ABOUT THE AUCPB

The All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks (AUCPB), inheriting Bolshevik principles of the R.S.D.W.P. -R.S.D.W.P.(b) - A.U.C.P.(b) - of Lenin's policiy in the CPSU, is the highest form of proletarian class organisation, advanced detachment of the working class, acting in unity with the peasantry and labour intelligentsia, standing on the Party's positions for: the gain of political power - overthrowing the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie and establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat, the destruction of private ownership over the instuments and means of production, the revival of the USSR, the further strenghtening of the proletarian interests for the complete victory of socialism and gradual transition to communism. The ideological and theoretical basis of the AUCPB is formed by Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, is their doctrine in its creative application and development in modern conditions. The AUCPB is a component of the global communist movement with the aim of communism triumphing over the whole planet.

Wednesday, 1 April 2015

FOR BOLSHEVISM - No 04 (145) APRIL 2015

Workers of all countries, unite!

FOR BOLSHEVISM INSIDE THE COMMUNIST AND WORKERS’ MOVEMENT

No 04 (145) APRIL 2015


INFORMATION ABOUT THE "CASE OF A.A. MAYEVSKY "

On March 25, 2015 Uzhgorod raymezhgorodskom district court the hearing was held on the "criminal case" RCP editor Mayevsky with the agenda "On the extension of his stay in detention." The meeting was scheduled for 11:15., but started at 1200. Characteristic was that there was no information about the time and date of the hearing neither on the bulletin board of the judge or the Internet page of the court. This was done in order to misinformation readers about the time of the court session.
At the trial, there were, as it was able to decipher two security men of just under two metres tall and weighing in under 130 kg, from the SBU unit "T" (terrorism). They tried to provoke supporters of Mayevsky to make provocative responses, which were immediately recorded on their mobile phones for their further detention and arrest.
Judge Ferens somehow came to the hearing without a judicial robe and the badge of a judge. Apparently after the briefing, there was a dispute and he flew out of his office, forgetting to throw on the robe.
Mayevsky in his speech asked to change the measure of restraint, rather than the detention in jail under a written personal commitment. He said that he himself and his fellow Communists he did not think of as criminals, but that the criminals were those who brought down the population of Ukrainian people from 52 million to 36 million people. The real criminals are those, he said, who had dropped Ukraine from a top ten most developed country in the world, to the level of the poorest African countries.
The judge’s decision, at the insistence of prosecutor Deyak was to extend Mayevsky’s jail term for another two months, until May 25, 2015. On March 26 at 2pm, at Uzhgorod administrative court, a hearing was scheduled for closure of the newspaper RCP. Judge Gavrilko, knowing that the Code of Administrative Procedure forbids him to hear the case until the completion of criminal proceedings, was prudently hiding behind a hospital sick note.
Now planned is the court session to close the edition of the newspaper "Workers' and Peasants' Truth which has been 'postponed from March 26 to April 21, 2015.

Ukraine buro of the CC AUCPB

26 March 2015

================================
IMPRISONMENT AND PROSECUTION OF THE EDITOR OF RABOCHE-KRESTYANSKAYA PRAVDA ("WORKERS' AND PEASANTS TRUTH") A.A. MAYEVSKY CONTINUES

Documents of the CC AUCPB
Information Ukraine Buro of the CC AUCPB
March 5, 2015

On February 27, 2015 there was to be held a preliminary hearing of the criminal case against the editor of "Workers' and Peasants truth" A.A. Mayevsky.
He is charged under Article 110 of the Criminal Code "violation of territorial integrity and inviolability of Ukraine" and Art. 161 of the Criminal Code "Violation of citizens' equality based on their race, nationality or religion."
Trumped-up charges, "cooked up" by the SBU, and sewn with white thread. Therefore, judge Ferens, who was to consider it for the third time wisely spent it on sick leave. The date of the next hearing has not yet been set.
On March 4, 2015, at the Uzhgorod administrative court, judge Gavrilko, was to consider the administrative case, the claim for the prosecutor of Uzhgorod regional prosecutor's office Stojko to close the newspaper “Workers’ Peasants Truth”.
Characteristic of this hearing that the defendant – A.A. Mayevsky was again for a second time not delivered to the hearing of the Administrative Court from jail by the SBU. The judge of the Administrative Court also "fell ill" and a session on "closing the newspaper" was postponed to March 27.
The prosecution prosecutor Stojko asked readers who came to the hearing: "What is your name and surname?" He began to intimidate them, by saying "write, write, one has to finish, and we’ll get to you."
Probably, it was said not just because the other day in the town of Lebedyn of Sumy region, the SBU searched and seized files of the newpapers RKP, "Hammer and Sickle", "Vpeyrod" of an ordinary reader of the newspaper, and questioned him.
Thus, here is the so-called guarantor of the Constitution that "fully applies" Art. 15 of the Constitution, which declares that public life in Ukraine is based on political, economic and ideological diversity and no ideology may be recognized by the State as mandatory and the state guarantees freedom of political activity not prohibited by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine.
Perform your duties, Poroshenko and do not to engage in political repression!

===========================================

THE DEATH BORIS NEMTSOV
Documents CC AUCPB

Assessment of the political significance of the event

Russian society has been has stirred up by the unexpected news of the murder of Boris Nemtsov. The media showered details of the crime and countless guesses – of who did it? Why? What purpose did it serve to the murderers and those who are behind them? This document is not an obituary, but an evaluation of the political meaning of the event. With regard to the whole social, political career of Nemtsov, one can say in one sentence: in all parties and in all positions was one - liberal faithful service, deeply anti-people, the exaltation of America: and over there - it is a great! But here in Russia in "this" country - it's not like that, and everything must be destroyed and remade!
Nemtsov was one of the closest associates of Yeltsin in his destruction of the socialist system and the USSR. And towards Putin, his attitude was very warm. On November 27, 1999 Nemtsov called Vladimir Putin the most worthy person of all the candidates who intend to participate in the presidential elections in Russia in 2000. He said that the next president after Yeltsin, should be Putin.
Nemtsov did not determine, nor could he determine the fate of the country. Now much more importantly is to objectively assess the place that could take and really took place the murder of Nemtsov - one of the leaders of the bourgeois-liberal opposition. Leave aside the personal, financial and other business reasons for the murder. Let the Prosecutor's Office deal with all that. Let's talk about the political reasons. Indeed, the murder occurred in the vicinity of the Kremlin, and even on the eve of a widely publicized march of the liberal opposition.
The liberal action on March 1, entitled “Vesna” ("Spring") was given the most serious importance by the liberal leadership gave the most serious importance, considering it as a significant milestone in the opposition to Putin and his team. In the media were suggested the most unexpected scenarios, including shooting, "Maidan", etc. Originally it was scheduled to hold the march in Marino - at the periphery of Moscow. Initially it was stated there were 100 thousand participants. But the murder Nemtsov confused all the cards from the organizers of the march, and led, as they say, "to change one's shoes on the go." As a result, instead of "Spring" there was a funeral march held and a completely different route - the centre of Moscow, which was allowed by the authorities on an emergency basis.
The event began at 15-00. One hour after the start, the Moscow Interior Ministry reported that the procession was attended by 16,500 people. Later, the police estimated the number of participants had grown to 20,000. Everything was quiet. Without incident. Well, well. And what slogans and "chants" were in vogue? They talked a lot about the war with Ukraine, remembering the dead Russian soldiers there and demanded to "stop the Russian machine of death." "There is still time to stop this war! No War! No War! ". Listening to this, I remember H.G. Wells and his novel "Invisible Man." Here, perhaps, more abruptly - soldiers and tanks are invisible and divisions are invisible. The Russian military created all this for sure even in Stalin's time. It is necessary to refresh the memory of Senator McCarthy - did he know about this? The marchers carried posters of Nemtsov and the words "He died for the future of Russia!" What future Nemtsov had for Russia, we can clearly see now in all its glory - it was Nemtsov (working at a considerable number government positions), Yeltsin, their liberal "associates" who built that future Russia - the complete collapse of everything that we see today. Very touching sounded the slogan "We do not forget! We do not forgive!" that very same slogan which grew up in the beginning of "perestroika", when the liberals were shouting about Stalin: “He did not forget and did not forgive." So why are they all suddenly all “cut up” under Stalin?
Showing a certain "shyness" in their criticism of Putin and the Kremlin during the procession, the liberal opposition was much more open in publications abroad. For example, political refugee Garry Kasparov in a column in The Wall Street Journal militantly said that the killing of Nemtsov "buries hopes for peaceful political change in Russia," adding that "if the changes can occur and then only by fierce mass uprising." No less an amusing idea was expressed by the founder of "Yabloko" Grigory Yavlinsky. He published an article in the Financial Times, which explicitly called for the "European Union to develop a strategy for the integration of the former Soviet Union into a united Europe" because "the true area of military confrontation extends beyond the Donbass and covers the whole of the former Soviet Union." Thank you, gentlemen, for your openness.
Well, after all - what was the purpose of killing Nemtsov? Here, perhaps, is the view outside of competition, that the murder of Nemtsov was committed to destabilize the political situation in the country, to give to the liberal opposition the symbol of a "martyr - a fighter for a just cause." Most likely this simply did not happen. Figuratively speaking, for Tefft (US Ambassador in Moscow), the deal fell through. A crowd was gathered, something was yelled, but, on the whole, everything remains calm. Just another stroll around the streets of Moscow by comprador "hamsters" and by those who seriously believe them. But the aim was clearly to create a strong spark and rapidly spreading panic, a tough police response and beautiful photos of "victims of a murderous regime." After that the idea would be to gather a crowd of perturbed metropolitan public on an ongoing basis.
Has the popularity of the liberal opposition grown as a result? No! According to the latest opinion polls trust rating: 1.3% for ex-Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin, and less than 1% - for Navalny, Nemtsov, "Yabloko" and one of its founders, Grigory Yavlinsky, Irina Khakamada, founder of the "Civic Platform" Mikhail Prokhorov. In addition, the survey showed that the majority of Russians (81%) simply did not know about the march on March 1, only 18% had heard about it. Moscow residents were more aware of the upcoming event (27%).
Without a doubt, the bulk of the marchers were representatives of various "groups" the capital's intelligentsia, which are characterized by the view of the Yeltsin era not as a period of devastation and poverty, but as a time of hope (What? The fact that I, too, will become a millionaire tycoon? And now these hopes are dashed!?). Piercing words of their ideological opponents: "It was, I remember, a country where all felt sorry and all were important. But the country was destroyed. Remind me, who? "," They have destroyed the country where I was born, my homeland. They have condemned us to homeless wandering around the earth, which has become a stranger to us, now owned by some that crawled out of the ground as the new "masters of life '."
Assessing the current political situation, we, the Bolsheviks, should have a clear ideological position on major issues: our attitude to the Liberals, and the new "actions" in the opposition movement calling itself the "Left", as well as the number of organizations which multiplies almost daily. If with the liberals everything is still more or less clear - it supports bourgeois ideology, direct and obvious enemies of the communists, then the "Left" –are the hidden enemies, it is, in fact, slightly "the soft" agents of the bourgeoisie, the real of them is to "pull apart", "tear up" and so utterly weaken the communist movement. The only reliable means of struggle against the "left" is for the consolidation of the communists - this principle, it controls every minute: what kind of person does he really protect, can I go along with him? Only in this way.

CC AUCPB


=======================================


MINSK AGREEMENT - 2 AND THE SITUATION IN UKRAINE

Statement of the Central Committee of the AUCPB

On February 12, 2015 in Minsk, talks were held in so-called "Norman format", which was attended by the leaders of Germany, France, Russia and Ukraine. The global bourgeois media have tried to create around these negotiations an unprecedented sensation, comparing the meeting in Minsk almost to the historic Yalta Conference, held in Crimea 70 years ago. The talks were covered in Minsk by five hundred journalists from all over the world.
After a sixteen hour night sitting, the heads of the "Big Four" announced the signing of the Declaration in support of "a packet of measures on fulfilling the Minsk Agreement", adopted February 12, 2015.
An assessment of the agrrement in the Belarusian capital has already been given by many media outlests and politicians. The Russian media focusing on the current government, see the Minsk-2 agreement as a success for Russian diplomacy and Putin himself. Europeans speak in the sense that the agreement in Minsk gives a chance to the peaceful settlement of the conflict and for the most part supported by the Ukrainian side. Almost the overwhelming majority of fascist neobanderov organizations of Ukraine were against the signing an agreement and call for the war to continue to the bitter end and encourage their fellow citizens towards this.
The All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks believes that the negotiations in Minsk discussed ways to resolve the crisis, a year-shaking Ukraine. In this case, the main issue is the political, without which, the conflict in the South East can not be solved, and namely this issue was not examined. Neither could it be considered at the meeting in "Norman format" because the three participants of the meeting in one degree or another were involved in the crisis situation in Ukraine.
As has been noted in the materials of the AUCPB, the main cause of the political crisis in Ukraine is a fascist coup in Kiev and the arrival in February 2014 to power of fascist neobanderovs, resulting in Ukraine of an established outright terrorist dictatorship of the reactionary forces of capital, that violated democratic rights and freedoms of citizens of Ukraine an dfirst of all Russian citizens in South-East and throughout New Russia. At the present time it is not a revelation that this coup ere perpetrated under the leadership of Western governments, especially the US, seeking to maintain its unipolar world domination, and directed against Russia with the ultimate goal of its dismemberment and destruction. Therefore nothing was dependant on the Kiev authorities in this negotiation process.
As for the leadership of Germany and France, it is quite obvious that their position is also consistent with the United States that did not participate directly in the talks in Minsk, but all the same were there as invisibly present. But Europeans well remember how both the First World War and the second began in Europe and the profits obtained by the United States, securing the leading position in the world based on human grief. We should not forget the conclusions of Stalin made in his work "Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR," in which he, by analyzing the post-war world order, said: "What guarantee is there, then, that Germany and Japan will not rise to their feet again, will not attempt to break out of American bondage and live their own independent lives? I think there is no such guarantee." Therefore, Merkel and Hollande's visit to Minsk - is to some extent the reluctance of a frightened Europe to have a major war on its doorstep. No wonder Merkel in America spoke about the undesirability of supplying "lethal weapons" to Ukraine. In addition, Merkel and Hollande also face pressure from their national companies who are not interested in a complete break with Russia, as they will lose their profits.
The conclusion is that due to the unresolved main political issue of the Minsk agreement – 2, this cannot lead to sustainable peace. They should be seen as an agreement that provides a temporary truce. The absence of a political solution leads to the Donbas over time towards a so-called "frozen conflict".
For these reasons, the question of the fascist essence of the Kiev authorities, of course, did not come up, and could not be raised at this meeting, as all the participants of the negotiations, including President Putin, represent the interests of certain oligarchic bourgeois circles of their countries, not in a hurry to expose contemporary fascism. And no matter how one of the organizers of the Minsk Summit of Heads of State, President Lukashenko, did not embrace Poroshenko, the latter not at the negotiating table, but in the dock (and his accomplices Turchinov, Yatsenyuk Nalyvaychenko, chop, Yarosh, Ljashko et al.) .
Therefore, in the second edition of the Minsk Agreement, we do not find mention of the crimes of those who bombed the city of Donbass, fired with heavy artillery at homes, killing women and children. No mention of the responsibility of those people who were burned alive in Odessa, May 2, 2014, the civilians shot in Mariupol, May 9, 2014, and destroying monuments to Lenin and Soviet soldiers - victors of fascism.
It is our political assessment of the Minsk-2 agreements, which are not fundamentally different from the first Minsk agreements on 09.05.2014 and 19.09.2014. With regard to their specific content, the following should be noted.
The declaration signed in Minsk by Russia, Ukraine, Germany and France, is just a set of phrases, and noncommittal to everyone. Roughly with the same looks are the "measures for implementing the Minsk Agreement" signed by unknown people. It follows out of the document that Kuchma - "the second President of Ukraine", whose powers are unsubstantiated, and regarding Zaharchenko and Plotnitsky in general it is not clear as to any of their official positions, assuming they have the authority, the document is not marked. It turns out that the "package of measures" was signed by people without authority. So, accordingly, it has no legal power.

The paper has a mass of uncertainties, i.e. "The package of measures ..." is a FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT, reminiscent of a clean white sheet on which each party intends to dictate in the course of negotiating their conditions of work. If the parties fail to agree on the mentioned points of the agreement, which is close to the truth, then their fulfilment will be thwarted. Due to the fact that Kiev does not recognize the DPR-LPR, it turns out that Ukraine has no one to make peace with.
With regard to the responsibilities of the parties, it should be noted: signing the declaration completely refutes the Ukrainian and Western concept that in Donbas it is not a civil war, but "only" an armed conflict between Ukraine and Russia. Poroshenko, Merkel and Hollande, having signed the Minsk Declaration, thus directly signed to the fact that Russia is not a party to the armed conflict in the Donbass. The Russian side thus took no obligation upon itself in the Minsk Declaration. But Germany and France have undertaken a number of commitments. In particular, they pledged to provide technical support for the "restoration of a segment of the banking system", which was destroyed in Donbas, together with support for the resumption by Ukraine of "social benefits", although in a blockade of Donbas by Kiev, these agreements have already been thwarted. But Kiev has a lot of obligations in the agreement, which under the current regime cannot be implemented, and therefore, remain only on paper.
Failure to implement the Minsk accords began immediately after their entry into force. For example, even the first point of the cease-fire at 00 hours 00 minutes 15 February 2015, which the agreement came into force was violated in the early hours of this date, and continues to be violated in the present: attacks by Ukrainian security forces have still not been completely stopped.
In the fourth paragraph is entrusted to the point to "start a dialogue about local elections in accordance with Ukrainian legislation" in the DPR and LPR. It is absolutely not clear who should initiate the dialogue. Therefore, it is likely that the dialogue will not start, because for Kiev, the DPR and LPR do not exist.
No less a problematic task is how the Verkhovna Rada will adopt regulations specifying the territory, "which is subject to special treatment in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On temporary order of local government in some regions of Donetsk and Lugansk regions", based on the lines set out in the Minsk memorandum dated September 19, 2014". The fact is the law legalizes the legal existence beyond the control of the Ukrainian government of areas in Donbass. That is, the Ukrainian neobanderovs, entrenched in the Verkhovna Rada, will have to legitimize the special status beyond the control of Kiev of areas of the DPR and LPR. This is extremely problematic.
The tenth paragraph provides for "the withdrawal of all foreign armed forces, military equipment, as well as mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine" and "disarmament of all illegal groups." Such an event is very difficult to imagine in the current climate. If with the withdrawal of foreign armed groups everything is clear, as their presence on the territory of Donbass and Ukraine still has not been proven, then in the case of disarmament of "illegal groups" then there remains continuous uncertainty.
Disarming the militia of Donbass can only be done if the DPR and LPR are confident that a new Ukrainian army incursion into their territory is impossible. Other circumstances of militia disarmament are difficult to imagine. Similarly, it is difficult to imagine disarmament by the Ukrainian fascist volunteer punitive battalions, which became an important element of the Kiev political system. In these paramilitary groups are tied the interests of many oligarchic forces in Ukraine. "Battalions" are not just war and politics, but also business. At this point in Ukraine there is simply no one to disarm them. And they themselves (such as "Right Sector") will not disarm. Especially because many of them have been formally legalized.
A recent report suggests that Poroshenko had requested a consideration on the introduction of peacekeepers in the east of the country, which in turn generally puts an end to the implementation of the ten points. The All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks is opposed to the introduction of any peacekeepers since it is the path to the occupation of Ukraine by NATO forces and the creation of a bridgehead by the US against Russia.
A very important place in the complex of measures attached, is the eleventh paragraph under which it stipulates "Carrying out constitutional reform in Ukraine with the entry into force by the end of 2015, of a new constitution, proposing decentralization as a key element..." Using the vagueness of this paragraph, the Verkhovna Rada has already tried to push through skimpy decentralization and cosmetic constitutional reform (their main parameters jumped over "one to one" of the failed September agreements into the February agreement). The militia has already stated its opposition to the planned fraud. For example, the official website of the New Russia leadership placed the following statement: "The sovereignty of our republics comes at a price. It was paid for by the blood of innocent civilians, not to mention the militia which defended them. Sovereignty for us it is not an empty phrase, and we do not intend to exchange it for some "gingerbread" from Kiev." And in conclusion: "The breakup of a unified Ukraine is inevitable."
A particularly heated debate at the Minsk talks revolved around the Debaltsovo "boiler". Debaltsevo is crucial for the DPR and LPR, so because of that, a 16-hour "war of nerves" was conducted in the negotiations, where President Poroshenko tried to prove that there is no boiler, and therefore tried to fix the Minsk Agreement on this strategically important point for the army Ukraine. The final point in this matter was put by the heroes of the DPR and LPR militia, to withstanding during the hours of talks in Minsk all the frenzied attacks by armed Ukrainian security bodies. After suffering losses, the militias survived and won, causing the army of fascist Bandera Ukraine significant damage. These losses were a cold shower for the fascist fighters of Kiev.
The bourgeois leaders of Russia at the Minsk talks did not take into account the interests and desires of the working people of Donbass, who fought bravely against the fascist punitive forces. The above-mentioned disadvantages of Minsk Agreement - 2 will most negatively impact on the fate of more workers of the DPR and LPR, which in their referenda have clearly and unequivocally voted in favour of state sovereignty.
Signed under pressure of Putin by heads of the DPR and LPR Zaharchenko and Plotnitsky on February 12, 2015 "The package of measures ..."ignores the will of the people of Donbass, expressed in a referendum. Misty and ornate provisions of the so-called "decentralization", as noted above us, will not be accepted by inhabitants of Donetsk and Lugansk, and it certainly adds fuel to the flames of civil war in Ukraine. The absence of a clear and unequivocal position on the recognition of the Russian language as the second state language can and does make irreconcilable the positions of the parties.
Thus, the risk of spread of the conflict to the level of the European and wider - into a Third World War - is maintained.
In view of the above, the Central Committee of the AUCPB states:
We express our full support for the just struggle of the people of New Russia (Novorossiya (DPR and LPR) against the occupying forces of the Kiev punitive fascist regime.
We believe that without a political solution to the crisis in Ukraine, involving the overthrow of the fascist neo-banderov government in Kiev, sustainable long-term peace in the region cannot be established.
From modern history it is well known that the pioneers of the anti-fascist struggle in different countries have always been communists and left-patriotic organizations. The struggle by the communists of Ukraine against fascism in the country is extremely difficult because of the terrorist anti-communist regime imposed on its entire territory. We therefore call upon the communists and activists of leftist organizations of the world to show solidarity and provide political support to Ukrainian comrades, to hold mass protests against fascism in Ukraine and the possibility of the spread of fascist plague in Europe and elsewhere in the world that can turn into a disaster for mankind. There is a need to convene a world anti-imperialist anti-fascist forum, the basic idea of which should be the fight against the threat of a Third World War.
We urge the leaders of the communist and leftist patriotic organizations to demand from their Governments that they:
- condemn the Kiev fascist regime and violation of human rights in Ukraine;
-To specific measures to establish an International Criminal Tribunal for the Kiev neo-fascist regime on the territory of modern Ukraine, Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics.

Leningrad,

February 25, 2015
-----------------------------------------------------------------


LENIN, GORBACHEV, SOBCHAK

Interview by N.A Andreeva to the television program TV-100 on 18.02.2015

Correspondant of TV 100: On February 19, 2000, Anatoly Sobchak died (now marking the 15th anniversary of that date). Sobchak was the first mayor of St. Petersburg. Under him the city of Leningrad was renamed St. Petersburg. Your attitude towards the Mayor Sobchak as a business executive and as a politician? In early March 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev became General Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee. On March 13, 1988 in "Soviet Russia" your article "I cannot give up principles" was published. Your attitude to Gorbachev after the past few years?

Nina Andreeva - Anatoly Sobchak (1937-2000, February) was the first mayor (1991-1996) of Leningrad, a city renamed by him to St. Petersburg. Sobchak was an active participant or, more precisely, one of the initiators and agents of the "democrats" to destroy what had been connected with Soviets and Soviet toponymy. Renaming the city was conducted fraudulently, by deceiving the citizens of Leningrad.
The Lenin_v_Smolnom Referendum, which the "democrats" talk about, as such, was not a referendum. It was in June 1991 a public opinion poll. And the question was worded in such a way that many did not understand where to place their "tick" on the questionnaire: "for what" and "against what." Counting of votes was carried out by the organizers of the survey and therefore at the end of counting, they announced that the majority of people of Leningrad voted "in favour" of the renaming of Leningrad to St Petersburg. (According to the "democrats", 64% of the city citizens took part in the vote, "in favour" of renaming voted 54%, i.e., "for" a name change had taken place even if the in this scam had only voted 34.5% of the population). When the data of the survey were published in the press, it was met with stormy indignation of Leningraders, an appeal was sent to Smolny, and up to Gorbachev himself. Gorbachev reassured everyone by saying that "the poll had no legal force." Everyone calmed down. And on 05 September, in the press announced the official renaming of the city of Leningrad into St. Petersburg.
Anatoly Sobchak before being elected mayor worked at the Zhdanov State University of Leningrad (LSU), and was nominated for mayor also by members of the LSU. Leningrad University has always been noted for its "democratic" positions, was a hotbed of anti-Soviet ideas, and a source of ardent conductor of counterrevolutionary trends. The vast majority of the ruling elite in the country at different times of the period of counter-revolution and still are LSU graduates (and in the past, members of the (“Ozero” ("Lake") cooperative). Sobchak was a worthy representative of the home-grown "democratic" counter-revolutionary elite of intellectuals have revealed in the 1990 years, his hatred of all things Soviet, having headed a counter-revolutionary coup and the collapse of the USSR.
Now it is no secret that all these anti-Soviet "brothers" were well fed by numerous foreign grants "to assist the establishment of democracy and transparency" in the Soviet Union, towards which the United States recently spent billions of dollars. In Moscow alone during this period functioned so many anti-Soviet "democratic" (so-called non-governmental) organizations that the list of their names alone would not fit on five A4 pages. Today, there are no less. About Sobchak. Criminal proceedings opened (introduced) against him for embezzlement of funds of the city when he was mayor. The case was initiated not by the communists, but by a prominent Democrat, political scientist Marina Salie.
Sobchak was convicted for the "disappearance" of several million (more than 100 million US dollars) from the budget, which was "not found." Money was allocated for the purchase of food for the city of Leningrad. There are other facts of fraudulent schemes by Sobchak as mayor of Saint-Petersburg. Also known are the forced evictions by Sobchak of several families from a high-end, located in the heart of the city two-story mansion, formerly owned by a senior tsarist officials. Ultimately Sobchak had taken over (for personal use) this luxury mansion. There were court trials over this matter, but the victims, of course, lost their case.
Sobchak only just escaped from prosecution abroad (through Finland to France). Following the appointment of Putin as the successor to Yeltsin in December 31, 1999 the case was closed. Sobchak decided to return to Russia. When returning in February 2000, Sobchak died under mysterious and unexplained circumstances. Marina Salie also somehow quietly left the political scene ... On March 12, 2012 she died. The funeral took place quietly and silently, not like they bury the "democrats".
To your question – is the mayor a politician or business executive – here is the answer. The mayor is also a politician and business executive. As a politician, he defines and controls the psychological situation in the city, working with the media, etc. When under Sobchak from 1991-1993, when the "democrats" went mad with permissiveness and plundering the country’s wealth, they screamed furiously at rallies, calling for reprisals - "Communists to the gallows!" The mayor ... as a business executive is responsible of course, for the use of funds allocated from the state budget for the city. How Sobchak actually used these city funds, has already been mentioned.

Addition to the interview:
Today, the "democratic" public continues to work on the collapse of the country, organising in Moscow, and not only demonstrations in support of the pro-Nazi regime in Ukraine, but shows their pro-American solidarity. On February 18 the press service of the "democrats" of the "Yabloko" party (leader Yavlinsky) published an article in which calls for Russia to hand back (return) Crimea to the Kiev junta (by convening an international conference in the Crimea), demanding that President Putin's review his foreign policy (of course in line with U.S. interests), puttings forward its own program (literally) the "de-Bolshevization of Russia" (!). "Yabloka" with its strategic goal, considers convening in the foreseeable future a Russian Constituent Assembly with the task of twenty-first century - the "restoration of historical continuity with pre-Bolshevik Russia through the convening of the institution, and on this basis, a state of responsible citizens, whose core values are freedom, law, property, social solidarity ". To consider enemies of Soviet power and the Soviet people as "responsible citizens" is absurd. These "responsible citizens" usurped our nation's property, carved it up with thieves-oligarchs and stuff their own pockets using our "privatised-stolen" public property. In the new leadership of the country (after they remove Putin) the "democrats" have tipped Khodorkovsky with Navalny, who are already involved on criminal charges for fraud. Further, the proposed "Yabloka" demands for a change of policy of the Russian leadership is not new, but a repetition to a certain degree of the demands of the NTS, in the late 90s of the twentieth century ordering Yeltsin to implement measures on de-Sovietization of Soviet society. This was stated by us at the II Congress of the AUCPB.

Correspondent. In Leningrad were many monuments to Lenin. At present, most of them have been removed. There is a proposal for the establishment in Razliv on the territory of Lenin museum an avenue to which can be transferred earlier removed monuments of Lenin. And how many monuments should there be generally?

N.A. - Relative to the monuments in general. A monument is a sign, a symbol of a certain historical period, a certain historical period in the life of the people. We Bolsheviks are against the demolition of any monuments. It is necessary to preserve these symbols. It is necessary to know and respect their history, whatever it was. A removal of monuments is to a certain extent, vandalism, a neglect of our ancestors. Monuments to Lenin were also created, as a rule, by the best sculptors, and for this reason they should be maintained. Of course, in all to a necessary measure. In Leningrad, a city of five million, there were many monuments to Lenin (in the city, in the territory of enterprises, institutions). Today there are only a few. Under Sobchak, around the removal of the memorial bust of Lenin at the Moscow station there was a whole campaign to protect the monument by the communists. We were on guard near the monument day and night, not allowing it to be removed. But after many days of resistance by force of militia (or any other system) denting the defenders, the monument was removed and taken away. Now there is a bust of Peter I.
How many monuments should there be? Just any kind of bust is harmful and leads to the installation of monuments lacking artistic value. The amount depends on the historical significance of the individual.
Vladimir Ilyich Lenin was in the history of civilization among the greatest thinkers and politicians and only due to his activity and intelligence could lead to Russia stepping from one socio-economic system (the feudal-bourgeois, capitalist) to another – to socialism. As you know, Karl Marx believed all socio-economic formations, socio-political systems (slave, feudal, capitalist) only the prehistory of mankind on the road to communism - a classless society, where people are really free where getting food and housing is not a problem at the existing level of scientific and technical progress, where people will be able to enjoy all the benefits of culture, sports, family, parenting, enjoy the benefits of scientific and technological progress, where every man really becomes a person. Karl Marx was a great theorist, creator of the only scientific theory of the development of civilization ("Marx discovered the laws of history, has placed the proletariat at the helm", Mayakovsky). But theory without practice is dead. Practice without theory is blind. Vladimir Ilyich merged Marx's theory and practice of building socialism. And in this he is head and shoulders above all the greatest personalities in history. There are many versatile highest evaluations of Lenin by outstanding writers, scientists, politicians and statesmen. Lenin loved the people. Therefore there was a sincere desire to place in their city, region, a bust or monument of Lenin.
On the establishment of a park in Razliv at the Lenin Museum and gathering Lenin monuments in one place - I think it is right, especially as the whereabouts of the demolished monuments are not known and the condition they are in one can only guess. The time will come, and they will be returned to their places.
Correspondent. - What is your opinion about Gorbachev, 20 years later?

N.A. - Gorbachev was elected General Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee at the extraordinary plenary session of the CPSU Central Committee, on March 11, 1985 An interesting coincidence that three years later almost to the day, on March 13 1988, "Sovetskaya Russia" published my article "I cannot give up principles." This article was a milestone in the history of the country, the party and the development of the counter-revolution, dividing the whole of society into two irreconcilable camps: the supporters of the counter-revolution - the path to nowhere (these were a minority) and supporters of socialism, which had to be saved. All the adverse events, which I warned of in my article, have now become a reality. The publication of my article was the beginning of the star sunset of Gorbachev in the political arena. His status as a traitor and a traitor to the motherland was confirmed by Gorbachev himself in 1992, speaking at a Turkish university. There, he said that "the purpose of his life was to destroy socialism." Gorbachev played in history a more sinister role than Hitler. Gorbachev betrayed the Soviet people, the international working-class and national liberation movement. Gorbachev gave away the Great Victory over fascism, which had cost the lives of millions of Soviet people. He betrayed the people's democracies. Gorbachev shook the faith of the disadvantaged people in the world in that it is possible to build a society without exploitation, without unemployment, where there is friendship between the peoples of different nationalities and religions, where each nation can develop their culture and speak their own language, where everyone can get free higher education to work in accordance with their vocation and abilities. Gorbachev historically today is responsible for the collapse of a great country, for the blood that is shed in Donbass. Today, many people dream about past times, are nostalgic for socialism, the 7 or 6-hour working day and a constant without delay payment of wages, the free quality health care, student scholarships for all students, sufficient for life, about the great pride of our country, defeated German fascism, through to the pride of being a citizen of a great country the USSR, living a quiet peaceful life.
History develops in a spiral. We Bolsheviks believe that when raises to a new level, a return will happen towards socialist values and the revival of socialism. We are working towards this.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


1.UK KOREAN FRIENDSHIP HOLD SUCCESSFUL SKYPE MEETING AND ADOPT
RESOLUTION ON US GERM WARFARE AND CIA TORTURE
The UK Korean Friendship Association hosted a meeting via Skype at
1400 hours on February 26th . Participating in the meeting were KFA
members from different parts of the country including the far north
eastern city of Newcastle Upon Tyne . Dermot Hudson KFA Official
Delegate and chair of the Juche Idea Study Group of England
participating in the meeting from the UK KFA office in London. Also
participating in the meeting was general secretary of the New
Communist Party
Andy Brooks who is also a KFA member.

Participants strongly denounced the hypocrisy of the US imperialists
for their "human rights " campaign saying in fact that the US was the
country that had committed serious crimes.

It was pointed out that during the Korean war delegations of the
British peace movement visited Korea and saw for themselves the germ
warfare committed by the US imperialists in Korea . Books
published at the time fully exposed this. The crime of US germ warfare
must be fully exposed . KFA
members pointed out that the germ warfare of the US was in violation
of international conventions and protocols such as the Geneva
convention.

Attention was also drawn to US crimes during the Vietnam war and also
in Iraq. The US were also responsible for the Bhopal disaster in India
and for massive exploitation in the third world.

The US CIA carried out torture against people in secret prisons that
were not on US soil but were in other countries but hypocritically
tried to take issue with non existent "labour camps " which were
allegedly located inside the DPRK. The KFA Official Delegate said on 9
visits to the DPRK he had never seen a labour camp. The US had carried
out illegal imprisonment and toture at Guantanamo bay on the territory
of Cuba and other places throughout the world , this was a fact.

The meeting concluded by adopting the following resolution



RESOLUTION OF UK KFA MEETING ON SKYPE-26TH 1400HRS FEBRUARY 2015

This meeting has been called to expose the phony human rights campaign
of US imperialism against the Democratic People?s Republic (DPRK) and
to expose the real ?human rights violator ?the US itself so it may be
indicted before the court of history for its crimes against humanity.
The
?Human rights ?campaign against the DPRK it is not just hypocritical
But it also serves as a smokescreen to divert attention away from real
Human rights abuses in the USA.
These are far numerous to list as the USA is known for
Invading many countries and also for racial discrimination and for
phone tapping and electronic eavesdropping . It is rightly known as a
?land barren of human rights ? . However the most serious human rights
abuses committed by the US were the use of germ warfare during the
Korean war against the DPRK and the torture carried out by the CIA in
the years 2001-2006 .
The US imperialists waged biological warfare in Korea in the 1950-1953
in violation of the Geneva Protocol. The use of biological weapons was
confirmed by an International Scientific Commission which included the
respected British scientist Professor Joseph Needham and also by
confessions of captured US personnel . In carrying out biological
warfare against the Korean people the US imperialists utilised the
services of Japanese war criminal Shiro Ishii of the notorious Unit 731.

During the Korean war the US carried out over 800 germ warfare
sorties . The death toll from the US germ warfare ran into thousands .
This was a barbaric crime that was much worse than those committed by
Hitler in the second world. We believe it is high time for the US to
stop covering this crime and come clean finally about it.

Recently, the US senate issued a report opening to the world torture
committed by the CIA over a long period . Of course the CIA had long
been infamous for assassination, terrorism, dirty tricks and
interference . It earned notoriety as the shock brigade of US
imperialism , Its role was exposed in the 1970s by a defector from the
CIA Philip Agee. However under the guise of the so-called ?war on
terror ? the CIA became a major human rights violator committing
torture and detaining suspects without trial.
The CIA operated a network of secret prisons around the world and
indulging kidnapping and ?rendition ? as part of its Detention and
Interrogation Programme and carried out torture of detainees. The
programme authorized CIA officers to use extreme interrogation
techniques, including sleep deprivation, water boarding , painful
stress positions, dietary manipulation, walling, 'rectal rehydration'
or rectal feeding, etc. These techniques were most barbaric.

Thus the US stands condemned and guilty for crimes against humanity.
We demand that the UN Committee on Human Rights and other
international bodies organise a full and proper investigation into
these crimes committed by the US. The UN must act in a fair and
impartial way and must not be afraid of the US.

ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY BE THE MEETING AT 14.50 HRS 26 FEBRUARY
(text available here
http://juche007-anglo-peopleskoreafriendship.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/resolution-on-us-germ-warfare-and-cia.htm-please copy and distribute and get your trade union , student union or community group to
adopt)
2. UK KFA CONDEMNS FOAL EAGLE AND KEY RESOLVE
BRIEF STATEMENT BY UK KFA CONDEMING FOAL EAGLE AND KEY RESOLVE
UK KOREAN FRIENDSHIP ASSOCIATION
London 25 February 2015
The UK Korean Friendship Association totally condemns the
planned holding of the "Key Resolve and "Foal Eagle " military
exercises by the United States imperialists and their south Korean
puppet cohorts . The exercises start on the 2nd of March and will
last untill the 24th of April .
Given the duration and scope of
the exercises plus the large amount of troops and miltiary hardware
involved , these exercises constitute a start threat to peace on the
Korean peninsula and the world as well as a severe challenge to the
sovereignty and independence of the Denocratic People's Republic of
Korea !.
Some media outlets have stated that "Australia, Canada,
Denmark, France and Britain plan to participate in the drill". This
smacks of an attempt by the US imperialists and south Korean puppets
to try and create a multi-naitonal force to overpower and stifle
People's Korea . We wholeheartedly condemn any British participation ,
however minor , in these exercises . Britain must not get mixed up in
the schemes of US imperialism nor dragged into a second Korean War. It
is time for the UK to have an independent policy on Korea and develop
relations of friendship with the DPRK . It is indeed regrettable that
this has been announced when a goodwill delegation of the DPRK, the
DPRK Para Ensemble is touring the UK .

We call for the immediate cancellation of the exercises and for the
withdrawal of any proposed British participation in these insidious
war exercises.

UK KFA
====================================

Monday, 2 March 2015

FOR BOLSHEVISM - No 03 (144) MARCH 2015

Workers of all countries, unite!

FOR BOLSHEVISM INSIDE THE COMMUNIST AND WORKERS’ MOVEMENT

No 03 (144) MARCH 2015


THE TRIAL OF A.A.MAYEVSKY SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 13, POSTPONED

The appointed for February 13 in Uzhgorod trial of the chief editor of the newspaper " Workers 'and Peasants' Truth, secretary of the Central Committee of the AUCPB of the Bureau of the Central Committee for Ukraine, Moldova and Transnistria AA Mayevsky did not take place because of the "absence of a defendant at the trial." The judge was not swayed by the situation that Mayevsky has already spent more than 70 days in a detention cell of Transcarpathian jail (UIN number 9 - penal institutions) in Uzhgorod.
Mayevsky was not brought from prison to court. Earlier, A.A.Mayevsky, considered by the Ukrainian authorities as an "especially dangerous criminal" announced a hunger strike lasting well over days. The reason for his hunger strike – a ban on receiving newspapers, writing letters, for the right to practice his professional intellectual activity as a writer.
The court meeting was held under conditions of secrecy - no information about the meeting was available, along with the ban on the presence of journalists in the hall, with the desire not to allow into the courtroom of comrades who came that day from different regions of Ukraine. The judge and the prosecutor refused to announce their names. Their names were given via the court clerk.
The date of the court trial for the "crimes" of A.A. Mayevsky has been moved to 27th of February. The court case dealing with the banning of the publication of the newspaper "Workers' and Peasants Truth" is scheduled for March 4th.

Information of the CC AUCPB

=============================
TRIAL OF A.A.MAYEVSKY TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 13 IN UZHGOROD

NEW INFORMATION ON MAYEVSKY
From a telephone conversation with close relative of A.A. Mayevsky in Mukachevo, it turns out that on February 13 in Uzhgorod will be a full hearing to review the "case" of Mayevsky. Obviously, to begin an in-depth consideration of the case.
Anatoly Arkadevich Mayevsky is healthy, but has lost a lot of weight - affected by comfortable conditions of detention in jail. His general mood is cheerful and militant. Letters and parcels can be sent to him, but are subject to being taken and “sorted" into what can and cannot be handed to him.
=========================

STATEMENT BY THE UKRAINE BURO OF THE CC AUCPB

Challenges of the XXI century

Having made a "bouquet" of criminal offenses, such as: "Creating unforeseen by law paramilitary or armed groups" (Art. 260 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine "," Creating a criminal organization "(Art. 255 of the Criminal Code)," Actions aimed at violent change or destruction of the constitutional order or the seizure of state power "(v. 109)," treason "(p. 111)," Attempt on the life of a statesman or public figure "(v. 112)," The destruction, the destruction or desecration of monuments of history and culture "( Art. 298), "mass unrest" (v. 294), "incitement to commit acts that threaten civil order" (Art. 295 of the Criminal Code), "unlawful conduct with a weapon, ammunition or explosives" (p. 263), " The capture of state or public buildings or structures "(v. 341) - this is an incomplete list of criminal offenses that are carried out in a completed form with the blessing of the leaders of the US and the EU, the Ukrainian coup leaders Poroshenko, Paruby, Yatsenyuk, Turchynov, Avakov, Petrenko, Klitschko, Tyagnibok, Tymoshenko and many ministers, members of the Armed Forces of the "coalition" and crazy citizens of Ukraine who support them.
After coming to power in February 2014, the coup leaders continue to build a list of their criminal acts. If during the "Maidan", Tyagnibok, Tymoshenko, Yatsenyuk Turchynov yelled that Ukrainian tanks have to travel along "Red Square" (war propaganda, Art. 436 of the Criminal Code), nowadays these figures are not averse to engage in the planning, preparation, initiation and waging of aggressive war (Art. 437 of the Criminal Code), "a violation of the laws and rules of war" (Art. 438 of the Criminal Code), use "violence against the population in the area of military operations" (Art. 433 of the Criminal Code), "genocide" (Art. 442 of the Criminal Code). While this criminal clique feels unpunished, since the "Washington Regional Committee" is behind them, but in respect of a true, honest, disinterested, not standing for their selfish interests, but for the fate of the working people, the "boss" has given the go-ahead for neutralization. It is known that prosecutions have begun against leaders of the Communist Party - Simonenko P.N., the Progressive Socialist Party - Vitrenko N.M., RPU - Bondarchuk A.V., Mariupol editor of the newspaper "I want the USSR" Sergey Dolgov back in June 2014 was illegally arrested by punitive bodies and is now missing. In June 2014 the prosecution began against journalist, writer, editor, of "Workers' and Peasants Truth" A.A Mayevsky. After a nearly six-month criminal investigation, on November 28, 2014, Mayevsky was arrested for 60 days and was in the detention centre of Uzhgorod SBU, only for the fact that in №6 «Workers' and Peasants Truth" was published an interview with the leader of the DPR Paul Gubarev by Russian media (information from the Internet), as well as informed to the reader the real name of the grandfather of President of Ukraine Poroshenko-Valtsman. Because of this, he was accused of possible inciting ethnic hatred (Art. 161 of the Criminal Code) between Jews and Ukrainians and violation of territorial integrity and inviolability of Ukraine (Art. 110 of the Criminal Code).
Forensic linguistic expertise of the newspaper "Workers' and Peasants truth» №6 for 2014, which is based on the accusation is highly conditional, illegal and ordered in nature. No reputable scientist linguist in the world can give a comprehensive answer, based on objective evidence. Even in the nineteenth century, the poet F.I. Tyutchev wrote: "We cannot predict how our words will be responded to, and we are given sympathy, as we are given grace."
On January 26, 2015 at 11:00 am, at the end of pre-trial detention, Uzhgorod district court reviewed the case of Mayevsky on the extension of pre-trial detention and extended it for another 60 days until March 26, 2015. Characteristic in this tribunal is that judge A.N. Ferens, leading the case of Mayevsky, hid behind a sick note, and hastily appointed judge Lemesh who held a meeting with a clear violation of substantive and procedural law: the meeting was held without a lawyer of the accused. The judge rudely interrupted defender Mayevsky, not allowing him to exercise the right to defence.
Attendant of Femid, Lemesh did not take into account the fact that the "crime", in which Mayevsky is accused of occurred in June 2014, and the tightening of criminal law of the articles incriminating Mayevsky were legalized only in October 2014. We understand that the judge ordered, and gave the go-ahead, and that what now hangs over the judge is the rejected by the Venice Commission, the law on lustration. But first you – the investigators, prosecutors, judges - handcuffed a journalist and writer Mayevsky, and then these same coup leaders will put handcuffs on you, that is against Mayevsky have been committed criminal offenses under Articles 371, 372, 374, 375: "Unlawful arrest", "Attraction of obviously innocent to criminal liability", "Violation of the right to protection," "ruling judge (judges) has obviously no jurisdiction judgment, decision or judgment."
The Bandera-Zionist government of Ukraine during it rule has killed tens of thousands of fellow citizens, starting with Maidan. Millions of refugees seeking shelter from the Donbas, 30% of the industry of the Ukrainian state destroyed, which was built under Soviet power. Here is the actual price of, and, apparently, not yet complete, your slogan "Glory to Ukraine" and "live a new life", "Heroes of Glory."
In the dungeons of jail of the SBU in Uzhgorod languishes a senior officer, journalist and publicist, who with weapon in hand defended our Soviet country, performing his international duty, and defended all of you: the president, deputies, ministers, even when you went to school or daycare. And not for a personal prosperous life, bank accounts, yachts, chic car and villas was Bolshevik Communist Mayevsky struggling for, huddling in a tiny room and spending a meager pension on the publication of the press. For the happiness of all working people, for peace on Earth.
Judge your own actions yourselves. Somewhere deep inside you must understand that Mayevsky, Dolgovy, Simonenko, Vitrenko, Bondarchuk are right, but lackey-animal fear, serving the powers that be, by committing iniquity, you are sawing off the branch on which you sit.

Ukraine Bureau of the Central Committee of the AUCPB

===============================

LETTER BY A.A. MAYEVSKY

More than one and a half months have passed (from November 28, 2014), since I have been in a Transcarpathian jail (UIN number 9 - penal institutions) in Uzhgorod. I have already gradually become accustomed to living in a new environment (about this - in a subsequent letter).
In addition to almost complete isolation from the outside world, we, the prisoners are actually deprived of information about what is happening in Ukraine in the world. If in December, at least once a week, the newspaper "Uzhgorod", with very little information was brought in to read, then this year for two weeks the newspaper "The Prisoner" (an independent Christian newspaper) was brought in, which is issued once in three months and aims for the convicted to seek salvation by turning to God (it is published in Ukraine and the United States in Russian and English languages).
Fortunately, our family though sometimes throw in newspapers from which you can extract information about current events. True, most of the newspapers are nationalist (i.e. everything bad that happens in the world - is the fault of Russia, and everything good in the world are the United States, the West). But even with such a one-sided information, I think we can draw some conclusions.

January 15, 2015
A. Mayevsky, secretary of the AUCPB,
Editor of "Workers' and Peasants truth" (Raboche-Krestyanskaya Pravda)

OUVP No 9, ul. Dovzhenko, 8a
Uzhgorod, Transcarpathian region., Ukraine
88000
======================================

WHO ARE YOU WITH RUSSIA?

Challenges of the XXI century

On January 11, millions of French people (3.7 million - according to the press) went on a march of solidarity over the seventeen dead victims of the terrorist attacks of 7 - 9 January. In the French capital, Paris, in the "march of solidarity" took part more than 1.5 million people. In the first rows of marchers, along with the relatives of the deceased, were the leaders and heads of government of more than 40 countries, led by French President Francois Oland and German Chancellor Angela Merkel.
The farewell ceremony was held in the main synagogue in Paris. 17 candles were lit signifying the number of victims.
The terrorist attack occurred on 7 January, when three unidentified people of Arab nationality attacked the Paris editorial office of the satirical weekly "Charly Ebdo" - the man who for many years published mocking caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad, and deeply offended the feelings of millions of Muslim believers all over the world and fueling religious strife between Muslims and Christians. The attackers shouted: "This is revenge for the Mohammed!", "Allah Akbar" ("Allah is great!").
After the terrorist attack attackers brothers Kuashi (Said, '32 and Sherif, '34) took a car and took refuge in a printing house, 35 km from Paris.
The next day, January 8, in Paris, police officer who had served in the police just 15 days was killed by a female.
On January 9, kosher food store in the Jewish quarter of Paris was attacked. Ahmedi Coulibaly (originally from Senegal) killed 4 people and took 15 hostages.
On the same day, the police carried out an "operation to neutralize the terrorists." During the operation, as reported in the press, 88,000 (!) police were involved (and this is against three terrorists). All the terrorists were killed and the hostages freed.
It is noted that Said and Sherif Kuashi, as well as 18-year-old Hamid Murad (to some sources, was killed during a raid, and according to another - he voluntarily surrendered to the police) belonged to the organization "Al-Qaeda", Yemen.
According to Ahmedi Coulibaly, he belonged to the organization "Islamic State", and claimed revenge for fellow Palestinians from the Gaza Strip. Ahmedi Coulibaly is closely associated with the Kuashi brothers, noting that they belonged to the same Islamist group.
French President Francois Oland said: "Our country is united, we can answer for this." But this is by far not the case.
According to Mohammed Mrabi, a former employee of the weekly "Charly Ebdo" Paris is a quarter of a step away from a true massacre. "The French hate the Arabs. And they do not understand why they should responsible for the actions of three crazy people. Hooligans attack people in Arab neighbourhoods. Police can barely keep the city from descending into chaos."
So not much can be said about any "unity of the nation". Similarly, as in Ukraine, ethnic strife has been rekindled to set Ukrainians against Russians, the West of the country is opposed to the East, in the Donbass region a fratricidal war has been unleashed - and in France the French are opposed to the Arabs, with Christians and Muslims pitted against each other.
Those in power are doing everything to play off different groups of workers (ethnic, religion) with each other and divert their attention from the main contradictions of the modern era, the contradictions between labour and capital, to divert their attention from the common enemy of the working people - the bourgeoisie, and to set them against each other.
The age old famous ancient principle - "Divide and conquer!" continues to be implemented
It is also noteworthy that on the "march of solidarity" there was no US President Barack Obama. It becomes clear who the customer of this terrorist act really is - US imperialism, Zionist capital.
The US is doing everything possible to as tightly as possible, tie its allies into its policies - policies aimed at world domination and the establishment of the so-called "New World Order" - (and, at the same time, competitors) on EU-NATO relations, to speak with one voice on the conquest and subjugation of Russia.
At the same time a blow is dealt to France, one of Europe's largest economies and a key EU country and the euro zone.
It is possible that another large-scale terrorist attack may soon overtake Germany and other, leading EU countries.
Noteworthy and the date of the terrorist attack in Paris - January 7, the first day of Christmas according to the Orthodox calendar.
Russia has been asked a question – who are you with? With us, with Muslims, with the majority of countries in the world oppressed by Zionist capital and subjected to constant aggression by imperialist US-NATO-Israel? Or are you with this rotten and decaying West?
The answer to that question by Soviet Russia, the Soviet Union would be clear and defined - our Soviet country has always been on the side of the oppressed and exploited peoples and nations.
But how does bourgeois Putin's Russia answer this call?

January 16, 2015

A.A. Mayevsky
Secretary of the CC AUCPB,
Editor of "Workers' and Peasants truth"

Uzhgorod, OHR number 9
Transcarpathian region, Ukraine




==============================
THE CASE OF A.A. MAYEVSKY. A JUDICIAL FARCE.
AUCPB Newsline
03/02/2015

Information from the courtroom

On January 26 at 11:00 am in the hall of Uzhgorod city district court (Transcarpathian region.) another judicial farce over the editor of "Workers' and Peasants truth" Anatoly Arkadevich Mayevsky took place.
Into the courtroom Anatoly Arkadevich was delivered, accompanied by security guards and handcuffed, along with two repeat offenders. During the court session, the three of them were held in a metal cage, deprived of the possibility to communicate with the audience in the hall.
Comrades from Mukachevo, Uzhgorod, as well as otherdistricts came to the court to support A.A. Mayevsky.
Court has repeatedly delayed the session due to an "illness" of Judge A.N. Ferenc. Thus, sessions were cancelled on December 26 and January 22 and on January 26 the judge allegedly became ill again. The Court staff has stated several times that on 26 January there would be no court session (apparently in the hope that sympathizers would leave), but in the end, the case was immediately assigned to another judge – A.N. Lemesh.
Immediately after the start of the session, the prosecutor confirmed the demand to leave the political prisoner in custody for another 60 days, as the crime committed by Mayevsky was considered to be "particularly dangerous." Mayevsky made a petition for his release from prison and the change of measure from custodial restraint over to house arrest instead. Immediately thereafter, the court adjourned and "went into meeting," and after 40 minutes, judge Lemesh announced his decision - to extend the detention for further 60 days, citing a "particularly dangerous" crime: separatism (because the pages of "Workers' and Peasants' truth ' gives truthful information about what is happening in Donbass), inciting ethnic hatred, and has a "detrimental effect" on the newspaper readers.
After the announcement of the court ruling, communist journalist and A.A. Mayevsky in handcuffs was sent back to jail. During those six months, whilst the investigation has been underway, the country has changed and tougher laws are now in place.
Conditions in jail, of course, are not like a "holiday resort" – the prisoner has dramatically lost weight, but he is not broken. On his active nature, weigh down the effects of mainly complete isolation and lack of information.
And if in France, journalists are killed by foreign Islamist terrorists, then in Ukraine,the authorities themselves are killing journalists they dislike. Editor of "I want the USSR" Sergei Dolgov in Mariupol was kidnapped and possibly killed, apartments of independent journalists are repeatedly raided and searched by police and people put behind bars. Russian-language newspapers have ceased publication due to "financial difficulties". Thus local newspapers in Russian, "Working Class" and "Workers' and Peasants' truth 'for six months have been crushed, and many do not read the newspaper "2000".
But those newspapers which are loyal to the authorities, as always, are circulated on a regular basis and without any financial difficulties, systematically printing vicious anti-Russian materials and cartoons.

N.I. Boychuk

1/26/15, Uzhgorod

THE ANTI-IMPERIALIST INDEPENDENCE FRONT OF BRITAIN ISSUES STATEMENT CALLING FOR THE RELEASE OF A.A MAYEVSKY OF THE UKRAINE AUCPB

THE ANTI-IMPERIALIST INDEPENDENCE FRONT OF BRITAIN

25th of January 2015
The Anti-Imperialist Independence Front of Britain today issued the following statement concerning the arrest and jailing of comrade A.A Mayevsky head of the All Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks in the Ukraine and editor of Workers' and Peasants truth ;

The Anti-Imperialist Independence Front of Britain are shocked to learn that on the 28th of November 2014 A A Mayevsky the editor of Workers and Peasants Truth " was jailed for 60 days by the oligarchic fascist regime of Ukraine.
This is an outrageous attempt by the Ukrainian fascist regime to silence opposition and press and repress communists in the Ukraine. The blood soaked Ukrainian fascist regime , the descendants of Bandera and the Galician SS , is a puppet of US imperialism and world imperialism.

We demand that comrade AA Mayevsky is released from jail and all charges against him are dropped .Furthermore the repression of communists and anti-imperialists in the Ukraine must be stopped.

AIIFB


===========================================
EVENTS IN UKRAINE
02/01/2015
Source http://novorus.info/

Mutiny in the rear of Kiev
(Battalions of nationalists state their refusal to subordinated to the leadership of Ukraine)
The leader of the "right sector" Dmitry Yarosh took the initiative to create a parallel to the General Staff, since the incumbent "brain" of the Ukrainian army is divorced from reality. According to Yarosh, the new structure will be in contact with the official leadership of the troops, but decisions will be made independently.
Yarosh’s statement was made almost simultaneously with street demonstrations of militants from the volunteer battalion "Aydar". Earlier, the international human rights organization Amnesty International had accused the battalion of war crimes. On Friday it was reported that "Aydar" decided to disband. But the militants already have support in the supreme bodies of state power: the former battalion commander Sergei Melnychuk now meets in the Verkhovna Rada. Naturally, they did not agree with the dissolution, and came on Friday to demand their own at the Ministry of Defence.
The Aydar members managed to break down the door to the institution and place tyres in front of the building. As a result, they have achieved from the leadership of the Defense Ministry assurances that the battalion will not be dispersed, but on the contrary, to give them new weapons and everything they need.
Most interesting is that contradictions exist not only between territorial battalions of nationalists and the leadership of the army, but also within the Armed Forces. According to press reports, the new head of the General Staff may become General Gennady Vorobyov, who for many years served in Ukraine, but was hit by lustration. For the sake of him, deputies even had to change the law in order to return to the ranks of the military a professional. Vorobyov may replace the current Chief of Staff Victor Muzhenko.
Muzhenko on Thursday became famous for his statement that he had no evidence of regular participation of Russian troops in the armed conflicts in Ukraine. And it turned out that the head of the General Staff in a moment destroyed the entire structure of the Kiev propaganda. After all, every day news about the country has been reported to the people about wrecked airplanes and helicopters, tanks destroyed and captured Russian spies. It was found that people should not believe all this, and that Ukrainian soldiers are "defending" their mother country only from their own citizens.
It turns out that among the security forces thrives complete disorganization which threatens to escalate into an outright "Makhnovshchina."

Here is an interview with Lieutenant-General of the Russian army reserve Viktor Sobolev, who believes that the current situation shows the complete incapacity among Ukrainian troops and volunteer battalions.

Sobolev:

- Discussing the volunteer battalions in Ukraine, recalls a historical experience. After the Germans invaded Ukraine in 1941, out of inhabitants of the western regions of the country were created the SS Division "Galicia" battalions "Nachtigall", "Roland". These punitive formations burned down the village of Khatyn in Belarus, and Babi Yar, too, is on their conscience. But then on the orders of Germany, these fighters were sent to the front. It would seem that they had a serious ideological motivation, and their hands stained up their elbows with blood, but, in their first battle these formations were routed.
Now we see a repetition of the story. Nationalist battalions are ready to be punitive, but can not fight. Yes, and they were not trained for this, but only for the riots on Maidan and the capture of administrative buildings. Although they crave victories.

- How dangerous for Kiev are the allegations of insubordination of nationalist battalions?

- The nationalists are correct in that the Ukrainian army has collapsed. The new Minister of Defence of Ukraine came from the Ministry of Interior, all professionals removed from the General Staff and the Ministry. Now they basically can not organize effective actions of the troops. Unprofessional management, hastily recruited during the mobilization of soldiers - such an army is unfit for action. The General Staff has no one able to organize the interaction between departments and branches of the military, between the infantry and artillery.

- Yarosh talks about the formation of a parallel of the General Staff. Will it be as effective as the old one?

- Who is Yarosh? How can he create a General Staff? It's just ridiculous. Yarosh’s idea is similar to frank delirium. Such initiatives can only make for an even greater disorganization. Although I understand why the militants of volunteer battalions are outraged. They see the lack of professionalism of the High Command, but at the same time do not want to fight and can not fight but hope that the fight will be fought for them by someone else. In fact Yarosh said publicly that there has been in fact for a long time - said the co-chairman of the Popular Front of New Russia Konstantin Dolgov. - Now in Ukraine there are about fifty staffs, and each of them makes its own decisions. There is the General Staff of the Armed Forces, which has its headquarters at the Ministry of Interior, and headquarters inside battalions. Any oligarch middling has one in their field, and sometimes several subordinate battalions. The oligarch is free to determine the structure formation, to finance it, to supply it.

For militia of Novorossia, the fact of fragmentation of power structures of Ukraine plays into their hands. If all security forces were to interact, they can carry out more mass killing of innocent people in the Donbass. But it is good that there is a discord.

- Can battalions really form a parallel General Staff?

- You have to understand that the main threat to civilians Donbass comes from regular troops. Territorial battalions can be effective only with the army. True, we should not underestimate these battalions. Many of them are well armed, and not only with small arms but also heavy armor, cannon artillery, multiple rocket launchers.

- What could be the extent of the conflict between the armed forces and volunteer battalions?

- New feuds and new feudal wars. It can reach a stage that one oligarch who has three battalions, declares war on an oligarch from the neighboring region, which has two battalions. Actually, we are already seeing this in Krivoy Rog and other cities, where some oligarchs "squeeze out" the property of others, seized the mayor's office with the help of the armed forces.

- Discord began in the conduct of the Ukrainian army.

- It can lead to a breach of comma-nd and control. But the main trouble for the army is it's underfunding and lack of understanding of the soldiers and officers of the tasks they perform in Donbass. For instance, a man is called into Mariupol and forced to shoot at his relatives in Donetsk. A significant part of the personnel does not want to fight. The interrogations by militia of captured Ukrainian officers show that they are in a demoralized condition and do not know what they are fighting for. They do not want to die for the interests of the oligarchs Poroshenko, Kolomoiskiy or Akhmetov.
Political analyst Stanislav Byshok believes that the chaos in the management of law enforcement agencies in Ukraine is quite logical.
- A withdrawal of territorial battalions from subordination to Kiev is possible. In principle, it would be in the spirit of post-Maidan Ukraine. We remember that after February 1917 in Russia and Ukraine, the political situation developed in the context of the formation of parallel authorities (dual power). In Ukraine was the Central Rada and the Provisional Government operated in parallel. After Maidan, Poroshenko started looking for ways to rein in the radicals, as they had fulfilled their mission. But that did not work.
Battalions failed to show progress in the battle, and now manifest themselves in "tegmental" democracy, as in the situation with the Ministry of Defense. And they declare that they consider themselves the real power, and therefore they should be considered. Like, let the civil authorities have three laws, but they should listen to the people with weapons.

- What is the true cause of the mutiny among territorial battalions?

- There may be a variety of factors. The main one is the failure on the front which makes people think about the fact that something is going wrong. Popular discontent is at the power, and the "national heroes" of the battalions. But the militants do not want to take responsibility for themselves. Soon the politicians will seek someone to blame for the failures at the front and the failure of economic reforms.

- What is threatened by the contradictions among the Ukrainian security services?

- They can lead to the continuation of the collapse of the Ukrainian state. You can still recall the analogy between February and October 1917. In Ukraine, it is said that the army would be better able to fight if the bodies are formed based on ethnicity. The Central Rada (Council) in negotiations with the Provisional Government argued that if everyone called from Ukraine fought under national flags and battalions with the names of national heroes, there would be progress on the front. As a result, the same army in Ukraine became a motley gang that robbed the neighbouring peasants. A century later, we see a repetition of history. From the fact that everyone began to shout "Glory to Ukraine", the military, economic and political situation has not changed for the better. But people, like a hundred years ago, continue to believe in the nationalist mythology.

- In fact, the contradictions within the Ukrainian policy are only exacerbated.

- Controversy is not going away. At one time they constrained themselves to the myth about the threat from Russia. Now this threat has become a kind of background, and Russia ceased to be consolidating enemy image. And again internal conflicts came to the surface, including between the centre and regional elites and even within the regional elites themselves.

- There is an opinion that in place of Poroshenko may come even more radical forces.

- The scenario of coming to power of a more radical leader is likely. But the possibilities for the existence of the Ukrainian state will be reduced. Poroshenko is still perceived by Russian politicians as a negotiable person. But none of Moscow will talk with any "conditional Yarosh", and it will be no worse in Moscow, but worse for the new government in Ukraine.

.............................................................................. ..

EPILOGUE FROM editorial of the newspaper “Vpyerod” (Forward)

We Bolsheviks say that the development of society, as well as all matter moves only forward: from the slave-owning system - to feudalism, from feudalism - capitalism, from capitalism - to socialism and communism. Movement of society backward in general (for example, from socialism to capitalism) is not possible, however, a temporary pullback may be possible, as happened in the Soviet Union. But along the way there will be necessarily insurmountable contradictions (we cannot even call them that), which sooner or later will explode the entire socio-economic and political situation. And then there is the classic revolutionary situation, when the "lower classes" do not want to live in the old way, and the "uppers" cannot live and rule in the old way. I.e. there is an objective revolutionary factor, but to overthrow the old moribund system needs a more subjective factor, when the masses have to be ready for revolution.
As you can see, in the system of capitalism imposed by the counterrevolution in the vast Soviet Union, Ukraine is one of the weakest links. However, for the restoration of the socialist system, as noted, we also need the subjective factor which must be prepared.
The above contradictions in the Ukrainian political system suggests that fascism in Ukraine is on its last breath, and of course, it is necessary to "help" it finally collapse. "Help" in this matter can only be done by the united masses.

Published in the newspaper "Vpyerod» №2, 2015.

For one week Poroshenko radically changed his position towards the events in Donbass.
22 January 2015. Press Service, Petr Poroshenko:

"We have also coordinated actions to bring up reserves, and if the enemy does not want to adhere to the ceasefire ... we will give it to them in the teeth."

January 30, 2015: Press Service Poroshenko:

The President urged the participants of the tripartite contact group to immediately consult with the signatories to the Minsk agreements, the practical result of which should be a decision for an immediate ceasefire and the withdrawal of heavy weapons from the battle line, fixed in the Minsk memorandum dated September 19, 2014.

Our view (editorial of the AUCPB website). Poroshenko is frightened by the army offensives from Donetsk and Luhansk on the positions of ATO troops and remembered the Minsk agreement that previously saved the Ukrainian army from a complete rout, and helped conduct the redeployment of its armed forces, get new weapons from the United States and hit Novorossiya (New Russia) destroying its civilian population. With its decision, the leadership of Novorossiya needs to recall Krylov's fable "The Wolf in the Kennels" (“Volk na psarne”). and act accordingly.

==================================

NO TO GENOCIDE OF THE PEOPLE OF NOVOROSSIYA (New Russia)
Document by the CC AUCPB

STATEMENT BY THE CC AUCPB

In recent days, the situation in the South-East of Ukraine flared up again. Daily bombings of Donetsk by the Kiev junta troops do not cease to horrify: in the bloodshed, the number of dead and wounded is increasing. Unfortunately, it is the civilian population as ordinary people become the main victims of armed attacks. The death of innocent people on January 22 at a trolleybus stop in Donetsk caused a shock in the world. Now even the Western media cannot gloss over the crimes of the armed forces of the Kiev regime which is backed the US and the EU. Even from a published report of OSCE observers about shelling of the bus stop in Donetsk, it drew the following conclusion: the killing of innocent citizens DPR is the work of the Ukrainian military.
As you know, in August last year as a result of decisive actions of the armed forces of New Russia (DPR and LPR), the Ukrainian army was on the verge of defeat, and only the start of negotiations in Minsk actually saved it from final collapse.
On the question of war and peace we Bolsheviks proceed from the position that V.I. Lenin held: "We know, we know all too well the untold disaster that war brings to the workers and peasants. We must therefore treat this subject in a most careful and prudent way. We are going to make the greatest concessions and sacrifices, to preserve peace ... We are going to make the greatest concessions and sacrifices, but not any concessions, and not endlessly ... "(VI Lenin, works. v . 44, p. 297) (emphasis on the phrase at the end of citations made by us). Therefore, in order to give workers a break from the Donbass months of hostilities, the AUCPB generally supported the idea of holding talks in Minsk, noting OUR doubts and questioning the seriousness of the Kiev junta to establish peace in the region.
And indeed, the Ukrainian armed forces violated the Minsk Agreement from the first day of its entry into force, which is constantly reported by many media outlets. Moreover, abetted by Washington, the fascist leadership now in Ukraine, having taken advantage of the respite, regrouped their forces to create superiority in manpower and technology over the armies of New Russia (DPR and LPR) and to try again put rebellious Donbass to its knees.
Confident in their impunity, the insolent Kiev leaders actually trampled on the Minsk Agreement. On January 18, the Ukrainian army again began a large-scale offensive against militias along the whole line of contact. This offensive against the militia leadership by the Armed Forces of Ukraine is being led, regardless of losses, by throwing forced into battle just called up untrained soldiers. In this case, the Kiev punishers subjected the cities of Novorossiya to a massive armed attack, on such a scale never seen before throughout the civil war in the Donbass region.
The mass killings of civilians, the destruction of huge civilian structures in Donetsk, Gorlovka and other cities due to severe shelling and bombing by the Ukrainian military, qualifies as a war crime, and was the last straw for the leaders of the DPR and LPR, the militias and all residents of Donbass, and the armies of New Russia. The grief with the burning desire to liberate native Donbas from the neo-banderov occupiers, meant that at the start of 20th January, the army of Novorossiya launched a counteroffensive: they completely liberated Donetsk airport and the village of Peski- a suburb of Donetsk, from which the Ukrainian security forces fired from for many months at most of the centre of the DPR. The armies of the DPR and LPR in their counter attacks, aim at closing the "pot" around Debaltsevo with 9 thousand Ukrainian troops inside, and in the Lugansk direction, the enemy has been squeezed in the vicinity of settlements Schastye, Luganskskaya Station, and a newly launched offensive into Mariupol, which last summer was stopped due to negotiations that started in Minsk.
In this situation, the Kiev regime carried out a heinous crime: in the morning on January 24, according to the Ministry of Defence of the DPR, Ukrainian security forces began shelling residential areas of Mariupol, which killed 16 civilians, and another 83 were injured of varying severity.
In connection with the death of the residents of Mariupol, Ukraine on January 25 declared a day of mourning.
Kiev blatantly accused militias of the DPR in the death of the Mariupol residents. Goebbels might even have envied the blasphemous lies by the modern fascist neo-banderovs. This blatant lie, accusing DPR and Russia of brutality and aggression, was picked up by the Western media and reactionary politicians. However, they absolutely ignore the massive shelling and bombing of towns and villages of Donbass over the past several months. They do not mention the statement of the leadership of the DPR there are no plans to storm Mariupol for fear of the death of its civilians.
But for the West, such electoral politics are nothing new. More recently, in the same West during the mourning over the death of 12 employees of the satirical magazine "Charly Ebdo" in a terrorist attack in Paris, a sea of crocodile tears was shed. We Bolsheviks, of course, condemn terrorism against media workers, but we believe that no one is allowed to mock the feelings of believers. Indeed, the above-mentioned French magazine with its offensive publications actually provoked Muslim extremists to commit a crime. Moreover, the policy of double standards of Western politicians and the media controlled by them causes feelings of resentment and indignation: The West arranges huge funerals-shows in connection with the deaths of several people but do not focus on the sea of blood in New Russia, flowing as a result of the aggressive actions of the armed forces of the fascist regime in Kiev.
In view of the above the CC AUCPB states the following:

1. We condemn the crimes of the Ukrainian army and volunteer military formations of the right-wing, who, like their spiritual predecessors - Nazi fighters - unleashed a war of aggression in Donbass. The result of this civil war, is the fratricidal killing of peaceful innocent people, destroyed towns and villages, blighted factories, overgrown fields, the destroyed infrastructure of the region, which already lives in a regime of a humanitarian catastrophe.

2. We demand an end to the aggression against working Donbass - once the pride of Ukrainian industry in Soviet times and stop the genocide of the people of New Russia. It is necessary to enable the population of Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics to build their future in accordance with the results of the most democratic procedure - the referendum held May 11, 2014. As you know, in the referendum, 89.07% of residents of the Donetsk People's Republic came to the polls and 90.53% of Lugansk People's Republic voted in favour of sovereignty, i.e, independence from the Ukrainian state.

3. We support the armed forces of New Russia (DPR and LPR) in fulfilling the will of the people expressed in the referendum, to liberate their territory from the occupation of Kiev up to the punitive administrative borders of the former Donetsk and Lugansk regions.

4. We believe that the Minsk Agreement, as shown by the preceding months, has not led to conflict resolution in the Donbass. The start of the January offensive by the armed forces of Ukraine means the failure of the "Minsk process". The citizens of the DPR and the LPR on their bitter experience are convinced that: the Kiev regime, led by Washington, without getting resistance, is even more impudent. Moreover, we believe that while in Kiev the neo-banderov fascist government is in power, there will be no peace in Ukraine. Thus, in order to achieve sustainable peace across Ukrainian land, it is necessary to overthrow the fascist regime, since fascists never gave up power voluntarily.

5. We note that the recently construed by the bourgeois media (especially Russian) definition of fascism as a synonym of Nazism, is incomplete and simplistic. The All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, long before the beginning of the Great Patriotic War determined Nazism in Hitler's Germany as one of the manifestations of fascism, and the genuine essence of fascism is the open terrorist dictatorship of the most reactionary groups of capital. By the way, the one and the other in the political system of modern Ukraine is present, so the Kiev regime clearly falls within the definition of "fascist".

The conclusion is that the leaders of the Western countries supported the fascist coup in Ukraine and are currently supporting the fascist regime of Kiev. However, we must not forget the lessons of history: whilst breeding fascism in Ukraine for a war against Russia, its creators will eventually get it at home in Europe, and then the unenviable fate will be bestowed upon the current European "democrats".

6. We call on the government of the Russian Federation to openly admit finally, the results of the referendums in the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics, and, as a consequence, to officially recognize their independence. This will enhance the credibility of their population towards Russia and give them confidence in the fight against the Kiev punitive regime, and change the whole political situation in the region in favour of the anti-fascist forces friendly to Russia.

7. We appeal to the working people of Ukraine: despite the incredibly difficult conditions of political terror, that it is necessary to work towards the unity of all anti-fascist forces in the anti-fascist front of Ukraine. Only in the struggle can we achieve victory over the brown plague that has now hit Ukraine, and open the way to peace, freedom, and to restore friendly relations with the peoples of the former Soviet republics, thus eliminating the bondage which the "well-wishers" from the United States and the European Union are drawing the Ukrainian people into.

Leningrad
27/01/2015
=================================

UK KFA NEWS
ASSPUK, JISGE AND UK KFA SUPPORT THE INDICTMENT OF THE KOREAN NATIONAL
PEACE COMMITTEE OF THE DPRK
http://juche007-anglo-peopleskoreafriendship.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/asspuk-jisge-and-uk-support- indictment.html
The Association for the Study of Songun Politics UK(ASSPUK), the Juche Idea Study Group of England(JISGE) and the UK Korean Friendship Association (UK KFA )today issued a joint statement in support of the indictment published by the Korean National Peace Committee of the
Democratic People's Republic of Korea(DPRK) on the 18th of February ;
Our organisations, the ASSPUK, JISGE and UK KFA, support the indictment made against the US and south Korea by the National Peace Committee of the DPRK. The US has committed the most barbaric crimes in history against the people of the DPRK by using
biological and chemical warfare and this has been connived at and defended by the south Korean puppets who fawn on their imperialist master.
The US imperialists took over the biological warfare programme of the Japanese imperialists , the notorious Unit 731 . They created a special biological warfare centre at Fort Detrick, Maryland , USA . As the indictment states " At the instructions of MacArthur, the then commander of the U.S. forces in the Far East, Shiro Ishii and other war criminals of the unit were involved in the research of germ weapons carried out by the U.S. forces.
The data of the unit were transferred to a unit of the U.S. forces known as a center for the study of biological weapons at that time and U.S. scientists worked out more than 20 kinds of study
reports based on it.
Based on the data presented by Japanese experts on germ warfare and its own researches, the U.S. carried out several experiments of germ weapons spreading cholera and Japanese encephalitis among south Koreans in 1946 and 1949.
The U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff drafted an emergency operational plan for germ warfare based on it and put the plan into practice against the Korean people during the Korean war...... The U.S.
imperialist aggression forces who had put the northern half of Korea under their temporary occupation during the June 25 war were beaten back by the Korean People's Army and took to flight when they spread in a crafty manner a number of contagious disease germs including
smallpox in many areas including Pyongyang, Yangdok County of South Phyongan Province and Kowon and Jangjin counties of South Hamgyong Province between November 29 to December 8, 1950"
The criminal actions of the US in using germ warfare were confirmed at the time by the International Scientific Commission of the World Peace Council which sent an on the spot investigation team which included the renown British scientist Professor Joseph
Needham FRS. Also at the time by confessions of captured US personnel.
Although the Yankee imperialists have persistently attempted to deny the use of germ warfare and cover up the truth , documents released in recent years reconfirm the facts. The use of biological
weapons,outlawed by international conventions, by the US constitutes a mostbarbaric crime without parallel and one that exceeds the war crimes of the nazis !
The US also used illegal chemical weapons in Korea " During the indiscriminate bombing of Nampho City on May 6, 1951, the U.S. spread toxic gas, killing 1 379 inhabitants. On July 6 and September 1 it dropped tear, asphyxiating and other toxic gases in the area of Wonsan
and several areas of South and North Hwanghae provinces, poisoning and killing many people".
Thus the US imperialists stand indicted as war criminals without equal ! We support the call of the Korean National Peace Committee for the US imperialists to be brought before an international war crimes tribunal and be finally made to account for their crimes ! We urge everyone to study and distribute the indictment of the Korean National Peace Committee. Let us expose the crimes of the US imperialists !
ASSPUK
JISGE
UK KFA

UK KFA WILL BE CAMPAIGNING STRONGLY TO EXPOSE US IMPERIALISM'S GERM
WARFARE AGAINST THE KOREAN PEOPLE AS WELL AS TORTURE BY THE CIA. WE
WILL BE ORGANSINGA UK KFA SKYPE MEETING BY THE END OF FEBRUARY ON THE SUBJECT OF US GERM WARFARE IN KOREA AND CIA TORTURE. PLEASE EMAIL uk@korea-dpr.com or juche007@gmail.com IF YOU WISH TO PARTICIPATE ,ALSO CHECK OUR FACEBOOK PAGE. WE MAY ALSO ORGANISE AN INTERNET SEMINAR. ALL UK KFA MEMBERS ARE URGED TO SUPPORT !


ASSPUK, JISGE AND UK KFA SUPPORT DPRK FM DENUNCIATION OF THE "HUMAN
RIGHTS " RACKET OF IMPERIALISM
http://juche007-anglo-peopleskoreafriendship.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/asspuk-jisge-and-uk-kfa-support-dprk-fm.html
The Association For the Study of Songun Politics UK(ASSPUK) , the Juche Idea Study Group of England(JISGE) and the UK Korean Friendship Association today issued a joint statement in support of the statement of the Foreign Ministry of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea in denouncing the "human rights" racket against the DPRK, the motherland of Juche :
Our organisations also join with the DPRK Foreign Ministry in denouncing the most unjust and reactionary "human rights " racket against the DPRK . The last episode of this boring and vainglorious soap opera was the holding of so-called "Conference on Human Rights " in the capital of the US presided over by the discredited reactionary Judge Michael Kirby(who last year sold
his house for £10 million-no shortage of money for him !) and Darusman whose hands are stained with the blood of the Indonesian people .
It is has been repeatedly exposed that the so-called "evidence " for the so-called "Commission of Inquiry " came from a small number(250 in total) so-called "defectors ". Some of these have such as
Shin Dong Hyuk have basically admitted to being liars, talking about so-called "inaccuracies" and others such as Ms Pak Eun Mi have been shown up to be frauds. It is time for this farce to be ended.
It is despicable the US, UK and EU are pouring massive funds and resources into this anti-DPRK offensive and holding all manner of conferences and junkets at the taxpayers expense when the money could be better spent on relieving poverty and homelessness !
We urge the US and its camp followers cease the anti DPRK "human rights " campaign for good and instead they should seek the improvement of relations with the DPRK. We support the resolute will of the DPRK to thwart the anti-DPRK offensive.

ASSPUK
JISGE
UK KFA
--------------------------
KFA MEETING IN LIVERPOOL MARCH 17TH

DEFEND PEOPLE'S KOREA-UK KFA PUBLIC MEETING

Hear the Truth About Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
The US threat to the DPRK -Oppose Foal Eagle and Key Resolve US chemical warfare against the Korean people during the Korean War.
Tuesday 17th of March
7pm
Quaker House 22 School Lane, Liverpool, Merseyside L1 3BT
contact uk@korea-dpr.com or juche007@gmail.com or phone our office
0207 223 4052
--------------------------------------------------------