The All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks (AUCPB), inheriting Bolshevik principles of the R.S.D.W.P. -R.S.D.W.P.(b) - A.U.C.P.(b) - of Lenin's policiy in the CPSU, is the highest form of proletarian class organisation, advanced detachment of the working class, acting in unity with the peasantry and labour intelligentsia, standing on the Party's positions for: the gain of political power - overthrowing the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie and establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat, the destruction of private ownership over the instuments and means of production, the revival of the USSR, the further strenghtening of the proletarian interests for the complete victory of socialism and gradual transition to communism. The ideological and theoretical basis of the AUCPB is formed by Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, is their doctrine in its creative application and development in modern conditions. The AUCPB is a component of the global communist movement with the aim of communism triumphing over the whole planet.

Tuesday, 27 June 2017


Strike by miners in Komi

On June 1, miners of the Intagol coal mine declared a strike on the grounds of months of wage arrears, which reached 38 million rubles. After the meeting, they refused to do the work, including descent into the underground workings.

Cash in full has not been paid to miners from January to April 2017.

At the enterprise, where the strike took place, about 1,5 thousand people work.

Seamen strike in Primorsky Krai

In early June, in the port of Nakhodka, the crew of the cargo ship "Gornozavodsk" announced a strike, refusing to work until all the painful problems were resolved.

Before the strike on the ship there were no items of basic hygiene: there was neither soap nor detergent. Detergents for the galley and buffet sailors were bought at their own expense. Work shoes, gloves were not issued at all. In addition, the salary debts amounted to more than 3 million rubles. The dry cargo ship itself was in an emergency condition - the emergency diesel generator, and other conventional equipment did not work.

Strike by public utilities in the Astrakhan region

On June 6 workers of the municipal enterprise "Kamyzyak Housing and Utilities" came out on strike. About fifty employees refused to serve sewage pumping stations.

By the situation at the beginning of June, they had not received a salary for three months. This was one of the main reasons for the strike.

Meeting of workers in Orel

On June 1, employees of the enterprise "Dormash" held another protest action in the park near the factory checkpoint, demanding repayment of debts on wages. By the beginning of June they amounted to more than 70 million rubles.

More than a hundred workers took part in the rally.

Picket in Chelyabinsk

On June 7, more than 150 employees of a local trucking enterprise went to protest with a demand to pay off their salary debts.

In total, drivers and conductors lost about 27 million rubles - this is wages for March and April, as well as compensation for leave - many of them have not had leave for two years. People are tired of lack of money and empty promises.

- I was under psychological pressure. They called from the police and the prosecutor's office, they said that we should not go to the picket, "Salimzyanova said.

Support for the picketing came and passengers - mostly retired. Many of them are outraged by the fact that the company instead of large buses they launched small minbuses of the Pavlovsk Automobile Plant ("PAZiki") type on the routes, which accommodate a much smaller number of passengers.

Thursday, 22 June 2017



Any strategy directed toward changing Cuba's constitutional order is condemned to failure

Revolutionary Government statement released June 16, in response to new Presidential Directive on U.S. policy toward Cuba, denounces Donald Trump's intention to halt progress in normalization of relations
Author: Granma | internet@granma.cu
June 16, 2017, the President of the United States, Donald Trump, in a speech replete with hostile rhetoric which recalled the era of open confrontation with our country, announced in a Miami theater his administration's policy toward Cuba which reverses advances made these last two years, after December 17, 2014, when Presidents Raúl Castro Ruz and Barack Obama made public the decision to reestablish diplomatic relations and initiate a process toward normalization of bilateral ties.
In what constitutes a setback in relations between the two countries, Trump delivered a speech and during the same event signed a policy directive entitled, " National Security Presidential Memorandum on Strengthening U.S. Policy toward Cuba," mandating the elimination of educational "people-to-people" exchanges undertaken by individuals, and greater control of U.S. travelers to Cuba, as well as the prohibition of economic, commercial, or financial transactions on the part of U.S. companies with Cuban enterprises linked to the Revolutionary Armed Forces, intelligence or security services - all of this with the intentional objective of denying us income. The U.S. President justified this policy with alleged concerns about the human rights situation in Cuba and the need to rigorously enforce blockade laws, conditioning its lifting, as well as any improvement in bilateral relations, on our country making changes elemental to our constitutional order.
Trump likewise vacated the Presidential Policy Directive, "Normalization of relations between the United States and Cuba," issued by President Obama on October 14, 2016, which, although it did not attempt to hide the interventionist character of U.S. policy or the objective of advancing its interest in changes in our country's economic, political and social order, the directive recognized Cuba's independence, sovereignty, and self-determination, and the Cuban government as a legitimate, equal interlocutor, as well as the benefits that both countries and people could gain in a relationship of civilized coexistence, within the context of the great differences which exist between our two governments. It also recognized that the blockade was an obsolete policy that should be eliminated.
Once again, the U.S. government resorts to the coercive methods of the past, adopting measures to tighten the blockade, in effect since February of 1962, which not only causes harm and depravation to the Cuban people and constitutes an undeniable obstacle to our economy's development, but also impacts the sovereignty and interests of other countries, generating international condemnation.
The measures announced create additional obstacles to already restricted opportunities available to U.S. businesses to trade with and invest in Cuba.
At the same time, they further restrict the rights of U.S. citizens to visit our country, already limited given the obligation to employ discriminatory licenses, at a time when the U.S. Congress - as a reflection of the opinion of broad sectors of this society - demands not only an end to the travel ban, but also that restrictions on commerce with Cuba be eliminated.
President Trump's announcements contradict the majority support of the U.S. public, including the Cuban émigré community in that country, for the lifting of the blockade and normal relations between Cuba and the United States.
For his part, the U.S. President, once again poorly advised, makes decisions that favor political interests of an extremist minority of Cuban origin in the state of Florida, which for small-minded reasons do not desist in their pretensions to punish Cuba and its people, for exercising the legitimate, sovereign right to be free and take control of their own destiny.
At a later time, we will more thoroughly analyze the scope and implications of this announcement.
The government of Cuba denounces the new measures to tighten the blockade, which are destined to failure, as has been repeatedly demonstrated in the past, and which will not achieve their purpose of weakening the Revolution, or breaking the Cuban people, whose resistance to aggression of any kind or origin has been proven over almost six decades.
The government of Cuba rejects the manipulation of the issue of human rights for political purposes, and double standards in addressing it. The Cuban people enjoy fundamental rights and freedoms, and have achieved accomplishments of which they are proud, and which are only a dream for many of the world's countries, including the United States itself, such as the right to health, education, social security, equal pay for equal work, the rights of children, the right to food, peace and development. With its modest resources, Cuba has contributed, as well, to the expansion of human rights in many places around the world, despite the limitations imposed given its condition as a blockaded country.
The United States is in no position to teach us a lesson. We have serious concerns about respect for and protection of human rights in this country, where there have been numerous cases of police murder, brutality, and abuse, in particular against the African-American population; the right to life is violated as a result of deaths caused by firearms; child labor is exploited; and serious manifestations of racial discrimination exist; threats are being made to impose more restrictions on health care services, which would leave 23 million persons without coverage; women do not receive equal pay for equal work; emigrants and refugees are marginalized, in particular those from Islamic countries; the building of walls that belittle neighbors is proposed; and international commitments to protect the environment and confront climate change are abandoned.
Likewise, also of concern are violations of human rights committed by the United States in other countries, such as the arbitrary detentions of dozens of prisoners in territory illegally occupied by the Guantánamo Naval Base in Cuba, where torture has taken place; the extrajudicial executions and deaths of civilians caused by bombs and the use of drones; and wars unleashed against different countries like Iraq, justified with lies about the possession of weapons of mass destruction, with disastrous consequences for the security and stability of the Middle East region.
We recall that Cuba is a state party to 44 human rights international covenants, while the United States is so to only 18. Thus we have much to show, to say, and defend.
Upon confirming the decision to reestablish diplomatic relations, Cuba and the United States affirmed the intention to develop respectful, cooperative ties between the two people and governments, based on the principles and purposes enshrined in the United Nations Charter.
In the declaration issued July 1, 2015, the revolutionary government of Cuba reaffirmed, "These relations must be founded on absolute respect for our independence and sovereignty; the inalienable right of every state to choose its own political, economic, social, and cultural system, without interference of any kind; and on equality and reciprocity, which constitute irrevocable principles of international law,” as stated in the Proclamation of Latin America and the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace, signed by heads of state and government of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), during its 2nd Summit, in Havana. Cuba has not renounced these principles, and never will.
The government of Cuba reiterates its willingness to continue the respectful dialogue and cooperation in areas of mutual interest, as well as the negotiation of pending bilateral issues with the government of the United States. Over the last two years, it has been demonstrated that, as President of the Councils of State and Ministers, Army General Raúl Castro Ruz, has repeatedly stated, the two countries can cooperate and coexist in a civilized manner, respecting differences and promoting all that benefits both nations and peoples, but it cannot be expected that, in order to do so, Cuba will make concessions which compromise our independence or sovereignty, nor accept conditions of any type.
Any strategy directed toward changing the political, economic and social system in Cuba, be it one that seeks to do so through pressure and dictates, or with the use of more subtle methods, is condemned to failure.
The changes which may be needed in Cuba, like those made since 1959 and those we are undertaking now as part of the updating of our socio-economic model, will continue to be decided independently by the Cuban people.
As we have since the triumph of the Revolution, January 1, 1959, we will assume any risk, and continue firm and sure in the construction of a sovereign, independent, socialist, democratic, prosperous and sustainable nation.
Havana, June 16, 2017.

Tuesday, 20 June 2017

UK KFA Refutes slanderous attack by Daily Star

On the 18th of June  the "Daily Star " online carried an article " Like bombing the Queen' Kim's man in UK says prisoner in coma DESERVED gulag". In a textbook example of inaccurate , distorted and biased reporting the Daily Star failed to tell its readers that the interview with UK KFA Chairman Dr Dermot Hudson actually took place on the 4th of March 2017 ( nearly 4 months )and not recently as Michael Havis tries to mislead his readers. At the time the medical condition of US national Otto Frederick Warmbier was unknown to Dr Hudson and indeed most people except DPRK medical staff.
  Also at no point during the 15 minute interview that Havis conducted with Dr Hudson ,did Dr Hudson use the words " Deserved the Gulag " .This is an invention by Havis . For one there is no such thing as a Gulag in the DPRK , Gulags were prison camps in the former Soviet Union . The word Gulag is unknown in the DPRK and the word means nothing in Korean.
  In the interview given to Havis , Dr Hudson actually pointed that Warmbier's case was complicated by the hostile relations between the DPRK and the US.
  What really happened was that  Havis(the Daily Star journalist) was found hiding in bushes secretly photographing the picket , when challenged he identified himself as a Daily Star journalist but failed to produce an NUJ press card . Why did Havis if he was a legitmate journalist need to hide in bushes and furtively photograph the picket.After some discussion Dr Hudson allowed Havis to interview him. Havis has also used pictures of the UK KFA picket on the 4th of March without permission .
  The "Daily Star " is a lying pro US, pro-south Korean puppet , dirty tabloid which often fills its pages with  pornography.
  Of course what the attack on UK KFA by the "Daily Star " shows  it is is UK KFA who are the ones defending the DPRK and doing the hard work  !
   As to the Warmbier case , it should be noted that Warmbier was returned to the US on a special military aircraft, not a civil plane, which made a stopover at a US military base in Japan  therefore Warmbier is more than a simple US college student or civilian . No one has said anything about the fact that the DPRK looked after him for a year at its own expense.  It should be remembered that no peace treaty has ever been concluded between the DPRK and the US ,so both countries are technically still at war and Warmbier was the citizen of an enemy state who carried out a hostile act . Those combatants not in uniform and spies do not have the protection of the Hague and Geneva conventions. If the US is so worried about its citizens getting arrested and detained in the DPRK then it should pull the troops out of south Korea ,conclude a peace treaty and end its hostile policy.


For reference



It is now 67 years since the United States and the south Korean regime, and its allies unleased the Korean War (June 25th, 1950 - July 27th, 1953). The US Imperialists provoked the a war of conquest against the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea in the hope of destroying the independence and freedom of the Korean people. Over the course of the Korean war, three million Korean people were killed and more bombs were dropped on the territory of North Korea than during the entire Second World War.
The Korean people were able to launch a successful counter-attack upon the aggressors and were able to have liberated 90 per cent of south Korea from colonial rule. Under the command of Kim IL Sung, the Korean people fought the armies of US Imperialism and its satellites in the Fatherland Liberation War. The struggle of the Korean people with the US Imperialists was a war of national liberation and a class war against the people's enemies. Regrettably, the United Kingdom played a disgraceful role in the Korean conflict as a subordinate partner of the US military-industrial complex.
At the time of the Korean war, the US committed many appalling barbarities in the form of massacring civilians, the use of biological and chemical weapons. The most notorious example being the industrialized slaughter of 35,835 people at Sinchon by the US military. Members of the Staffordshire KFA Branch actually came across the evidence of the US Imperialists' mass murder of civilians at the site of Sinchon during an April 2017 DPRK visit. It is understandable that the Korean people harbour strong feelings of hatred and resentment against US Imperialism.
On July 27th, 1953, the Korean people and the Korean Peoples Army won an historic victory over the United States in the Fatherland Liberation War, other wise known as the Korean War. By defending the DPRK, from the aggression of the US Imperialists and hirelings, the Korean people upheld their national dignity and honour. The defeat of US Imperialism in the Korean War was the first time when a small post-colonial country achieved a miraculous victory over a superpower, this victory was due to the strategic leadership of Kim IL Sung. Since the end of the Korean War, the DPRK government has constantly called for a Peace Treaty with the USA and the normalization of relations with Washington.
Instead of working for peace on the Korean peninsula, the Trump Administration is stoking up tensions with the DPRK to unpresented levels. The US have recently put punitive sanctions against the DPRK,which are in effect a declaration of war. US Imperialism is attempting to delegitimize the DPRK and further isolate it among the international community. The war hawks of the Pentagon have threatened in the last couple of months, the DPRK with a pre-emptive nuclear strike. Adding to the atmosphere of war hysteria, the US has deployed the nuclear submarine "The USS Mississippi" into the East Sea of Korea and thus posing a threat to the DPRK. Stationed in south Korea are around a thousand nuclear weapons and 40,000 troops by the US Imperialists.
The Staffordshire Branch of the UK Korean Friendship Association urges during the month of solidarity with the Korean people that all progressive and peace-loving people to stand with the Korean people in their just cause of peaceful reunification. We demand that the Labour and Peace Movements in Britain call for the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of US military forces from south Korea and for the conclusion of a Peace Treaty between the DPRK and the USA. The Friends of Korea in Staffordshire extend our militant solidarity with our Korean brothers and sisters in the fight for socialism, peace and independence guided by the DPRK Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un !!

Issued by the Staffordshire Branch of the UK Korean Friendship Association
June 19th, 2017

Thursday, 15 June 2017

Solidly behind Democratic Korea!

by New Worker correspondent

Outside the US embassy

Comrades joined other Korean solidarity activists in picketing the hub of American imperialism in London last week to oppose the deployment of the US THAAD missile defence system in south Korea, and to protest against US war threats and sanctions against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.
            The protest, called by the Korean Friendship Association (KFA) and supported by the New Communist Party, began outside the puppet south Korean embassy in Westminster and then moved on the US embassy in Grosvenor Square.
KFA Chair Dermot Hudson took the mike to denounce US imperialism saying: “Today the US occupies south Korea with over 30,000 troops stationed there and a thousand nuclear weapons. The south Korean people are forced to pay colonial tribute to the US in the form of upkeep expenses.
People’s Korea is a peace loving state that does not have a single overseas base, but the US has hundreds of overseas bases and troops that form a global empire straddling across the world.”

Posted by london communists


A smash hit in London! 



By New Worker correspondent
COMRADES and friends of Korea joined music lovers to see the Democratic Korean Youth Para Ensemble’s final performance of their tour of England with the support of the Korean Federation for the Protection of the Disabled. Their first tour wowed Londoners in 2015. They did the same last week.
The young disabled artistes of north Korea put on a splendid performance at St John’s concert hall in London’s West End last week. Much of the music was Korean folk music played on traditional Korean instruments such as the Kayagum in addition to a grand piano.
It was an incredible evening. One of the performers, a wonderful soprano, was only 14 years old; her singing was equal to that of a very experienced professional singer.
The artistic level was at such a high level. Indeed, in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) every child is taught to play at least one musical instrument.
Equally impressive was the performance of Onegha, a traditional Korean song and dance. The dancers, in colourful traditional Korean garb, were just amazing.
We were treated to a beautiful rendition of the northern Irish folk song Danny Boy as well as the classic Irish-Norwegian ballad You Raised Me Up, and the dancers performed part of the story of Beauty and the Beast.
No doors are closed to disabled people in the DPRK, unlike Britain where the disabled face discrimination and ill-treatment, or south Korea where they are regarded as pitiful and weak and some are sent to work as slaves on remote islands.
The concert concluded with a moving rendition of the time-honoured and renowned Korean folk song Arirang.
Afterwards the chair of the Korean Federation for the Protection of the Disabled, who were the co-hosts of the concert, made a short speech saying how the performance can break down barriers of politics and communication.


Wednesday, 14 June 2017

Glorious name Che!

In the June days 89 years ago, in the southern hemisphere of the earth, in the country of Argentina, a man was born, who was to become a symbol of the struggle for the freedom of peoples in the second half of the 20th century. His name was Ernesto Guevara. In the history of the world he came under the name of Che Guevara, or simply - Che.

The world bourgeoisie, paying for the armies of hired hacks, always tries to slander the great revolutionaries. After their death, it either tries to present them in the form of stupid philanthropists, who "for all good", eithe blackened, or smeared with dirt. But both of these methods feed on their profound hatred for folk heroes.

There are three categories of haters of Che Guevara. The first is the pro-American bourgeoisie. For what they hate Che - it is understandable. "To create two, three ... many Vietnams", - proclaimed the modern concept of the world revolutionary process of the commandant. Che Guevara pointed out that one partisan Vietnam takes huge resources from the US, at the main bastion of imperialism, and forces the capitalist system to stagger. And if there are many such "Vietnams" - imperialism will collapse, unable to cope with international resistance.

The imperialists and the servants who serve them see their own death in this threat of "many Vietnams", therefore they pay with hatred for the harbinger of the slogan.

The second category of Che Guevara's haters are the compromisers, who like to speculate about the "peaceful way" and sit in a parliamentary chair. Well, it's still clearer here. The image of Che Guevara - no, not the image that traders paint on cans with beer, but the one who takes possession of the hot minds of the leftist youth - makes the blood in the veins of these opportunists grow cold. The opportunists know that Che's ideas foretell their departure from warm parliamentary chairs.

The third category of Che haters, associated with the second, are bourgeois national patriots. In their minds the fact does not fit: how can this be taken care of not about replenishing the pockets of its national bourgeoisie, but about freeing all oppressed humanity. How can it be possible to think not about the fact that the burghers could sit in bars for a mug of beer, eating sausages, but that all over the world people should be equal as brothers! "Oh, he's a damned internationalist! ..", the nationalists grind through their teeth.

Tuesday, 13 June 2017


It is sometimes written that, with the adoption of the Declaration of State Sovereignty of the RSFSR on June 12, 1990, the disintegration of the USSR began. This is not entirely true. The destruction (its consciously carried out destruction, and not some spontaneous decay) began earlier. The "Declaration ..." is a step in this series, not the first and not the last, which, however, does not make it less shameful. To celebrate the anniversary of this event can either be only done by explicit and conscious enemies of the people - those for whom the nineties – "are sacred", or half-wits, do not understand what happened then.

In recent years, drawing attention to the mood among the people, a number of politicians, far from being communist, declare their regrets about the destruction of the Soviet Union. But you should pay attention to what they mean.

Here is President Vladimir Putin on September 23, 2016. At a meeting with the leaders of parties that passed on the results of the elections to the State Duma, said: "... You know how I feel about the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was not necessary to do it at all, it was possible to carry out” transformations, including democratic ones ... " (http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/52957)

Most commentators talked about his subsequent words - that at that time the Communist Party was at the head of the state. But the most significant in the above statement is not this. And it's not even that the president does not understand that the collapse was the result of those very "democratic" transformations.

From this statement it follows that under the "collapse of the Soviet Union" he means only the falling of the territories, but "transformations of a democratic nature" - that is, the rejection of state planning, the introduction of a "free market", privatization, etc. He considers these useful and necessary.

In fact, the destruction of the USSR is primarily a change in the social system, a change in ideological principles that are the lifeblood.

Then, in 1989-1991, a false alternative was imposed, even though the possibility of a real alternative was obscured.

The Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR against the Supreme Soviet of the USSR - both Councils were already anti-Soviet.

If not Gorbachev, then Yeltsin, if not Yeltsin, then Gorbachev.

But they both talked about the inevitable need to move to the market and "denationalize" the economy. Both of them "condemned the illegal Stalinist repressions".

And now they are also imposing a false alternative: to choose between the liberal Westerners and Orthodox monarchists (supposedly "patriots"). Thus, the head of the LDPR Zhirinovsky, after receiving from the hands of Russian President V.Putin the Order "For Services to the Fatherland of the II degree", suggested replacing the anthem of the Russian Federation with the anthem of the Russian Empire "God Save the Tsar" ... They seem to hate each other. But those and others, hate he Soviet past,even more. And in the economy between them, too, there is no difference - both those and others stand for private property.

In fact, the only way to revive the country is to return to the socialist principles both in the economy, and in politics, and in all other areas of the functioning of society.




On June 12, 1990 The First Congress of People's Deputies of the RSFSR proclaimed "a declaration on the state sovereignty of the RSFSR." Question - FROM WHOM? Russia was the cementing core of the USSR and the donor of all other republics of the USSR, it turns out, "independence" from itself, from the Soviet Union? The "legal" absurdity of this declaration is obvious.

The "Declaration" was proposed to the Congress by Yeltsin with the aim of opposing Russia, the center, the Soviet Union, to seize power in the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR (where he was elected exactly one year later) and untie one's hands, ensure the supremacy of the laws of the RSFSR over the laws of the USSR (which was proclaimed in the declaration), to begin the collapse of the Soviet Union and "shock therapy" to steal our public property.

Russia annually celebrates the day of June 12 as the day of Russia, "the birthday of its sovereignty and independence." "The question is from whom, if the Soviet Union was formed in its time around Russia? This was really the beginning of the collapse of the USSR," announced Margaret Thatcher at the results of the subversive work of foreign secret services in the USSR, in her report on the collapse of the USSR on 11.1991, boasting that they were not mistaken in choosing Gorbachev and Yeltsin as persons capable of providing plans for eliminating from World map the main geopolitical enemy of the capitalist West.

The "Declaration" opened the "parade of sovereignties" and, as Judas Gorbachev put it, "hammered the first nail into the coffin of the Soviet Union".

For us, the Soviet people, June 12 is not a holiday, but a day of national shame and sorrow. A Dark day in the calendar.

"The Declaration on State Sovereignty" laid the legal foundation for the collapse of the USSR, the destruction of the single national economic complex, opened the gate to the plundering of public property, in the mass consciousness of Soviet people led to the rejection of understanding the single fate of the peoples inhabiting our country, to the "war of laws" to the parade of sovereignty," " privatization" of state property, unleashing the separatist bourgeois-nationalist forces.

The main driving force behind the collapse of the USSR was the CPSU, which by that time had been completely mired in bourgeois reformism. The first congress of people's deputies of the RSFSR, which proclaimed "state sovereignty of the RSFSR," was 86% composed of members of the CPSU. The results of voting are striking: 907 voted "for", "against" - 13, "abstained" - 9. "Against" voted representatives of the "autonomies" of the RSFSR, dissatisfied with the fact that they were granted "too little" "sovereignty" within the RSFSR. The protocols of a roll call were not published. But many years later they appeared in print (the results of a roll-call vote). The crime of the destroyers of our Soviet homeland has no statute of limitations.

Monday, 12 June 2017

United International Anti-imperialist Anti-Fascist Front now established


On May 25, 2017 in Moscow, the founding conference took place on the creation of a single international anti-imperialist anti-fascist front (hereinafter - EMAAF). Representatives of a number of communist parties, anti-imperialist and anti-fascist organizations of Bulgaria, Russia, Belarus, Germany, Poland, the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics (LDPR) took part in the conference.

In connection with the intensification of the general crisis of the world system of imperialism, which is characterized by the aggravation of the economic and political situation, the emergence of a mass flow of refugees and migrants, the emergence of reactionary nationalist and fascist anti-communist forces, the unleashing of local and regional wars by imperialist countries, the world is increasingly slipping towards a disastrous III World war. In order to prevent the development of a military threat to peace and prevent the spread of fascism, the participants of the conference declared the necessity of unity of action of all anti-imperialist and anti-fascist organizations of the whole human community and decided to create a single international anti-imperialist anti-fascist front.

The conference participants adopted the Charter of the United International Anti-imperialist Anti-Fascist Front, an appeal of the constituent conference of the United International Anti-imperialist Anti-Fascist Front, and several resolutions and orders. The statute of the EMAAF provides for the procedure for the admission into the international association of new organizations that share the basic political principles of the EMAAF.

To guide the work of the Unified International Anti-imperialist Anti-Fascist Front, the Executive Committee of the EMAAF and the Political Council of the EMAAF were elected at the conference.

See vkpb.ruvkpb.ru for full Declaration by the EMAAF