens of thousands of civilians - all of this is of growing class hatred in the hearts of the people towards the ruling Zionist junta, towards the modern Banderovites who are brutally destroying all dissent.
The people themselves have taken up arms to defend their right to speak in their native Russian language, and not to worship Bandera, those bloody fascist minions and executioners, including their own Ukrainian (West-Ukrainian) people to defend their right to life itself, the lives of their loved ones, the right to live in their native land.
Now begins the awakening of the people of western and central Ukraine. Hundreds of corpses come in the Western Ukrainian cities and villages, forcing people to think, and in the name of what their fathers, sons, husbands, brothers gave their lives, against whom they were fighting in the east of Ukraine, and what and who they are there to protect ?! The territorial integrity of Ukraine ?! So Ukraine until February 21 was a unified single state and only after coming to power of Bandera, did she begin to disintegrate. You can not build a single state, arousing hatred of one part of the working people towards another, preaching nationalism, fomenting ethnic hatred and strife.
Incidentally, the fascist Banderites hate Lenin so much also because he was an internationalist and enemy of all ethnic hatred, hatred and enmity.
Modern Banderites, these servants of the Zionists, preaching nationalism, are seeking to hide from workers of any nationality their main enemy - the bourgeoisie, capital, US-NATO imperialism.
But sooner or later the nationalist dope and outright Russophobic lie will be shattered.
The working people of Ukraine will unite and rise up to fight against their oppressors.
Above the ground erupts the scarlet dawn of a new socialist revolution.

A. Mayevsky
Secretary of the AUCPB

The opening ceremony and reception for the exhibition of the Mansudae Art Studio was really great. It was attended by myself and other KFA and JISGE members as well a lot of different people (about a 100 all. The Ambassador of the DPRK Mr Hyon Hak Bong opened the exhibition saying it will contribute greatly to cultural exchange between Britain and the DPRK.
The DPRK Artists had been staying for 2 weeks and had painted many scenes of London including Traflagar Square and scenes of the Thames Riverside. Ambassador Hyon said that a young man had phoned the embassy saying that he recognised his girlfriend in one of the pictures!
For more reports and pictures please see the UK KFA Facebook page
The Exhibition was open until the 7th of November.


Hostile Forces Hit for Their Moves to Adopt Anti-DPRK "Human Rights Resolution
Pyongyang, October 30 (KCNA) -- The hostile forces' moves to have an anti-DPRK "human rights resolution" adopted have reached a graver phase this year, timed to coincide with the U.S. start of all-out confrontation with the DPRK.
A spokesman for the DPRK Foreign Ministry issued a statement on Thursday in this regard.
The DPRK has made earnest and sincere efforts to promote international dialogue and cooperation in the field of human rights for the purpose of steadily promoting the popular masses' enjoyment of
human rights, the statement said, and went on:
In the recent days the DPRK took a magnanimous stand to positively take into consideration the issue of conducting human rights dialogue which had been frozen due to the unilateral action of the EU and the issue of the visit of the UN special rapporteur on
human rights issue in the DPRK to it for the purpose of promoting genuine human rights on the principle of respect for sovereignty, agreed with the matter of the visit of the EU representative with full mandate over human rights to the DPRK and expressed an intention to accept technical cooperation with the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.
Nevertheless, international dialogue and cooperation have not been effected in the field of human rights. This is attributable to the U.S. hostile policy to tarnish the image of the DPRK and bring down its social system at any cost by persistently hyping its "human rights issue".
It was none other than the U.S. which let its Secretary of State convene a "high-level meeting on human rights in north Korea" and barred the DPRK, the party concerned, from participating in it for fear of the disclosure of the sinister backstage political confab. It
was again the U.S. which prodded into an anti-north smear campaign such human scum as "those defectors from the north" who fled to the south from their old homes and kinsmen after committing thrice-cursed
crimes. Afraid of the possible dialogue and cooperation between the DPRK and the international community in the field of human rights and,
accordingly, the further promotion of its people's enjoyment of human rights and the rising international prestige of the DPRK, the U.S. is making desperate efforts to maintain an international atmosphere of
pressure on the DPRK, turning its face away from the latter's sincere efforts and raising unreasonable demands.
If the EU adopts an anti-DPRK "human rights resolution" harsher than the previous one, dancing to the U.S. tune, an opportunity of engaging the DPRK over the human rights issue will be missed for good
and this will entail unpredictable consequences.
The DPRK will make every possible effort to defend and consolidate the Korean-style socialist system based on the popular masses-first spirit.

(our joint statement is here
DPRK Says No to U.S. Dialogue on Human Rights, Nuclear Dialogue Aimed to Bring down It

Pyongyang, November 4 (KCNA) -- A spokesman for the DPRK Foreign Ministry Tuesday gave the following answer to a question put by KCNA
blasting the U.S. for politicizing its accusation against the DPRK over its human rights issue:
U.S. authorities including the secretary of State and the special envoy for six-party talks of the Department of State let loose a spate
of politically motivated malignant invectives to tarnish the image of the DPRK politically and morally and justify its moves to isolate and stifle it over its non-existent "human rights issue".
It is a trite method of the U.S. to fake up "human rights issues" of those countries which incur its displeasure, cause internal instability, split and destabilization and thus seek regime changes
through "coloring revolution" and "peaceful transition" in the long-run.
There is a big difference between the discussion on genuine human rights and "human rights issue" used as a political lever for making something like "coloring revolution."
The U.S. does not recognize the state sovereignty which comprehensively reflects the human rights of the Korean people. It is, therefore, nonsensical for the U.S. to take issue with their human rights this or that way.
The present U.S. administration, the present U.S. secretary of State, in particular, unlike the successive U.S. administrations, are officially pursuing a policy for bringing down the state and social system of the DPRK over the "human rights issue", thus reneging on the
September 19, 2005 joint statement which calls upon the DPRK and the U.S. to "respect each other's sovereignty and exist peacefully," the statement which laid a basic groundwork for denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula.
The denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula has become totally meaningless for the DPRK under the situation where the U.S. is reneging on its commitment. It is self-evident that one party cannot discuss its unilateral disarming with the rival party keen to bring it
down at any cost.
The DPRK keeps the door of dialogue on genuine human rights open to the countries that respect its sovereignty but it will never allow any human rights dialogue or nuclear one with the enemy keen to
overthrow it.
The U.S. will witness the shining victory of the DPRK's line of simultaneously developing the two fronts before the expiry of the tenure of office of the present administration, not just the distant future.

ASSPUK, JISGE and the UK Korean Friendship Association Applaud Stand
of DPRK of rejecting so-called dialogue
London 4 November Juche 103(2014)
The Association For the Study of Songun Politics UK, the Juche Idea Study Group of England and the UK Korean Friendship Association in support the stance of the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea on U.S. Dialogue on Human Rights, Nuclear Dialogue Aimed to Bring down It as clarified by the answer given by a DPRK Foreign Ministry spokesman on the 4th of November :
It is an old, old trick of the US imperialists to bring forward the "human rights " issue as a means of destabilsing other countries and overthrowing the systems of states that are not to their liking , in
other words states which refuse to be part of the US-led imperialist "New World Order " and which reject imperialist globalisation. In the 1970s the US imperialists used "human rights " as a stick to beat the
USSR and Eastern European socialist countries with and used as a means of effecting the so-called "peaceful transition " strategy aimed at destroying socialism by devious and underhand means . In more recent
years we have seen the trick of the so-called "colour revolution ".
Dialogue between parties, between states, can only be conducted on the basis of equality and mutual respect. If one side tries to use dialogue as a means of undermining or destroying the other side , this is is not dialogue . Thus there can be no dialogue on the "human rights " issue or nuclear issue until the US respects the sovereignty of the DPRK and finally ends it hostile policy towards the DPRK completely and irreversibly.
We admire the fact that under the far sighted Songun revolutionary policy of dear respected Marshal Kim Jong Un and the Workers' Party of Korea the DPRK is not fooled by these tricks of the US imperialists and their bag carriers . The DPRK will not
unilaterally disarm itself as some others did . The DPRK is absolutely correct to reject such false dialogue and stick to the anti-imperialist independent line.
We have every confidence that the DPRK will win final victory by pursuing the dual track line of developing the economy and nuclear force.
Victory to the DPRK !
Long live the anti-imperialist, anti US policy of the DPRK
Long Live Songun Politics

South Korea is the the only country in the world not to have actual
operational wartime command over its own armed forces. This has been
postponed indefinitely
Our statement is here
ASSPUK, JISGE and UK KFA condemn the indefinite postponement of the
transfer of OPECON.

London 30th of October Juche 103(2014)
The Association for the Study of Songun Politics UK, Juche Idea Study
Group of England and UK Korean Friendship Association issued a joint statement denouncing the indefinite postponement of the transfer of
wartime operational by the US to south Korea (known as OPECON): The U.S. and south Korean puppet authorities, at the recent 46th annual security consultative meeting in Washington, agreed to put off
the transfer of OPECON (wartime operation control), which had been scheduled by 2015, almost indefinitely basically giving the US the permanent right of wartime command over the south Korean armed forces.
Control of one's own armed forces is absolutely essential for sovereignty , in fact a natural perquisite for sovereignty . Without the right of command at all times over one's armed forces a state cannot be called a sovereign state.
The fact that the US has indefinitely postponed the transfer of wartime operational control to south Korea proves doubly and triply beyond all doubt that south Korea is not an indeed state , it cannot be an independent state but is a colony of US imperialism. South Korea was created by US imperialism and is today controlled and dominated by the US imperialists in all fields.
The present south Korean puppet regime has shown their true faces as abominable traitors and bootlickers of US imperialism . South Korea is a modern day colony , an anachronism in today's world of independence
and national liberation !
Our organisations, the ASSPUK, JISGE and UK KFA , support the statement of the secretariat of the Committee for Peaceful Reunification (no 1077 ) which calls for decisive counter-measures against the postponement of the transfer for OPECON.
Indeed the progressive and peace loving peoples of the world should support the Korean people in their struggle for sovereignty and total independence

The anti campaign of the British media managed to plumb new depths !
In order to try and discredit and malign the dignified image of the DPRK supreme leadership they published some very silly stories recently . These articles contribute nothing to understanding the DPRK
but just go to show the puerile mentality of some journalists !

November 20th Meeting of the Juche Idea Study Group of England was held .
December 14th 2014 Commemorative Meeting

Thursday, 30 October 2014

For Bolshevism No 11 (140) November 2014

For Bolshevism inside the Communist and Workers’ Movement

No 11 (140) November 2014

(Article Three)
While forensic linguistic examination is conducted for the presence in the newspaper "Workers' and Peasants truth" (Raboche-Krestyanskya Pravda) of calling for "inciting ethnic hatred" (?!), the Ukrainian Special Services (SBU) continues its own activity behind the scenes.
Firstly, the authorities in the SBU scrutinise all subscribers the newspaper "Workers' and Peasants truth" (apparently, the data provided to them comes from the structures of Ukrposhta – the Ukrainian postal service), and conduct with them the appropriate interviews in order to intimidate our readers into identifying supporters of Bolshevism, to make them reject Bolshevik activities. Such conversations and interviews by the SBU were held with a number of readers and subscribers of ""Workers' and Peasants truth" in the Transcarpathian, Vinnytsia, Nikolaev regions. It is clear that the same "work" is being carried out by the SBU structures in other regions of Ukraine.
But the vast majority of readers and subscribers of the newspaper are showing boldness and courage and can not be blackmailed by Special Branch.
That's right. Even according to their bourgeois constitution, Article 34 it states:
"Everyone is guaranteed the right to freedom of thought and expression, the freedom of expression of their views and beliefs.
Everyone has the right to freely collect, store, use and disseminate information orally, in writing or otherwise - of their choice."
However, in the third part of this article are immediately imposed restrictions on the exercise of the above rights – as follows:
"The exercise of these rights may be restricted by law in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, to prevent disorder or crime, for the protection of public health, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary."
Immediately this part of Article 34 raises several questions: -
What law and for what reason are the use of the above rights limited?
Where were the SBU authorities looking, when in the winter Maidan period, the nationalists led by the right sectors and militants of "Svoboda" grossly disturbed public order by seizing the western and central regions of Ukraine and Kiev government agencies, ministries and departments, including the SBU institutions?
Why were the nationalist and pro-fascist neo-bandera parties and movements not punished, as well as the regime at their service, by fault of which incited ethnic hatred in Ukraine fuelled by a ardent hatred of Russia, of all things Russian, and which led to the violation of the territorial integrity Ukraine and led to its further disintegration and destruction?
Other articles of the Constitution of Ukraine are also flagrantly violated the provisions and in particular: -
Article 10: "In Ukraine, the free development, use and protection of Russian and other languages of national minorities of Ukraine are guaranteed";
Article 24: "Citizens have equal constitutional rights and freedoms and are equal before the law.
There can be no privileges or restrictions based on race, colour, political, religious or other beliefs, sexual, ethnic or social origin, property status, place of residence, linguistic or other characteristics."
Secondly, the SBU was able to single out the printing house, in which we have 10 years of publishing the newspaper, and "put pressure" on its management and out of court to prohibit the printing of "Workers' and Peasants truth», №9 (210).
Naturally, we managed to find a print shop and print a newspaper with a circulation of two thousand copies (in the original data, for technical reasons, we were not able to make changes); however, it cost a lot more expensive, but we had output.
In any case, we see it as our duty to continue to expose this anti-people anti-national Bandera fascist regime in Ukraine, which has handed over the Ukrainian people and handed the country over to slaughter by the dollar and Zionist capital; which unleashed carnage between Ukrainians and Russians in favour of the imperialist predators US-NATO and has a policy of genocide against the people of Donbass; and which makes every effort to provoke and start a war with Russia.
We thank our readers for their material and moral assistance and support of our work.
As stressed by Comrade Stalin
"Our cause is just, - victory will be ours!"
From the EDITORIAL of "WORKERS' AND PEASANTS TRUTH" (Raboche-Krestyanskya Pravda)


According to media materials
In early September, Ukraine Prime Minister Yatsenyuk presented another project called "The Wall".
More precisely, Yatsenyuk already at the government level is trying to bring to life the idea of the construction of an idea by Kolomoiskiy for the construction of a complex of fortifications ("walls") between Ukraine and Russia - for example, like the wall between Israel and Palestine. According to officials, construction will begin in Kharkov and Sumsky regions. On the onshore area solid ditches are scheduled for digging with a minimum width of 4 m and 2 m deep with the installation of electronic control systems. On the offshore area - a unified system of optical-electronic surveillance will be assembled together with the fortifications. The United States has pledged to give the Ukrainian border guards "humanitarian" aid in the form of 2,500 coils of barbed wire.
The proclaimed aim of the "wall" is the destruction of the system of supplies to the DPR snd LPR of arms and rescue personnel and protect Ukraine from invasion by Russia. Although from the very beginning, the project of the "wall" was full of holes – the militia of the DPR and LPR control about 500 km (about a quarter of the total length of the "wall") of the Ukrainian-Russian border.
According to Kolomoiskiy, the cost of installing a metal fence throughout the state border with Russia will be about 50 million Euros, the same overall cost of all engineering work – of up to 100 million Euros. As noted Yatsenyuk said that at the initial stage money will be available but for the rest of the sum, the prime minister intends to make begging appeals to the EU "to obtain the financial and technical assistance for the implementation of this project."
According to experts, from a military point of view, this "wall" is not an obstacle. Both Russian and Ukrainian armies are equipped with equipment built in the 1980s in the form of a complex of TMM-6 (heavy mechanized bridges), through which in the space of 40 minutes a metal bridge can be erected with a carrying capacity of 60 tons over obstacles up to a width of 100 m and a depth of 5 m.
* *
The Prime Minister has more important things than burying money in the ground.
President of Ukraine Poroshenko was forced to admit that even without the use of any special measures, Ukrainian trade with the countries of the Customs Union (Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan) fell by 30% and that in no case can be allowed any further deterioration in terms of trade. (How sincerely his statement really is, is another matter).
A Yatsenyuk is all uneasy. He even rejoices that trade with Russia decreased by 2.5 billion dollars. "Still less dependence on Russia," - says the prime minister at a meeting of the Cabinet. And the fact that at the same time, jobs are cut, people are not paid, the prime minister cares not a jot. More important to him s how he can in any way annoy Russia, dealing a blow at the same time to ordinary simple workers of Ukraine, whilst taking orders from his American-Zionist masters.
The agency Standard & Poor's has classified the banking system of Ukraine in the highest risk group. According to analysts of the agency, the credit risk in the economy remains "extremely high." Negative factors, the agency also said are found in the deterioration of the macroeconomic situation and the deep recession in the country in 2014
But those arriving to power "honest and incorruptible patriots" continue to profit from the long-suffering Ukrainian people. So, for the past six months, Ukraine exported to offshore zones (i.e. hidden from taxation in Ukraine) 133 billion. UAH., which is 19.7 billion higher than in the second half of last year under the regime of Yanukovych-Azarov.
Ordinary Ukrainians are dying, and businessmen continue to enrich themselves, to enrich themselves on human blood in the war.

* *
On September 16, the Verkhovna Rada voted for the ratification of the Association Agreement with the EU, which right there, right in the parliament, was signed by the president. Simultaneously, the European Parliament also ratified the Association Agreement. But the agreement establishing a free trade EU-Ukraine was postponed for 15 months - until December 31, 2015
What have you been fighting for, gentlemen-nationalists?
On the same day, September 16, the Ukrainian parliament in closed session adopted another two laws: the law "On special order of the local government in certain areas of Donetsk and Lugansk regions" (Law on the special status of Donbass) and the law "On the prevention of prosecution and punishment of persons-participants in the events in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions. "The law on the special status of Donbass was adopted for a period of 3 years.
It should be noted that for the law on the special status, according to the leader of "Svoboda" Oleg Tyagnibok, not a single vote was given to his faction, as well as some of the deputies of the "Fatherland".
In exchange for giving up the armed struggle for independence, the militia of New Russia was given a proposal to:
- Form a special procedure for local government for a period of three years, including the formation of local people's militia units, which are "formed on a voluntary basis from a number of Ukrainian citizens permanently residing in their respective localities," and guide them;
- A ban on "discrimination, harassment and prosecution of persons on the events that took place in Donetsk and Luhansk regions." But the law applies to those who are within one month from the date of entry into force of Act frees hostages voluntarily and surrender firearms, ammunition, military equipment. It is also proposed not to extend the law to those suspected or accused of the attempted murder of state or public figures, sabotage, premeditated murder. Amnesty also does not apply to individuals whose actions led to the catastrophe of the Malaysian Airlines plane onthe 17.07.2014
In fact, this law is directed against the militias, because fighters from the Right Sector and the similar armed nationalist formations are not thinking about disarming themselves.
- Guarantee the right to use Russian or any other language "in public and private life, learning and support for the Russian or any other language, their free development and equality";
- Before the end of the year to hold a special elections to local authorities.
The question arises, why then did the ruling junta unleash a war against its own people in the South-East of Ukraine, which killed thousands of innocent people? ..
In the DPR and LPR, these laws have been embraced critically, as the laws of the adjacent state and are ready to just take them into account. The country has its own Supreme Council, and the laws of the territory are adopted by it.
"As the first reaction of the leaders of the republics and non-governmental organizations that support the idea of New Russia, they are wary of the bill. By this, rather, it is now almost law. They, of course, expect from Kiev some dirty tricks "- said the coordinator of the "Civil Initiative of Donbass" Oleg Izmailov.
Thus, the first deputy. DPR Prime Minister Andrew Purgin said that some political construction with Ukraine, federal or otherwise, for the DPR and LPR is not possible.
We can not say that the law "is fully consistent with our expectations – said the chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Council of the DPR Dennis Pushilin. - But they are the first steps towards peace. We are still far from peace, but we are in the right direction, when the conflict channels into a political mainstream. Shootings and the destruction of infrastructure will not achieve anything."
According to the Prime Minister of the LPR, Igor Plotnitsky the inscribed in Minsk adoption of the law on the special status of Donetsk and Lugansk by Kiev does not mean their rejection of independence. But for the sake of peace, the self-proclaimed republic is prepared to make compromises.
* *
Paul Gubarev, head of the public organization Peoples Defence Force of Donbass, spoke in support of the armistice agreements, reached on September 5 in Minsk after a meeting of the contact group on conflict resolution in New Russia. However, he stressed that it is necessary to include a point in the Minsk protocol on the independence of Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics and to continue negotiations from this point.
"To solve problems in a peaceful way is better than the military way. Who can argue? Peace talks – are always good - says Pavel Gubarev. - In this regard, I support the Minsk agreement. But with two caveats: the independence of the Donetsk and Lugansk people's republics should be the starting point for these negotiations, and a truce should be observed de facto. "
And the "people's governor" of Donbass concludes:
"It is impossible to negotiate for peace, when "Grad” units of the "Ukrainian army continue to conduct attacks on the cities of Donbass. In this sense, the truce is imaginary. Ukraine, apparently is preparing a new escalation of the conflict. It is known that the Ukrainian side in talks with NATO on arms, hires a private military company. Poroshenko himself openly states that this war was for a long time, if not even to mention the word "federalization". We believe that from these points to talk about peace is very difficult, so peace must be established in reality and the negotiations should continue, and the starting point for them to be the independent republics of New Russia, as I have said."
And the fact that the Minsk agreement is no more than fiction than respite is designed in order to conduct elections ostensibly in peaceful surroundings and, most importantly, for regrouping of forces, according to the statement indicated by Yuriy Lutsenko, leader of the "Poroshenko Block", in the upcoming parliamentary elections.
In his article "A New Start", published on September 7 in the blog on the "UP" Lutsenko says: "Lugandon. Take Donetsk and Lugansk with a jingoistic storm, we probably can. But street battles take away tens of thousands of the best of us. And yet it will lead to a total collapse and in an economy barely alive. It makes more sense to do it the other way, when we have a stronger army and economy. An example is Croatia. After the capture of Vukovar by the Yugoslav army, where thousands of advocates of independence perished heroically, Croats were forced to accept the existence of Serbian Krajina. For three years, they did not just tolerate this, but developed the economy and the army. And then in a matter of hours, a tank attack swept the separatists from their land."
Conclusion. The Militia fighters of Novorossia need vigilance in respect to maneuvers, including and diplomatic ones on the Ukrainian side. Bandera fascists can not be trusted.
* *
Early parliamentary elections were scheduled for October 26. It is clear that the Bandera fascist government wants to strengthen its position, having completely transformed the parliament into an instrument of their National Bandera dictatorship and disposing of the parliamentary opposition.
The Communist Party of Ukraine for this election comes with absolutely toothless program in which there is not even a mention of the need to fight for socialism.
But a way out of that disaster, which currently Ukraine finds itself in, is possible only on the path of revolutionary struggle for the overthrow of the power of capital in the form of the criminal-Bandera bloody fascist dictatorship in the fight for socialism, for Soviet power, for the revival of our single multinational Soviet Motherland.

From an observer


Shocking information recently came out of Donbass, where on the basis of an agreement signed in Minsk fighting stopped, and a cease-fire in the south-east of the country put in place. Mothers of soldiers defending their land from fascist punitive government troops were sent small wooden boxes by the fascist junta inside of which were ... the severed heads of their own sons....
The exact number of these "packages" sent is not yet known, since there is a procedure of identification of remains to be tested by the Military Committee DPR. However, all were identified as self defence militia fighters of the Donetsk Peoples Republic (DPR), which were captured by the security forces during fierce fighting near Donetsk
Behind the scenes, these atrocities have been attributed to one of the punitive battalions belonging to Jewish oligarch and governor of Dnipropetrovsk region Igor Kolomoisky having recruited into these battalions radicals and criminals of the nationalist movement "Right sector", characterized by its cruelty and extreme right wing views.
One mother who lost her son, said: "This is not just cruelty, this is an atrocity! Not even animals do that to each other! My son was defending his homeland, he was not afraid to die for her and for us. But what they did to him is beyond human. Where does one look to. The UN? NATO? The European Union? Why does the Red Cross not do anything? What they needed for, when our children are treated in this way? The Ukrainian government is even worse than fascists! Not only does it not need Russia, it does not need its own people."
Another victim of this "action" carried out by the junta said that the punishers intimidate the inhabitants of south-east. And such action on their part - is another gesture of pressure. People fear for their loved ones, for themselves.


Challenges of the XXI century
Implementation of the Minsk Agreement in practice
In issue No 9 of the newspaper "Hammer and Sickle" (Serp I Molot) we placed a summary of the fighting on the fronts of the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) and the Lugansk People’s Republic (LPR) for 25 August. At the time of publication of the newspaper, a counter-offensive by troops of New Russia (Novorossiya), which began on 24 August has successfully developed. As a result of the fighting, such settlements as Schyastye, Novoazovsk (LPR), Starobeshevo, and Ilovajsk (DPR) have been liberated from the troops of the fascist Kiev junta. Soldiers of the People's Militia eliminated the threat around the area of Donetsk, they also took the key height of Saur-Mogila, and exited at the sea in the area of Novoazovsk and surrounded Mariupol (from there a general flight began by accomplices of the Ukrainian fascist rule), destroyed several large units of the Ukrainian army and reached the border with the Zaporozhye region of Ukraine.
Success by the soldiers of Donbass frightened not only the Kiev government, but also the Russian oligarchs, as well as their European and American "partners." Rebellious Donbass was in need of urgent stopping before the position of the fascist Kiev junta at the front became really disastrous.
For this purpose – to stop the counteroffensive of Novorossiya – a meeting of a tripartite group" in Minsk was hastily arranged, with the participation of representatives of Ukraine, Russia and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). On September 5, following consultations in Minsk a protocol was signed, which included 12 points, among them – a cease-fire, the withdrawal of heavy equipment from towns, the exchange of prisoners, the provision of a "special status" for Donbass (making it part of Ukraine, of course. The cynical world bourgeoisie continues to ignore the will of the people of Donbass, which proclaimed independence on 11 May).

Consequences of Ukrainian troops shelling school number 51 in Lugansk

The Novorossiya offensive was halted at full speed. The fascist Kiev junta now had an opportunity to regroup their forces and make up for losses and the lull is used actively. Into Donbass arrived Ukrainian armoured vehicles, with no withdrawal of troops from towns by the Ukrainian junta. In this case, the militia note that the truce really lasted only about two hours, after which the firing on Donetsk and Lugansk by heavy artillery resumed and occurred regularly, almost every night. There was destruction and casualties among the civilian population. On September 20, a new agreement on a cease-fire was already signed, and the next day there was a video, which captures the firing on Donetsk by Ukrainian rockets that took place – we note – on 20 September.
Field commanders (e.g., Alex Mozgovoy the commander of a mechanized brigade "Prizrak"), which are in direct contact with the Ukrainian punishers during the fighting saw with their own eyes their own atrocities, do not recognize the "Minsk agreements" and referred to them as "unacceptable." But their hands are tied – the leadership of the DPR suddenly erupted their threat to despatch a number of units of the People's Militia, if they did not carry out the "Minsk agreement", "to deal with the gangs" ("... If we do not obey the so-called ministers, they have threatened to declare us as gangs" - said A. Mozgovoy on September 22). Such is the typical attitude of the bourgeoisie towards the working people - the people, with their blood and lives providing the "elite" coming to power, are no longer needed and even dangerous to their own principles.
In addition, if the militias start to respond to provocations by Kiev troops, the entire "civilized world" raises a howl, and starts a new round of full-scale hostilities - perhaps now with the participation of American and NATO troops.
One of the few advantages "Minsk agreements" can be called the exchange of prisoners, which helped rescue from the dungeons of the Ukrainian junta a number of militias and political activists. It should be noted the fundamental difference between the prisoners. The Ukrainian soldiers who were captured by the Militia, look fine - they are not exhausted, dressed normally and completely intact externally and often are reluctant to return to their home territory, where they prison awaited them or resubmission to the front. But the militiamen who were held in captivity by the Kiev junta can not always walk on their own for a few metres as they are so beaten and exhausted.
Back in July - August, journalists reported on the atrocities by the Ukrainian punitive forces at settlements captured by them. A refugee from the Slavyansk, Galina Pyshnyak told a television reporter how a wife and young son of one of the militia were executed by the fascist neobanderites. "It was in the centre of the town on Lenin Square. Women had gathered in the square, because their husbands were no more. There were women, girls and elderly people. The fascists took a child of three years old, a little boy in shorts and a T-shirt, and just like Jesus, nailed him to a nearby bulletin board. One of the fascist did the nailing whilst two others held him up. And that all take place in front of the mother's eyes. They had held the mother. And the mother looked at the child's bleeding. The screams ... And the fascists made incisions so that the child suffered during this. The situation was impossible. People were fainting all around. And then, after an hour and a half, the child having suffered and died, they took the mother and tied her to a tank unconscious and dragged her three laps around the square. And the circumference of the square is one kilometre". After such evidence (most recently, on September 27, there was a video shown of how in Mariupol, the fascist punishers stabbed a woman and her 6-year old child) there should no longer any doubt of the correctness in the name "neobanderites" militants of the Ukrainian "National Guard" and the "right sector" who repeat exactly the actions of their ancestors from the UPA and other gangs.
On July 15, the ANNA-news agency reported that in the Odessa Special Branch of Ukraine (SBU) a peace activist, anti-fascist of the Resistance Inga Avdeev is being held. A young woman was illegally arrested, being pregnant, and tortured. The daily torture that was carried out on her, despite the obvious signs of pregnancy (torture such as sleep deprivation, walks and water, kicking, caning and whipping) led to Inga losing her unborn child. Her example is not the only one. Every day in Kharkov, Odessa, Mariupol occur kidnappings and arrests of people “under suspicion”.
Together with the release of prisoners began arriving into Donbass reliable information about torture and ill-treatment at the hands of the Ukrainian fascists. Information that takes us back to the years of occupation of Ukraine by Hitler's army.
A Stanislav militia soldier was held in captivity, by the "National Guard," for over a month. The fascist executioners burned into his body the symbol of the swastika together with the word "separatist." "They burnt it out using chain and a hot bayonet - says a former prisoner - and constantly beaten. Nobody believed it would end." For comparison - in 1943, on the back of anti-fascist underground resistance fighter Ulyana Gromovoy, the fascists carved out a five-pointed star and onto her stomach, they burned out the word "communist."
As if in imitation of the Nazis, or the propensity for sadism, the Ukrainian fascists not only do not provide care for the wounded captured militia prisoners, but try in every way to increase their suffering. "I have on my body several bullet wounds. They thrust their fingers into the wound, and twisted them in various directions and laughed, "- says the freed militia man. Another prisoner had his head smashed up by the fascist National Guard and then they sprinkled salt into the wound. This was also taken from the Nazis.
Lugansk priest Archpriest Vladimir Moretsky, recently released from captivity by the Ukrainians, talked about the conditions in which he and his companions in captivity lived under. "To say that beat us is an understatement. We were killed. We were shot, we had our bones broken, we were struck not only with hands and feet, but with rifle butts and all means at hand," - said the released prisoner. He added that "in particular Nadezhda Savchenko proved herself", who is currently under arrest in Russia's Voronezh (Nadezhda Savchenko - Ukrainian Air Force pilot, was arrested at the border on charges of complicity in the murder of Russian journalist in a war zone).
"Personally, she offered that our entire group was handed over to the authorities to earn money. Personally, she offered to shoot us when others did not agree to take us to the authorities - not to spend money on our delivery to the SBU. Personally, she was trying to destroy us, and personally took part in the sadistic antics, beat us ... "- said Archpriest Vladimir. He said that his hands and those of his comrades were tied behind their backs during the torture. Men were faced against the wall and beaten. Women were forced to stand naked in front of men.
The fascist Kiev junta uses not only the experience of Nazi Germany, but also the "methodological developments" in the American intelligence services (who, meanwhile, had learned much from the arsenal of the Gestapo and other such structures). The treatment of prisoners by the new Ukrainian fascists has been taught by trained instructors from the United States, which is clearly seen in the "handwriting" of the punishers.
A militia volunteer named Stanislav (surname withheld) was transported from Kramatorsk into Kharkov (200 kilometres) tied by his legs to the chassis of a helicopter. "At first we, they wanted the prisoners cut up by the helicopter blades, but then they decided to fly us. I began to board the helicopter, but he national guard decided that I was staining the cabin interior, so was deemed unworthy to fly in the cockpit. Then they tied me by my feet with a rope to the helicopter wheel. So that is how I flew up to Kharkov. It was scary,"- says the militia. It is this example used in this article to confirm the thesis of similarity between the methods the of the CIA and the fascist Ukrainian executioners, and here's why. In 1967, Ernesto Che Guevara was captured and shot in Bolivia. According to some sources, the development of an operation plan for his capture was made by Nazi war criminal Klaus Barbie (another common thread between the Nazis and the secret services of the USA). Together with Che were captured several other rebels. To get information about other parts of the detachment of Guevara, the CIA lifted them into the air attached to the helicopter and threatened to drop them. The body of Che Guevara was flown from La Higuera to the Valle Grande just attached to the helicopter chassis. The executions of prisoners by the American military in Vietnam were carried out by dropping them from a helicopter.
Here is a message by the organization "CyberBerkut" from July 30:
"Many people know that at the airport in the city of Mariupol is the coordinating headquarters ATO. However, not everyone knows that here there is a filtration centre where American and Israeli instructors teach members of the special battalion "Dnepr-1", the "art" of interrogation under torture. "
Presumably, it was here that editor of the newspaper "I want to live in USSR!" Sergey Dolgov was martyred (according to other sources, he is in prison in Zaporozhe). Some 11 years ago, in 2003 - 04 years in occupied Iraq the infamous prison "Abu Ghraib" was built, which was - as with the Mariupol centre – built at the airport (of Baghdad). It was from there spread throughout the world photos of bullying American warriors over the prisoners. On the similarity of methods (up to obsessive desire to capture the torturers themselves on camera near the victims) will be discussed below. All cited in the same message by the group "CyberBerkut":
"From one "repentant" representative of the National Guard, it became known of the inhuman and brutal actions of the members of the death squads engaged in "filtration activities" in the so-called liberated cities. Detainees were taken out into the woods, where they were abused in the most perverted forms, and those who refused to obey were beaten to death in front of others. ... The detainees were forced to perform homosexual acts with each other and genitals mutilated along with other forms of abuse. All actions were recorded on video and mobile phones." That is the direction in torture that is typical for the American military in the last 10 - 12 years.
Similar actions are also told by those who could be prisoner exchanged for escape from Ukrainian law enforcers. Thus, one of the former prisoners, who worked on the "first aid" in the DPR, was forced by gunmen of the fascist junta to videotape a "repentance" appeal, with the threat of rape of women doctors, captured with him is he refused. Drunken National Guards tried to get another detained militiaman held at gunpoint to rape a female prisoner.
The abuse by the militants of the "National Guard" (note that this a volunteer formation!) apply not only to militias, but also civilians. On the outskirts of Donetsk, as well as from settlements liberated from the Ukrainian junta troops can regularly be found mass graves.
Several dozen of these graves have been found. In the largest, according to the TV channel "LifeNews", there are remains of more than thirty people. Among the dead - scantily clad women and girls with hands tied behind their backs with wire.
We now know of dozens of "execution-by-shooting graves" in the settlements Communar, Nizhny Krinka, Telmanovo, Starobeshevo. The number of victims could be in the hundreds.
In those regions of Ukraine, where there is no fighting, the fascist government henchmen terrorize the local population. In Kharkov, Odessa and Zaporozhye, anti-fascist and anti-war rallies were held on September 27 under the red flag. All of them were violently dispersed by Ukrainian police and the Security Service. On a video from Kharkov, a police officer was clearly heard saying "this rally is banned" (more than 30 participants of the meeting were arrested).
On the evening of September 28 in Kharkov, neo-Nazis held their own rally, which - of course! – went ahead without a problem from police. After their coven, the nazi neo-banderites with national flags of Ukraine, symbols of the "right sector" and the volunteer battalion MIA "Azov" the crowd broke into Liberty Square and began to destroy the statue of V.I. Lenin. The statue, in the end, was demolished, and during this, four vandals were hurt - someone fell from the pedestal, breaking his spine, and another other was hit in the face from dangling wire (eyes was knocked out).
The only one (!) defender of Ilyich, was an elderly man who was trying to literally shield the monument, but the neo-Nazis gave him a beating with their boots. Presumably, he died on the way to the hospital.
Before bringing down the statue, the fascist vandals scratched on the pedestal their own slogan "Glory to Ukraine" using a punch and the Nazi symbol resembling a swastika (the so-called "wolf's hook", "wolfsangel" - the emblem of the police division of the SS. Now it is also the official emblem of the voluntary punitive battalion "Azov", which is very significant).
The criminal case opened into the destruction of the monument, was immediately terminated. The governor of Balut immediately after the vandalism signed a decree on the deprivation of the status of cultural monument of the object and of its dismantling. The head of the Interior Ministry, the multimillionaire A. Avakov was also a named official for responsibility for the demolition.
It should be noted that the neo-banderites treat the monuments of V.I. Lenin like animate objects. They do not demolish, but kill, like they could kill a man. For example, in order to topple the monument to Lenin in Kharkov, the fascists sawed off his feet. In several photos from Liberty Square can be seen that the figure of VI Lenin also had a smashed head.
It is no accident that the monuments to the leader of the world proletariat they are so hated by the fascists who seized power in Ukraine. For them, these monuments are the symbol of a state of free workers and peasants, the symbol of the immortal ideas embodied nearly a century ago in simple and understandable to everyone slogans: "Land to the peasants, factories to the workers and peace to the people!" Communist ideas pose a mortal threat to the fascist Kiev junta and its pawns. This hatred of the enemy, behind which hides a sneaky fear is the highest value for every fighter for the victory of the proletarian revolution, the best sign of the correctness of the course charted by Marx - Engels – V.I. Lenin – J.V. Stalin.
At the same time in the Donbass there are continuing military provocations on part of the Kiev junta. Recently, a group of Ukrainian military in battle, broke out onto the territory of Donetsk airport, grossly violating the truce. The militias were forced to repel them.
This is modern Ukrainian fascism, nurtured by the hands of American special services on Ukrainian money (and not only) of the oligarchs. Despite the declared truce, the fighting did not subside in Donbass. The Kiev junta seeks in any way to cause a backlash from the militias to make Novorossiya look the aggressor. The agreement on the withdrawal of heavy military equipment from the towns has not been fulfilled by Kiev. According to intelligence reports of the People's Militia (published on the Internet), in the punitive junta formations not only have they decided not to withdraw troops near Debalcevo, but also continue regular shelling on civilian settlements against the peaceful civilian population of Novorossiya.
The press service of the Dnipropetrovsk regional state administration unveiled the reasoning of oligarch Kolomoiskiy that Poroshenko, choosing between the introduction of martial law and a general mobilization on the one hand and a truce with the LPR and the DPR on the other, they chose the latter. However, this does not mean that the authorities in Kiev intend to comply with the agreements reached. "We must understand that the peace process has been brought about by the fact that winter is not far off. It is this fear of winter, which is projected to be still very cold, that has made everyone sit down at the negotiating table. We are not fighting with the citizens of Ukraine. We have an enemy who occupied Crimea, which provoked the situation in the Donbass. In the spring, we must be fully prepared and ready for anything "- confessed the oligarch.
No matter how the situation develops in the near future, it is clear that a military confrontation between the junta and Novorossia will again enter into an open phase. Militias will have to return fire, and the whole world bourgeoisie will take advantage of this to unleash a new war of aggression.
In addition, this war can not end with any territorial and political concessions. Too much has been done as such that you can not forgive and forget. War in Donbass is the continuation of the great battle against fascism, which started in 1939 - 1941. In this war, we wish the working people of Donbass only victory!

Written by E. Fatyanova

On September 9, 2014, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea solemnly celebrated its glorious 66th anniversary
Young Socialist Korea after the liberation of Korea from the Japanese yoke rose in 1948 on the ruins of squalid huts of the poor conditions in the general devastation, acute needs, the lack of industrial enterprises, scientific, technical and professional personnel (almost complete ignorance of the population and only 12 people with higher education for the whole of Korea), the presence of small-scale frail unproductive agriculture. Here's what was left to the Korean people over a 50-year reign of the Japanese invaders. Appearing before the world, the new Korea squared her shoulders and began to build a new life in the beautiful land of Morning Calm. The people who had driven out the Japanese invaders from their land under the leadership of the Great Leader Comrade Kim Il Sung, voluntarily chose their future historical path - the path of socialism, the path of independence, self-reliance, the path relying only on their own strength, the path of Juche, the path of Songun. Kim Il Sung, paving the way for the Songun revolution, proposed the idea of the priority of weapons, the priority of military affairs: against the imperialist aggressors to resolutely fight with weapons in their hands, to respond to armed aggression with a just liberation war.
Songun politics is not only for the defence of the socialist fatherland, but also to build a new life by the army. Songun politics of the country became a state policy under Kim Jong-Il, and has provided a peaceful sky over the DPRK and having developed nuclear weapons, there is no chance of any encroachment on the independence of the country from outside. Under Kim Jong-Il, the country far stepped forward. This period of Korean history is characterized by the rapid development of the economy, science, art, culture, education, and great strides in social development of society. Thus the correctness of the Songun politics is confirmed by life itself.
In the context of hostile imperialist encirclement, permanent military provocations, both information and political in character, Socialist Korea in the ongoing severe economic blockade organized by the United States, has not only survived, but also to worldwide surprise stands firmly on its feet, has built its highly developed heavy and light industry, its own a strong energy base, highly productive agriculture by the reconstruction of all arable land, has created a widely ramified reclamation system for rice, fish farms and cooperatives are organized almost everywhere in the countryside, with orchards covering the mountains and hills. (In the DPRK, arable areas make up no more than 20%, therefore all possible areas of land are used for agriculture).
For 66 years of the socialist path, the DPRK has been transformed into a country of universal literacy. The slogan – the cadres decide everything! - underlies the development of the whole society. Today in the DPRK, scientific research in various fields has been raised to a high level. Many research institutes have been created. Huge attention is devoted to the well-being of every Korean citizen and his or her health. The problem of providing a highly qualified medical service of the residents of the most remote areas of the capital has been solved. Special attention is given to the younger generation, their state of health and the educating of a highly moral citizen as a worthy continuer of their fathers and grandfathers. Much attention is focused on civil engineering in both urban and rural areas. Every family lives in a free state provided separate comfortable apartment. And today the life of a citizen of the DPRK continues to prosper. The capital of the DPRK, Pyongyang, is considered one of the most comfortable, clean and beautiful cities in the world.
Today the DPRK clearly demonstrates the advantages of socialism. The achieved successes in the DPRK are made possible by the correct policy of the ruling party - the Workers' Party of Korea, the monolithic unity of society - the unity of the people, the leader, Army, Party, the Leader’s devotion to serving his people and life for the sake of the nation.
Today, the storming of the heights of the socialist nation continues under the leadership of a young leader, as well as his great predecessors, selflessly serving their people. Comrade Kim Jong Un is confidently steering the country’s course, inscribed by the Great Leader Comrade Kim Il Sung and the Great Leader Comrade Kim Jong Il. We wish the heroic people of the DPRK new successes in building a prosperous state under the leadership of Comrade Kim Jong Un.



In Moscow, on 21 September 2014 on the initiative of a few liberal Russian non-governmental organizations, a so-called "peace march" was held According to the organizers - this action was intended to demonstrate "a protest against military intervention by Russia in the affairs of Ukraine and show the unity of the Russian citizens active in their desire to stop the war in their neighbouring country."
The column of participants marched from Pushkin Square along the Boulevard Koltso towards Sakharov Avenue. There was no rally at the end of the march. The number of the participants was amounted to 50 thousand people. Police estimated the actual number of participants at not exceeding five thousand people. The march was dominated by the Russian tricolor and Ukrainian yellow-blue flags. Flags, standards and banners of Communist orientation could not be seen, which is an important difference from the "marches" of two years ago, when some communist organizations participated unwittingly in events organized by the Liberals - their sworn enemies, added to the weight and significance of them, whether they liked or wanted that or not.
The main bulk of the "marchers" consisted of the Moscow liberal intelligentsia - the constant (and main) participators of such charades. There were the usual Mikhail Kasyanov, and Gennady Gudkov, Boris Nemtsov and Ilya Yashin, and the main sensation of the event was the appearance of the honorary leader of the "Yabloko" Grigory Yavlinsky. After a devastating defeat which that "liberal opposition" suffered in the recent elections in the Moscow City Duma (none of its candidates got elected), the organized on September 21, "Peace March" was to show the classic "I'm still alive!" (the main slogans of the march were: "Putin, Bring the troops home", "Hands off Ukraine", "Russia without Putin", as well as calls for the "abolition of anti-sanction measures", and in fact according to the August survey, by the "Levada Center," the idea of retaliatory sanctions to the some form were supported by 72 percent of Russians).
But the march demonstrated another thing – some kind of unity in only the narrow "liberal cabal," in which the participants could clearly see: in the assembly area near Pushkin Square rally were also dozens of opponents of the "anti-war march" that support the so-called separatists in Ukraine - New Russia. There was also a huge banner unfurled which read "Traitors’ March." On the approaches to the Sakharov avenue, the participants of the "Peace March" were pelted with eggs, tomatoes, shoes (!) by the "anti-participators ", with someone holding a placard saying, " grantoediy-liberasty, Russia is not with you." Participants of the "Peace March" Clashed with supporters of New Russia (Novorossiya) and the USSR. This phenomenon of "fighting" opposition by supporters diametrically differing views is a completely new phenomenon in Russian mass events (in any case - in Moscow).
Summarizing, we can say that the past event showed a further decrease in the influence and narrowing of the social base of the liberals. With regard to their influence in the "elite" of Russian society - this is an important question. The future will show - Who is Who among them.

S.V. Khristenko



The Workers' Party Korea was founded on 10th October 1945 by the great leader comrade Kim Il Sung. Its foundation was the culmination of years of hard struggle by the Korean revolutionaries led by general Kim Il Sung. With the foundation of the WPK the Korean people came to have a guide and organiser .
The WPK , under the guidance of the great leader
comrade Kim Il Sung, led many decades of socialist construction .Under the guidance of the WPK, a people's government was successfully established in the DPRK with the aim to provide the people with an
independent and creative life. After the liberation of Korea in August 1945, major democratic reforms including agrarian reform and nationalization of major industries were carried out smoothly.
The WPK carried a unique Korean style socialist
revolution creating an advanced socialist system in the DPRK .It also put forth a line of building an independent national economy and wisely led the work for its realization, thus turning the DPRK into a powerful socialist industrial state.
The WPK became the motherly party taking care
of the lives of the people ensuring that they had an equally happy life. Free medical and free education were introduced in the DPRK under the leadership of the WPK guided by the great leader comrade Kim Il Sung. The WPK is a true people's party with members from all walks of life. The WPK resolutely rejected bureaucracy and mixed with the masses.
The WPK always maintained purity in ideology and fidelity to revolutionary , class and socialist principles. Both the great leader comrade Kim Il Sung and comrade Kim Jong Il ensured that the WPK maintain independence and always stuck to the road of socialism no matter how difficult the circumstances were.
The Workers' Party of Korea has been a great contribution to world peace and to the struggle for
independence and liberation throughout the world.
Now under the wise leadership of dear respected Marshal Kim Jong Un the First Secretary of the WPK new achievements are being made. New buildings are springing up all the time with new cultural and leisure facilities being opened one after another. Victory and glory are in store for the Korean people and the WPK under the wise leadership of dear respected Marshal Kim Jong Un.