The All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks (AUCPB), inheriting Bolshevik principles of the R.S.D.W.P. -R.S.D.W.P.(b) - A.U.C.P.(b) - of Lenin's policiy in the CPSU, is the highest form of proletarian class organisation, advanced detachment of the working class, acting in unity with the peasantry and labour intelligentsia, standing on the Party's positions for: the gain of political power - overthrowing the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie and establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat, the destruction of private ownership over the instuments and means of production, the revival of the USSR, the further strenghtening of the proletarian interests for the complete victory of socialism and gradual transition to communism. The ideological and theoretical basis of the AUCPB is formed by Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, is their doctrine in its creative application and development in modern conditions. The AUCPB is a component of the global communist movement with the aim of communism triumphing over the whole planet.

Monday, 1 February 2016


Workers of all countries, unite!




We congratulate Comrade Kim Jong-un on this momentous day and we wish him good health, and the Korean people under his leadership - new successes in the storm peaks in building a prosperous happy socialist state.



Russian Air strikes on extremists positions in Syria has brought significant results, which the same cannot be said in relation to the the actions of the coalition led by the US, said Syrian President Bashar Assad.
"We need to assess, based on the facts. Prior to the operation of the Russian Federation, which was launched about two months ago, the Americans in terms of what they themselves called "the American led coalition," which for over a year has led an air campaign against terrorists. As a result, the terrorists have only captured more territory and recruited more volunteers from around the world, "- he said in an interview with Chinese television. "For the first month of the Russian operation, those very same terrorist groups began a retreat - the president added. - Thousands of terrorists have fled from Syria into Turkey, and after that - into other countries. Some went to Europe, others - into Yemen, and others - into other areas. "
Assad stressed that thanks to the Russian shock "the situation has improved significantly." "Now I can say that our army is moving forward on almost all fronts," - said the Syrian president.

On January 5, 2016 took place the latest hearing at Uzhgorod city district court finally, with the verdict in the case of A.A. Maeyevsky. Prior to that, judge Ferenc A. He convened a meetings on 25, 28, 29, 30 and 31 December. The prosecutor - the charging party and the judge took a long time to reach a consensus on the extent of the defendant's guilt and punishment.
On January 5, finally the judge announced the verdict:
1. Five years in jail together on articles - 110 "for calling for a split of Ukraine", and - 161 "for inciting ethnic hatred."
2. Due to the fact that the accused A. Maeyevsky already served time in jail for over a year, and given the fact that the current law of Ukraine year, this detention equated to two years of imprisonment, the court sentences the defendant A.A. Maeyevsky to three years' probation.
3. Release AA Maeyevsky from custody in the courtroom.

The CC AUCPB very closely followed the progress of the court case of Maeyevsky. It always addressed the question of the legal profession for the defendant (from which Maeyevsky first flatly refused), payment of legal services, to provide financial and other assistance to Maeyevsky. Into the protest movement in defence of Maeyevsky were connected the international communist movement (in the UK, Germany, France, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and others), which at their meetings were in favour of the immediate release Maeyevsky from custody. Similar events were held on the territory of Russia and Belarus.
On part of the leadership of the Central Committee of the AUCPB were used various methods of struggle for the liberation of Maeyevsky including the help of foreign progressive press and Ukrainian leftist publications.
Organizations were constantly making aware and inviting to be present at the court sittings, together with the transfer of food parcels and literature which was done by activist of the left-wing movement in Uzhgorod Nadezhda Boychuk. The CC AUCPB sincerely thank her and her helpers for this work. We are also grateful to Comrade P.M. Tkachev.
CC AUCPB warmly thanks the lawyers in the case of AA Maeyevsky - Comrades M.Yu Temnova, A.R. Esenova, A.M. Kovalenko who were present at the court hearings.
The CC AUCPB expresses sincere gratitude and to comrades of the Workers' Party of Ukraine (ML) – the current activities of the party have been suspended in accordance with the law of Ukraine on de-communisation, members of the Communist Party of Ukraine, the All-Ukrainian Union of Workers, comrades from various human rights organizations, journalists and press photographers local newspapers, who attended the sessions and published in the local press materials about the process in the case of AA Maeyevsky.
The issue of the release of AA Maeyevsky the AUCPB was engaged in by many members from different cities. Their actions were coordinated by the Central Committee of the AUCPB.
Working members of the Ukraine buro of the AUCPB also took an active part in the liberation of AA Maeyevsky.
Huge amounts of intense work by the Central Committee of the AUCPB, as well as mentioned or not referred to in this summary of our supporters and associates, brought its results - Maeyevsky has been released from custody.
13 January 2016.
To the First Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea
The first chairman of the DPRK National Defence Commission
Supreme Commander of the Korean People's Army
Marshal of the DPRK
Kim Jong Un

Pyongyang, DPRK
Dear Comrade Kim Jong-Un!
On behalf of the Central Committee of the AUCPB, we congratulate you and through you, the heroic Korean people on creating powerful new weapons, weapons for defence and prevention from the global formidable aggressor - US – on the experimental hydrogen bomb based on domestic scientific research and technology.
The possession of atomic and hydrogen bombs and the availability of means of delivery using existing intercontinental ballistic missiles developed and designed by Korean scientists is to cool the ardor of the American hawks to any armed venture against the DPRK. Possession of the hydrogen bomb will reduce substantially the constant tension on the Korean peninsula caused by the actions of both the United States and South Korea's rulers.
We welcome the regular scientific achievements of Korean scientists and engineers to ensure the independence of Korea, increasing the country's defence and peaceful work of the people inspired by the creation of a prosperous socialist state.
N.A. Andreeva
General Secretary of the CC AUCPB
January 6, 2016.

Pyongyang, January 6 (KCNA) -- The DPRK government issued the following statement Wednesday:
There took place a world startling event to be specially recorded in the national history spanning 5 000 years in the exciting period when all service personnel and people of the DPRK are making a giant stride, performing eye-catching miracles and exploits day by day after turning out as one in the all-out charge to bring earlier the final victory of the revolutionary cause of Juche, true to the militant appeal of the Workers' Party of Korea (WPK).
The first H-bomb test was successfully conducted in Juche Korea at 10:00 on Wednesday, Juche 105 (2016), pursuant to the strategic determination of the WPK.
Through the test conducted with indigenous wisdom, technology and efforts the DPRK fully proved that the technological specifications of the newly developed H-bomb for the purpose of test were accurate and scientifically verified the power of smaller H-bomb.
It was confirmed that the H-bomb test conducted in a safe and perfect manner had no adverse impact on the ecological environment.
The test means a higher stage of the DPRK's development of nuclear force.
By succeeding in the H-bomb test in the most perfect manner to be specially recorded in history the DPRK proudly joined the advanced ranks of nuclear weapons states possessed of even H-bomb and the Korean people came to demonstrate the spirit of the dignified nation equipped with the most powerful nuclear deterrent.
This test is a measure for self-defence the DPRK has taken to firmly protect the sovereignty of the country and the vital right of the nation from the ever-growing nuclear threat and blackmail by the U.S.-led hostile forces and to reliably safeguard the peace on the Korean Peninsula and regional security.
Since the appearance of the word hostility in the world there has been no precedent of such deep-rooted, harsh and persistent policy as the hostile policy the U.S. has pursued towards the DPRK.
The U.S. is a gang of cruel robbers which has worked hard to bring even a nuclear disaster to the DPRK, not content with having imposed the thrice-cursed and unheard-of political isolation, economic blockade and military pressure on it for the mere reason that it has differing ideology and social system and refuses to yield to the former's ambition for aggression.
The Korean Peninsula and its vicinity are turning into the world's biggest hotspot where a nuclear war may break out since they have been constantly stormed with all nuclear strike means of the U.S. imperialist aggressor troops, including nuclear carrier strike group and nuclear strategic flying corps.
While kicking up all forms of economic sanctions and conspiratorial "human rights" racket against the DPRK with mobilization of the hostile forces, the U.S. has made desperate efforts to block its building of a thriving nation and improvement of the people's living standard and "bring down its social system".
The DPRK's access to H-bomb of justice, standing against the U.S., the chieftain of aggression watching for a chance for attack on it with huge nukes of various types, is the legitimate right of a sovereign state for self-defense and a very just step no one can slander.
Genuine peace and security cannot be achieved through humiliating solicitation or compromise at the negotiating table.
The present-day grim reality clearly proves once again the immutable truth that one's destiny should be defended by one's own efforts.
Nothing is more foolish than dropping a hunting gun before herds of ferocious wolves.
The spectacular success made by the DPRK in the H-bomb test this time is a great deed of history, a historic event of the national significance as it surely guarantees the eternal future of the nation.
The DPRK is a genuine peace-loving state which has made all efforts to protect peace on the Korean Peninsula and security in the region from the U.S. vicious nuclear war scenario.
The DPRK, a responsible nuclear weapons state, will neither be the first to use nuclear weapons nor transfer relevant means and technology under any circumstances as already declared as long as the hostile forces for aggression do not encroach upon its sovereignty.
There can neither be suspended nuclear development nor nuclear dismantlement on the part of the DPRK unless the U.S. has rolled back its vicious hostile policy toward the former.
The army and people of the DPRK will steadily escalate its nuclear deterrence of justice both in quality and quantity to reliably guarantee the future of the revolutionary cause of Juche for all ages.
Juche Korea will be prosperous forever as it holds fast to the great WPK's line of simultaneously pushing forward the two fronts.



http://www.uk-songun.com/index.php email juche007@yahoo.co.uk
London 6th of January Juche 104(2015)
The Association For the Study of Songun Politics UK(ASSPUK), the Juche Idea Study Group of England(JISGE) and the UK Korean Friendship Association(UK KFA) today issued a statement in support of the successful H bomb test by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea ;
We heartily congratulate the people,party and government of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea on the successful test of the H bomb, another product of the self-reliant and Juche-based development of the DPRK. The H bomb test is another powerful blast of Songun ! It is a powerful blast against US imperialism and world imperialism.
This is the 4th nuclear test of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and the 1st H bomb test. It means that the DPRK is now on a level playing field with the US imperialists in terms of nuclear weaponry !. The DPRK has joined the elite club of nations,such as the US, UK and Russia, that possess the H bomb.

The H bomb test is a powerful declaration of militant anti-imperialism and a great manifestation of the DPRK's independence . The DPRK has defied not only obvious enemies like the US imperialists but also the big power chauvinists . The H bomb test further strengthens the DPRK's independence by boosting the DPRK's defence capablities expontentially.
Furthermore the H bomb test is a just and correct response to increasing hostility of the US imperialists , the south Korean puppets and their camp followers who have leave no stone unturned in their vicious and nasty efforts to stifle, undermine and destroy the socialist system of the DPRK . The US imperialists have stacked up sanctions against the DPRK and even gone to the unprecedented and extreme(possibly illegal) length of imposing sanctions on DPRK diplomats ! . The US imperialists , their vassals and puppets have also contuined the anti-DPRK human rights campaign and forced the UN to pass anti-DPRK resolutions. This is intolerable and the DPRK is right to make a powerful response to it.
As the statement of the DPRK government says " Genuine peace and security cannot be achieved through humiliating solicitation or compromise at the negotiating table.
The present-day grim reality clearly proves once again the immutable truth that one's destiny should be defended by one's own efforts.
Nothing is more foolish than dropping a hunting gun before herds of ferocious wolves"
This is very true indeed . A nation cannot be defended with empty hands . Force must be met with force. This is the lesson of the great Songun policy of the DPRK ,
No one should try to take issue with the DPRK over the H bomb test it is the sovereign right of the DPRK that no one should challenge. The clamour of the imperialists including the US over the test is a very hypocritical one. The US posseses a huge stockpile of nuclear weapons and has carried out over 1,000 nuclear tests so they have no place to criticise the DPRK.
We believe the H bomb test would be a powerufl inspiration to the people of the DPRK in socialist construction and their struggle against US imperialism.The H bomb test is a powerful inspiration to the world revolutionary people in their struggle against US imperialism for independence as it shows that a country can defy the US and big powers.

Created in late 1922, the Soviet Union - a multinational union of sovereign socialist republics, the Bolsheviks, led by Lenin and Stalin made a great cause unprecedented in the history of mankind. They did not have any examples that they could follow, and had to decide everything for the first time. And they demonstrated themselves fully as prominent theorists and practitioners of state building. They created a sample which formed the basis of communist construction in different countries.
The historical experience of the Bolsheviks post-revolutionary years in the creation of the Soviet Union is our most valuable asset, which will undoubtedly help us modern day Bolsheviks, in addressing the daunting challenges that closely lie ahead - to overcome the effects of the counter-revolution to restore our country - the Soviet Union, to restore the foundation of its power - respect, love, mutual assistance among all now separated Soviet people.
The Bolsheviks October 25, 1917 inherited a difficult legacy. Most recently, it seemed even the monolithic Russian Empire was torn apart by various nationalists for medium, small and tiny parts. Everywhere reigned national enmity. How did the Bolsheviks oppose this? What was their position on the national question on the issue of state-building? The basic principle of the Bolshevik program on the national question is the recognition of the sovereignty and equality of all nations. The Communist Party put forward a clear slogan of the right of peoples to self-determination up to secession. However, as Stalin said: "The question of the right of nations to free secession is not be confused with the question of a nation that must necessarily secede at any given moment. This question is the party of the proletariat must decide in each case completely independently, depending on the situation."
Worldwide – of historical significance was the published over the signatures of Lenin and Stalin "Declaration of the Rights of the Peoples of Russia", which declared, among other things "Abolish any and all national and national - religious privileges and restrictions." Next, the III Congress of Soviets in January 1918 adopted the "Declaration of Rights of Working and Exploited People" developed by Lenin and Stalin. Stalin said: "The Russian Federation is a union ... of certain historically evolved territories, each distinguished by a specific manner of life and national composition." Securing the nation - state system of the young Soviet republic was completed at the V All-Russian Congress of Soviets in July 1918, which adopted the first Constitution of the first Soviet state.
National - state building went on in the Soviet Union under difficult conditions. There was the civil war and foreign intervention. The difficulties were enormous. But the masses of the national borderlands resolutely rejected all imposed by their invaders - "the self-determinators" of the bourgeois order. Thus, the peasants of the village of Vrantsi, Chernigov province at its meeting on July 6, 1918 adopted a resolution "Have discussed: the accession to the Russian Republic or Ukraine ... have decided: to fully join the proletariat both the Ukrainian and Russian and to Soviet power, but we do not want to be under the rule of the bourgeoisie Skoropadskiy."
Rapidly increased the consolidation of the newborn Soviet republics. In May 1919, Lenin and Stalin was drawn up the "Draft Directive of the Central Committee on military unity." Following this, on the initiative of the Council of Defence of Lithuania and Belarus in June 1919, a close defensive military alliance of the Soviet republics was formed.
The main and decisive condition for the growth of the unification movement of the peoples was the Leninist - Stalinist national policy of protection of the sovereignty, equality of rights and interests of all peoples.
With the end of civil war, with the transition to a new economic policy came to life a variety of anti-Soviet tendencies in the national question, especially great-power chauvinism and local nationalism. In his report at the X Congress, Stalin showed the danger and harmfulness of both deviations, stressing that the greatest danger at that stage was great-power chauvinism. The congress called for a merciless struggle against both deviations in the national question. At the same time the decisions of the Congress was clearly tasked with the creation of a state Union of Soviet Republics.
A difficult ideological and organizational struggle had to be endured by the Bolsheviks on the question of the formation of the Transcaucasian Federation. Along this way, it was necessary to overcome the fierce resistance of the Caucasian National deviators – and in the first place - Georgia, headed by Mdivani. These people sought by customs barriers to separate the Caucasus and hindered the unification of the armed forces. They issued a decree "On the cordon" forbidding actually living in Georgia those who were not Georgians! All this was accompanied by fierce nationalist propaganda about the "robbery" of the republic by its neighbours. Such were the familiar "propaganda tricks"!
In a year and a half after the X Congress, all the preparatory work in the formation of the Union of the Soviet state had been completed. The most extensive and massive movement for the formation of the USSR was acquired in October 1922. In mid-October, at the III session of the Central Election Commission of Ukraine, the third convocation was issued ruling on a request of deputies of three Ukrainian provinces - Kiev, Kharkov and Donetsk in which he said: "We exist as an independent republic on contractual relations with the Russian Soviet republic; however, these contractual relationships are not fully and clearly enough described and recorded on all issues." In conclusion, the deputies proposed to achieve such a relationship between the Soviet republics, "which should be reduced to the actual unification of all our forces in all directions against the common enemy."
So, overcoming enormous difficulties, the Bolshevik Party confidently and resolutely led the country, and the people who inhabit it, to full consolidation, and completed the signing on December 30, 1922 of the historic Union Treaty that strengthened the creation of a powerful socialist state - the USSR.
In his speech at the I Congress of Soviets of the USSR, Comrade Stalin said: "We Communists are often abused, by claiming that we are unable to build. Let the history of the Soviet government in the five years of its existence serve as proof that the Communists are able to also build. Let today's Congress of the Soviets, called on to approve the Declaration and the Treaty of Union Republics, adopted yesterday by the conference of plenipotentiaries delegations, let this Union Congress demonstrate to all those who have not lost the ability to understand that the Communists are able as well to build the new, as well as good at destroying the old ".

By S.V. Khristenko


We stand for peace and the strengthening of business relations with all countries
The foreign policy of the Soviet Union is clear and explicit.
1. We stand for peace and the strengthening of business relations with all countries. That is our position; and we shall adhere to this position as long as these countries maintain like relations with the Soviet Union, and as long as they make no attempt to trespass on the interests of our country.
2. We stand for peaceful, close and friendly relations with all the neighbouring countries which have common frontiers with the U.S.S.R. That is our position; and we shall adhere to this position as long as these countries maintain like relations with the Soviet Union, and as long as they make no attempt to trespass, directly or indirectly, on the integrity and inviolability of the frontiers of the Soviet state.
3. We stand for the support of nations which are the victims of aggression and are fighting for the independence of their country.
4. We are not afraid of the threats of aggressors, and are ready to deal two blows for every blow delivered by instigators of war who attempt to violate the Soviet borders.
Such is the foreign policy of the Soviet Union.
From the Report on the Work of the Central Committee to the Eighteenth Congress of the C.P.S.U.(B.)
(Delivered March 10, 1939.)
Let the manly images of our great ancestors inspire you in this war!
Comrades, men of the Red Army and Red Navy, commanders and political instructors, men and women guerillas, the whole world is looking to you as the force capable of destroying the plundering hordes of German invaders. The enslaved peoples of Europe who have fallen under the yoke of the German invaders look to you as their liberators. A great liberating mission has fallen to your lot. Be worthy of this mission! The war you are waging is a war of liberation, a just war. Let the manly images of our great ancestors—Alexander Nevsky, Dimitry Donskoy, Kuzma Minin, Dimitry Pozharsky, Alexander Suvorov and Mikhail Kutuzov—inspire you in this war! May the victorious banner of the great Lenin be your lodestar!
J. V. Stalin From the Speech at the Red Army Parade
on the Red Square, Moscow

November 7, 1941

The threat of war threat imperatively imposes the necessity of joint action upon the members of the coalition in order to save mankind from reverting to savagery and mediæval brutality.
It is said that the Anglo-Soviet-American coalition has every chance of winning and would certainly win, if it did not have one organic defect which is capable of weakening and disintegrating it. This defect, in the opinion of these people is that this coalition consists of heterogeneous elements with different ideologies and that this circumstance will prevent their organizing joint action against the common enemy.
I think that this assertion is incorrect.
It would be ridiculous to deny the difference in the ideologies and social systems of the countries composing the Anglo-Soviet-American coalition. But does this preclude the possibility and expediency of joint action on the part of the members of this coalition against the common enemy who holds out the threat of enslavement for them? It certainly does not preclude it. More than that, the existence of this threat imperatively imposes the necessity of joint action upon the members of the coalition in order to save mankind from reverting to savagery and mediæval brutality. Is not the programme of action of the Anglo-Soviet-American coalition a sufficient basis for the organization of the joint struggle against Hitlerite tyranny and for the achievement of victory over it? I think that it is quite sufficient.

J.V. Stalin
Taken from the Speech at Celebration Meeting
of the Moscow Soviet of Working People’s Deputies
and Moscow Party and Public Organizations

November 6, 1942
The dissolution of the Communist International is proper and timely because it facilitates the organization of the common onslaught of all freedom-loving nations against the common enemy—Hitlerism.
It facilitates the work of patriots of all countries for uniting the progressive forces of their respective countries, regardless of party or religious faith, into a single camp of national liberation—for unfolding the struggle against fascism It facilitates the work of patriots of all countries for uniting all freedom-loving peoples into a single international camp for the fight against the menace of world domination by Hitlerism, thus clearing the way for the future organization of a companionship of nations based upon their equality. I think that all these circumstances taken together will result in a further strengthening of the United Front of the Allies and other united nations in their fight for victory over Hitlerite tyranny.

J. V. Stalin from The Dissolution of the Communist International
Answer to Reuter’s Correspondent
May 28, 1943


The strength of Soviet patriotism lies on the peoples’ profound loyalty and devotion to their Soviet Motherland

The labour of Soviet people in the rear, like the immortal deeds of our soldiers at the front, are rooted in the fervent exploits and life-giving spirit of Soviet patriotism.
The strength of Soviet patriotism lies in the fact that it is based not on racial or nationalistic prejudices, but on the peoples’ profound loyalty and devotion to their Soviet Motherland, on the fraternal partnership of the working people of all the nationalities in our country. Soviet patriotism harmoniously combines the national traditions of the peoples and the common vital interests of all the working people of the Soviet Union. Far from dividing them, Soviet patriotism welds all the nations and peoples of our country into a single fraternal family. This should be regarded as the basis of the inviolable friendship of the peoples of the Soviet Union which is growing ever stronger. At the same time the peoples of the U.S.S.R. respect the rights and independence of the peoples of foreign countries and have always shown themselves willing to live in peace and friendship with neighbouring states.

J. V. Stalin from the Speech at Celebration Meeting
of the Moscow Soviet of Working People’s Deputies
and Moscow Party and Public Organizations

November 6, 1944

The task is to now make another war impossible to start
To win the war against Germany is to accomplish a great historic task. But to win the war does not in itself mean to ensure for the peoples a lasting peace and guaranteed security in the future. The task is not only to win the war but also to make new aggression and new war impossible—if not for ever, then at least for a long time to come.

J. V. Stalin from the Speech at Celebration Meeting
of the Moscow Soviet of Working People’s Deputies
and Moscow Party and Public Organizations

November 6, 1944

The Russian people is the most outstanding nation of all the nations forming the Soviet Union

COMRADES! Permit me to propose one more, last toast.
I should like to propose a toast to the health of our Soviet people, and in the first place, the Russian people. (Loud and prolonged applause and shouts of “Hurrah.”)
I drink in the first place to the health of the Russian people because it is the most outstanding nation of all the nations forming the Soviet Union.
I propose a toast to the health of the Russian people because it has won in this war universal recognition as the leading force of the Soviet Union among all the peoples of our country.
I propose a toast to the health of the Russian people not only because it is the leading people, but also because it possesses a clear mind, a staunch character, and patience.
Our Government made not a few errors, we experienced at moments a desperate situation in 1941-1942, when our Army was retreating, abandoning our own villages and towns of the Ukraine, Byelorussia, Moldavia, the Leningrad Region, the Baltic area and the Karelo-Finnish Republic, abandoning them because there was no other way out. A different people could have said to the Government: “You have failed to justify our expectations. Go away. We shall install another government which will conclude peace with Germany and assure us a quiet life.” The Russian people, however, did not take this path because it trusted the correctness of the policy of its Government, and it made sacrifices to ensure the rout of Germany. This confidence of the Russian people in the Soviet Government proved to be that decisive force which ensured the historic victory over the enemy of humanity—over fascism.
Thanks to it, to the Russian people, for this confidence!
To the health of the Russian people!

J. V. Stalin - Toast to the Russian People at a Reception in Honour of Red Army Commanders Given by the Soviet Government in the Kremlin on Thursday, May 24, 1945

May 24, 1945

The defeat of the Russian troops in 1904 during the Russo-Japanese War left bitter memories in the minds of our people

Japan commenced her aggression against our country as far back as 1904,during the Russo -Japanese War. As we know, in February 1904, when negotiations between Japan and Russia were still proceeding, Japan, taking advantage of the weakness of the tsarist government, suddenly and perfidiously, without declaring war, fell upon our country and attacked the Russian fleet in the region of Port Arthur with the object of putting a number of Russian warships out of action and thereby creating an advantageous position for her fleet. She did, indeed, put out of action three Russian first-class warships. It is characteristic that 37 years later Japan played exactly the same perfidious trick against the United States when, in 1941, she attacked the United States naval base in Pearl Harbour and put a number of American battleships out of action. As we know, in the war against Japan, Russia was defeated. Japan took advantage of the defeat of tsarist Russia to seize from Russia the southern part of Sakhalin and establish herself on the Kuril Islands, thereby putting the lock on all our country's outlets to the ocean in the East, which meant also all outlets to the ports of Sovfet Kamchatka and Soviet Chukotka. It was obvious that Japan was aiming to deprive Russia of the whole of her Far East.But this does not exhaust the list of Japan's aggressive operations against our country. In 1918, after the Soviet system was established in our country, Japan, taking advantage of the hostility then displayed towards the Land of the Soviets by Great Britain, France and the United States, and leaning upon them, again attacked our country, occupied the Far East and for four years tormented our people and looted the Soviet Far East.

Nor is this all. In 1938 Japan attacked our country again, in the region of Lake Hasan, near Vladivostok, with the object of surrounding Vladivostok; and in the following year Japan repeated her attack in another place, in the region of the Mongolian People's Republic, near Khalkin-gol, with the object of breaking into Soviet territory, severing our Siberian Railway and cutting off the Far East from Russia.

J. V. Stalin
Stalin's address to the people
September 2, 1945

Unlike the First World War, the Second World War against the Axis states from the very outset assumed the character of an anti-fascist war, a war of liberation

Thus the First World War (1914-18) was the result of the first crisis of the capitalist system of world economy, and the Second World War (1939-45) was the result of a second crisis.
That does not mean of course that the Second World War is a copy of the first. On the contrary, the Second World War differs materially from the first in character. It must be borne in mind that before attacking the Allied countries the principal fascist states—Germany, Japan, and Italy—destroyed the last vestiges of bourgeois-democratic liberties at home, established a brutal terrorist regime in their own countries, rode roughshod over the principles of sovereignty and free development of small countries, proclaimed a policy of seizure of alien territories as their own policy, and declared for all to hear that they were out for world domination and the establishment of a fascist regime throughout the world.
Moreover, by the seizure of Czechoslovakia and of the central areas of China, the Axis states showed that they were prepared to carry out their threat of enslaving all freedom-loving nations. In view of this, unlike the First World War, the Second World War against the Axis states from the very outset assumed the character of an anti-fascist war, a war of liberation, one aim of which was also the restoration of democratic liberties. The entry of the Soviet Union into the war against the Axis states could only enhance, and indeed did enhance, the anti-fascist and liberation character of the Second World War.
It was on this basis that the anti-fascist coalition of the Soviet Union, the United States of America, Great Britain, and other freedom-loving states came into being—a coalition which subsequently played a decisive part in defeating the armed forces of the Axis states.
J. V. Stalin from the Origin and Character of the Second World War
February 9, 1946

The growth of the influence of the Communists cannot be regarded as fortuitous. It is a perfectly legitimate phenomenon.
The influence of the Communists has grown because in the hard years of fascist domination in Europe, the Communists proved reliable, courageous, self-sacrificing fighters against the fascist regime, for the freedom of the peoples.
Interview with “Pravda” Correspondent On Churchill’s Speech at Fulton
March 13, 1946

The peoples of the world do not wish a repetition of the calamities of war. They fight persistently for the strengthening of peace and security
The smash-up and liquidation of the main hotbeds of fascism and world aggression resulted in deep changes in the political life of the peoples of the world, in a wide growth of the democratic movement among the peoples.
Taught by the experience of war, the popular masses realized that the destinies of states cannot be entrusted to reactionary leaders, who pursue the narrow caste and selfish anti-popular aims. It is for this reason that peoples who no longer wish to live in the old way take the destinies of their own states into their own hands, establish democratic order, and carry on an active struggle against the forces of reaction, against instigators of a new war. The peoples of the world do not wish a repetition of the calamities of war. They fight persistently for the strengthening of peace and security.

J. V. Stalin - The People Do Not Want War
Order of the Day to the Red Army
May 1, 1946

In recent times a dangerous tendency is apparently discerned in a number of literary works emanating under the pernicious influence of the west in decay and brought into life by the subversive activity of foreign intelligence.
Frequently in the pages of Soviet literary journals works are found where the Soviet people, builders of communism are shown in a pathetic and ludicrous form. The positive hero is derided and inferiority before all things foreign and cosmopolitanism, so characteristic of the political leftovers, is applauded. In the theatre repertoire Soviet plays are being pushed aside by disgraceful plays of foreign bourgeois authors.
In the films petty themes dominate and they distort the heroic history of the valiant Russian people.
While talking about the future development of Soviet art and literature it must be taken into consideration that it is developing in a condition of an unprecedented secret war, a war that has been unleashed on us and our art and literature by the world imperialist circles. The job of foreign agents in our country is to penetrate Soviet organizations dealing with culture, to capture the editorships of major newspapers and journals, to influence decisively the repertoire of theatres and movies and in the publication of fiction and poetry. To stop by any means the publication of revolutionary works which awaken patriotism and lead the Soviet people towards creating communism. They support and publish works where the failure of communism is preached. They are ecstatic in their support and propaganda of the capitalist method of production and the bourgeois life style.
At the same time foreign agents are asked to popularise in art and literature the feelings of pessimism, decadence and demoralisation
J.V. Stalin from the Discussion in the Meeting with the Creative Intellectuals

Russia, Soviet Russia – is our Motherland
The services which Moscow has rendered are not only that it thrice in the course of the history of our country liberated her from foreign oppression - from the Mongolian yoke, from Polish-Lithuanian invasion and from French incursion. The service Moscow rendered is primarily that it became the basis for uniting disunited Russia into a single state, with a single government and a single leadership. No country in the world can count on preserving its independence, on real economic and cultural growth, if it has not succeeded in liberating itself from feudal disunity and strife among princes. Only a country which is united in a single, centralized state can count on the possibility of real cultural and economic growth, on the possibility of firmly establishing its independence. The historic service which Moscow rendered is that it has been and remains the basis and the initiator in the creation of a centralized state in Russia.
But this is not the only service that Moscow has rendered our country. After Moscow, by the will of our great Lenin, was again proclaimed the capial of our country, it became the banner bearer of the new, Soviet epoch.

J. V. Stalin from Greetings Message to Moscow
8 September, 1947

A broad campaign for the holding of peace, as a way of exposing the criminal machinations of the arsonists of war, is of prime importance.
Question. Do you hold a new world war to be unavoidable?

Answer. No. At least, one can, at present, hold it to be not unavoidable.
Of course, in the United States of America, in England and also in France, there are aggressive powers that long for a new war. .They need war to achieve super-profits and to plunder other countries. These are the billionaires and millionaires that regard war as a fountain of revenue, that brings colossal profits.
They, the aggressive powers, hold the reactionary governments in their hands and guide them. But at the same time they are afraid of their people who do not want a new war and are for the keeping of peace. Therefore they take the trouble of using the reactionary governments to ensnare their people with lies, to deceive them, to represent a new war as a war of defence, and the peaceful politics of peace-loving countries as aggressive. They take the trouble to deceive the people, to force them and draw them into a new war with their aggressive plans.
They therefore even fear the campaign for the defence of peace, they fear that this campaign would expose the aggressive intentions of the reactionary governments.
They therefore even oppose the proposals of the Soviet Union on the conclusion of a peace treaty, on the limitation of armaments and on the forbidding of atomic weapons; they fear that the acceptance of these proposals would frustrate the aggressive measures of the reactionary governments and render the arms race unnecessary.
Where will all this struggle between the aggressive and the peace-loving powers end?
Peace will be kept and strengthened if the people take the holding of peace into their own hands and defend it to the utmost. War could be unavoidable if the arsonists of war succeed in trapping the masses with their lies, in deceiving them and in drawing them into a new war.
Now, therefore, a broad campaign for the holding of peace, as a way of exposing the criminal machinations of the arsonists of war, is of prime importance.
As far as the Soviet Union is concerned, it will continue to carry through the politics of preventing war and keeping peace.
J. V. Stalin - from the Interview with a "Pravda" Correspondent
17 February, 1951

To eliminate the inevitability of war, it is necessary to abolish imperialism.

It is said that Lenin's thesis that imperialism inevitably generates war must now be regarded as obsolete, since powerful popular forces have come forward today in defence of peace and against another world war. That is not true.
The object of the present-day peace movement is to rouse the masses of the people to fight for the preservation of peace and for the prevention of another world war. Consequently, the aim of this movement is not to overthrow capitalism and establish socialism - it confines itself to the democratic aim of preserving peace. In this respect, the present-day peace movement differs from the movement of the time of the First World War for the conversion of the imperialist war into civil war, since the latter movement went farther and pursued socialist aims.
It is possible that in a definite conjuncture of circumstances the fight for peace will develop here or there into a fight for socialism. But then it will no longer be the present-day peace movement; it will be a movement for the overthrow of capitalism.

What is most likely is that the present-day peace movement, as a movement for the preservation of peace, will, if it succeeds, result in preventing a particular war, in its temporary postponement, in the temporary preservation of a particular peace, in the resignation of a bellicose government and its supersession by another that is prepared temporarily to keep the peace. That, of course, will be good. Even very good. But, all the same, it will not be enough to eliminate the inevitability of wars between capitalist countries generally. It will not be enough, because, for all the successes of the peace movement, imperialism will remain, continue in force - and, consequently, the inevitability of wars will also continue in force.
To eliminate the inevitability of war, it is necessary to abolish imperialism.

Joseph Stalin
Economic Problems of the USSR - 1951
From ch 6. Inevitability of Wars Between Capitalist Countries

Communists must be patriots of their Motherland, become the leading force of the nation, and carry the banner of national independance

Earlier, the bourgeoisie, as the heads of nations, were for the rights and independence of nations and put that "above all." Now there is no trace left of this "national principle." Now the bourgeoisie sell the rights and independence of their nations for dollars. The banner of national independence and national sovereignty has been thrown overboard. Without doubt, you, the representatives of the communist and democratic parties must raise this banner and carry it forward if you want to be patriots of your countries, if you want to be the leading powers of the nations. There is nobody else to raise it.
J. V. Stalin from the Speech of the 19th Party Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union
14 October, 1952

Friday, 1 January 2016


Workers of all countries, unite!




Another court hearing on the case of A.A. Maeyevsky was held on 03/12/2015. The accused in the case was brought to the courtroom at 14.30, although the hearing was scheduled earlier at 10.30 am (moved without notifying anyone about the transfer of time of the hearing).
The courtroom was attended by judge Ferenc, Attorney Ivanina, lawyers Yesenov, Kovalenko, witnesses – Pilnik, Markov, Tkachev, Kozlov, N. Boychuk, M. Boychuk, and Bulgakov. After the announcement of the hearing, the lawyer Yesenov asks to question the witnesses - 7 people. The prosecutor protested this because the witnesses were at the previous court sessions. Defendant Maeyevsky stated that 4 of the witnesses he sees only for the first time, and the rest did not attend the meetings at which the case was addressed in substance. The judge accepts the prosecutor request.
The court proceeds to the examination of the accused Maeyevsky.
Prosecutor asks: Mr Maeyevsky, you are accused of inciting the split of Ukraine, inciting ethnic hatred, calls to overthrow the legitimate government.
Maeyevsky: I do not consider myself guilty on any one count. In the newspaper Workers Peasants Truth №6 2014, I published an article in which I criticize and accuse the current government. Yes, this power is Banderite, fascist.
Prosecutor: You call the people of Ukraine Banderites?
Maeyevsky: No, not the people, they are not the power. Look at the Program of Tyagnibok of the Freedom Party, the party of the "Right Sector" of Yarosh and compare it to "Mein Kampf" by Adolf Hitler. One to one and the same. Fascist ideology, the main enemy is Russia and communism, Russophobia. Under Hitler, communists were in prisons and camps, their leaders were killed. And what do we have in the new government that came to power in February 2014? the Journalists have been killed and communists imprisoned. In Odessa, in 2014, were burned alive or killed more than 300 people.
I am against accusations of calls to the split of Ukraine. Please attach to the case an article in newspaper №3 for 2014, in which says that we communists are against the split of Ukraine. (This article is on file at the insistence of the witness from Vinnitsa A.N. Bilanik to the protocol of the search. By the way, only in Ukraine in fourteen regional centres were printing houses, apartments, offices raided.)
I am a communist, I am opposed to the split of Ukraine. Indeed V.I. Lenin created the Republic of Ukraine in 1917. Before that there was no such state. JV. Stalin in 1945 expanded the Western Ukraine due to the former Polish and Romanian territories –and these are 5 regions. In 1944 Ukraine was joined to Transcarpathia. Ukraine was among the ten leading countries. The population in 1991 was 52 million. And now? In fact, 35 million people, but 7 million are "guest workers" (working abroad), who work around the world. And the war in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions? People want federalization, not separating from Ukraine as in the referendum was not raised the question of secession.
Lawyer Yesenov: I ask the court to invite linguist do carry out expertise on newspaper WPT№6, because she is a Ukrainian philologist and raided Maeyevsky’s article in this newspaper is in Russian.
Prosecutor: Objection.
Judge: Objection accepted.
Maeyevsky: The examination indicated that the article could lead to the split of Ukraine and a change of power. Is there proof of assumption of guilt? On the contrary, assumption as absence of evidence should relieve the defendant from prosecution.
Prosecutor: Please attach to the case records of all searches, health certificates, statements that are not registered in the narcological, psychiatric, records of questions to neighbours, etc.
Judge: Questioning is now over. The Court will now begin the debate.
Prosecutor: I beg to move the debate over to the next trial.
Judge: Why? Are you not ready?
Prosecutor: Yes, the prosecution is not ready.
Judge: The court session is over ended. Date of the next hearing will be determined later.
5 December 2015
Freelance correspondent
For the past quarter of a century, our country exists as a capitalist state. As a result of the counter-revolutionary coup of 1991, the main achievements of socialism have been destroyed, built by the painful labour of millions of workers and peasants, defended in the Great Patriotic War by the unprecedented heroism of the Soviet people. The heinous economic crime – privatization was committed, i.e. theft from the people of its legitimate domain. Where did all the wealth go to? Yes, simply they were concentrated in the hands of a bunch of thieves, who are now usually sedately called "oligarchs."
Along with the economic looting, powerful ideological pressure was conducted on the minds of people by advertising the "charms of the free market", human values, human rights, shameless slander against our Soviet country and the entire history of the Soviet Union. With great diligence mud was smeared on all "Soviet" figures, whether it be Pavlik Morozov or Zoe Kosmodemyanskaya, or even Lenin and Stalin.
The collapse of Soviet power was the result of the simultaneous action of a number of factors: the powerful ideological attacks of world imperialism and betrayal of the entire leadership of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union the cause for which she existed - the construction of a communist society, and the fact that millions of ordinary people fell for bourgeois propaganda about a "happy capitalist future" (just wait for 500 days - the program of Shatalin - Yavlinsky), the lies about two "Volga" cars for each share voucher (Chubais), etc.
After some time, the ideological fog cleared, illusions slowly disappeared and before the "audience" of this historical drama appeared whole terrible truth about the reign of capitalism, Soviet industry has almost been completely destroyed, and the second of its power in the world economy has been reduced to the sale of oil and gas to the wealthy Western bourgeoisie, millions of hectares of agricultural land are not cultivated, overgrown with weeds (many of them have already been sold to Western owners), food security has been lost, the crisis in everything - education, medicine, science. Any kind dissident of the Novodvorskaya type were finally able to say frankly: "I am personally fed up with human rights. At one time we along with the CIA, and the United States used this idea as a battering ram to destroy the communist regime and bring about the collapse of the USSR. This idea has served its purpose, and now we need to stop lying about human rights and about human rights defenders. And how about we not cut the branch on which we all sit ... ".
The current sad state of former Soviet society can be characterised in the following way: "We sit. Everything is bad. And ahead – nothing any good. Yes, a heap. What do we do now?" The social fabric of society has changed a lot. There are significantly fewer workers and peasants (often many thousands of labour collectives at the plants have been reduced to just a few hundred, and still awaiting further redundancies). The only ones being added - is the number of merchants, various wheeler dealers, and speculators. The multi-million strong CPSU has spread like a piece of jelly – with the top made of “oligarchs", and the others lying on the bottom or written into the pseudo CPRF – the direct heir to the criminal CPSU. Those who are worried about their future, and who are interested in the revival of the country and people, are looking painfully as to where the exit is? The "Democrats," deceived us, "the CPSU has also deceived us."
On November 8, 1991 in Leningrad was established All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, the party that clearly and openly said - yes, we are the Bolsheviks, yes, we are the direct heirs of Lenin and Stalin and Dzerzhinsky. We firmly believe that the course, which Stalin adhered to was correct, the only correct course in the historical conditions. That course was a course of nation-building, movement towards the ultimate goal - communism. Stalin's Soviet Union brought out love and admiration from working people in all countries, with it their hopes to escape finally from wild bourgeois bondage. About Bolsheviks of the 1920-30s were composed verses:
Nails would be made out of these people:
No harder nails made in the world.

(Tikhonov, 1922).

Over the past 24 years, the AUCPB has been able to overcome a number of hurdles that have threatened its unity and cohesion. The reasons for that were different, but they could not cause significant damage to the party. But now there is a new danger, which bears the character of inner-party connected with a leftist slant, on the attitude of our Bolshevik party, towards the ruling bourgeois regime, to its domestic and foreign policy actions in character, which calls into question the fundamental slogan of the 4th Congress of the AUCPB (2005): "To work towards revolution!"
In assessments of representatives of the leftist slant prevails an unwillingness (and these are communists, proud of their dialectical thinking!) to cover a whole matter under consideration in all its aspects, to give sober and objective assessment of the situation (whether it’s the situation in Ukraine, or the problem of the Islamic State – ISIS in the Middle East, or something else). So, for example in relation to Putin, they only have only one thing to say – Down with Putin! That's right – Down with a bourgeois politician conducting a disastrous economic policy that serves the interests of Western "patrons" of the bourgeois regime of the Russian Federation, conducting a series of measures that infringe upon the interests of the working people (for instance - plans to raise the retirement age). Down with Putin!
Only here the question - why do the white-ribbon liberals, i.e., - the fifth column, the agents of the United States, also cry out - Down with Putin! Strange?!. Not very. The leftists, not taking into account any of its forces and capabilities, nor the state of society, are shouting - "Give us a proletarian revolution" in the hope that after the overthrow of Putin will be re-established Soviet power, etc. In doing so they completely fail to see that in their struggle for power is a very strong opponent – the liberals- white ribbons. The liberals are strong and dangerous not due to its influence on the masses, but by their dominant influence over the ruling political and economic elite of the Russian Federation and by the powerful financial support (or rather, its maintenance in the face of the United States).
The goal of liberals is simple – to "tighten right up" and to bring to its logical conclusion interrupted (in their view) perestroika, to finally make everything in Russia as it is in the United States. The same liberal goals serve also the economic sanctions taken against the Russian Federation, made by the United States, the EU and NATO. Would it not be more correct if these leftists revolutionaries in the conditions outlined in the above situation to direct efforts at confronting the liberals, at the destruction of the myths about the "Shining America", "gold capitalism" and other nonsense? By eliminating the explicit and implicit US influence in the political and economic life of Russia, it will be easier to start the "restoration of socialism in one single country."
Let's return to the party slogan - the requirement "To work towards revolution!" The leftists which were discussed above, understand this slogan in a very primitive way, believing that every printed material (it is hardly an exaggeration) is necessary to complete with the slogan: "Give us the proletarian revolution." After this, according to them (nowhere) steel columns will rise up and move (led by leftists) towards smashing the damned bourgeois regime. It is surprising from where people have such a primitive understanding of the revolution, its preparation, its implementation? Indeed they would have read in the Soviet era many wonderful books talking about the heroes of the underground partisans and may even remember - what skills and knowledge they possessed, why the most skilled of them committed deeds and remained at large until victory. Today, one does not need to even leave ones home to go to learn about the revolution. Before you is the Internet, where there is literally everything! Learn everything you need revolutionaries. Read and study Lenin, Stalin, be curious. That's how you will perform the party requirement: "Working for the benefit of the revolution!"
In conclusion, a few quotes of the classics:
"The whole art of governance and policy is to promptly consider and to know where to focus our attention and the main force." (VI Lenin Complete works., vT.40, p.85)

"No revolution can be made by a party, it is done only by the people." (Marx and Engels. Soch., Vol. 45, s.475)

"When the majority of the people do not want to take power into their own hands, because it is not yet understood, then the minority, no matter how revolutionary and however clever, cannot impose its will on the majority of the people." (VI Lenin Full. Coll. cit., t.32, p.50)

"The revolution can neither be made nor set up in a queue. A revolution cannot be ordered - a revolution grows. "(VI Lenin Poln.Sobr.soch., Vol. 31, s.398)

"Uprising is an art, just like war, like other forms of art. It is subject to certain rules, neglect of which leads to the death of the party, which makes them guilty of non-compliance. "(Marx and Engels. Soch., Vol.8, p.100)

"If the revolutionary party does not have a majority in advanced detachments of the revolutionary classes and in the country, there can be no question of an uprising." (VI Lenin Full. Coll. Cit., T.34, C.337)

"... Not out of every revolutionary situation arises a revolution, but only from a situation where the above-mentioned objective changes are accompanied by the subjective, namely, the ability of the revolutionary class to take revolutionary mass action strong enough to break (or dislocate) the old government, which will never, not even in a period of crisis, "fall", if it is not "dropped". (VI Lenin Poln.Sobr.soch., Vol. 26, p. 219)

"For a successful uprising what is needed is a long, skillful, and persistent worthwhile training with great sacrifices." (Lenin V.I.Poln. Sobr.soch., 40, s135)

November 2015 CC AUCPB

Kirov is one of those outstanding, remarkable people of a heroic era of onslaughts and storms, an ardent revolutionary, a true Bolshevik, a tribune of the people, a loyal ally and friend of Stalin.
On the eve of the 1905 revolution Kirov participates in the Tomsk Social-Democratic organization. He's head straight into revolutionary work.
There comes a stormy 1905. Kirov in Tomsk organizes a demonstration of workers on 18 January. It became a revolutionary baptism of fire for young Kirov.
After the defeat of the December armed uprising, reaction rears its head. In Tomsk there are mass arrests. In prison, Kirov determinedly studies Marxist-Leninist literature.
In 1908, Kirov is released from prison and travels to Vladikavkaz (called Ordzhonikidze at the time). The tireless energy Kirov knows no boundaries. He restores the Bolshevik organization, establishes a relationship with the workers, conducts propaganda work, gathers workers en-masse, and liaises with the mountain people.
In August 1914, Russia entered the imperialist war. Kirov deploys intense activity in the North Caucasus.
In the days of the February Revolution in Vladikavkaz, a Soviet of Workers 'and Soldiers' Deputies is set up, which Kirov is actively involved.
Every day at meetings and rallies, Kirov makes speeches. His simple use of language, figurative speech, with the temperament of a fighter and passionate devotion to the revolution took possession of the minds of the public. The sharpness of his tongue and ridicule infuriated the Mensheviks and SR-s.
The mountain people elect Kirov as their delegate to the II All-Russian Congress of Soviets. Kirov is not only involved in the work of the Congress, but also directly involved in the October fighting.
The counter-revolution raised its head in the North Caucasus and incites ethnic hatred. Kirov exposes the machinations of the counter-revolution, unites the mountain peoples and seeks an end to the inter-ethnic fighting. But the counter-revolution did not sleep. Almost the entire North Caucasus is dominated by hordes of White Guard. Denikin seized Tsaritsyn and moved north. The Fatherland is in danger! - That was the call by the leader of the revolution Lenin.
Lenin and the Central Committee ordered Comrade Stalin to organise the defeat of Denikin. Tsaritsyn was liberated. Under the leadership of Kirov and Ordzhonikidze, the Red Army finally realizes the defeat of Denikin and liberate the North Caucasus.
After the civil war, the difficul period of peaceful construction began. In the struggle against Trotskyism, Kirov consistently and firmly upholded Leninist positions.
At the X Congress in March 1921, Kirov was elected candidate member of the Central Committee, and at the XII Congress in April 1923 - a member of the Central Committee.
The party sends Kirov to Azerbaijan. Kirov is takes on the restoration of the oil industry realises the tasks of the Leninist-Stalinist national policy in Azerbaijan. Kirov was one of the founders of the Transcaucasian Federation, working on its formation together with Ordzhonikidze.
During 1923 - 1924. Kirov leads a fierce struggle with the anti-Party groups and especially with the Trotskyites. Kirov gives a rebuff to attempts by the Trotskyites to undermine the unity of the party, to push it away from the Leninist path.
"... To work hard to strengthen the unity of the iron unity of our Leninist Party."
In December 1925, Kirov took part in the XIV Congress of the Party, in which Stalin had raised the question of the transformation of our country from an agrarian into an industrial country, economically independent from capitalist countries.
The Zinovievites opposed the Party's policy of industrialization, against the construction of socialism in the USSR and undermined the unity of the party, diluted by squabbles and confusion. They dug in in Leningrad, trying to tear the Leningrad party organization from the party, and intrigued against the Central Committee and Stalin.
To Leningrad to defeat the Zinoviev opposition was sent the loyal party fighter - Comrade Kirov.
"The opposition needs to be apprehended in the strongest, hardest and most ruthless manner."
The vast majority of members of the Leningrad organization approved the decisions of the XIV Party Congress and condemned the new Zinoviev opposition as anti-party.
Kirov cut short on the vine the Zinovievites intention to tear form the party its young reserve - the Young Communist League. The Zinoviev leadership of the Leningrad Komsomol was defeated. Active young Bolsheviks, rallied around the Central Committee. Kirov called on young people "to study hard, patiently."
The defeat of the Zinoviev opposition showed as Kirov said that "the Party has been living and is still living a healthy life."
Sergei Kirov - a loyal ally of Stalin - becomes the head of the Bolsheviks of Leningrad.
The wonderful organizational talent of Kirov unfolds at this difficult time in breadth. Everywhere felt his guiding hand, his sharp eye. He looks at the people and quickly assesses, on whom he can rely, advises, in a friendly way corrects possible errors in the early stages of work and in everything always inspire the same confidence, of which he has himself. By his personal example he lights up with passionate word in every employee, a faith in victory.
Kirov said: "It's all about us, in the organization of our work".
In December 1927, the XV Congress of the Party adopted a directive on a determined offensive against the kulaks. Against the policy of the party was the Bukharin-Rykov group. A victory by the Right deviation in the Party would mean the restoration of capitalism.
Kirov played a huge role in the fight against rightist restorers in the party.
At the XV Congress, Kirov passionately and fervently calls on the party: "All that is trying to trip us up must be rejected, and we are with you forwards along the road only, and only towards victory!"
In Leningrad, Kirov from day-to-day directed the work of the largest factories, providing technical reconstruction of Leningrad industry and mobilizing all forces to carry out the decisions of the Party's collectivization and liquidation on its basis of the kulaks as a class, the mechanization of agriculture, led by the construction of socialism in all spheres of economic and cultural life of Leningrad. Kirov lifts and inspires the working masses of Leningrad in the great work for the implementation of Stalin's five-year plans.
By measure of the new successes in building socialism in the country, the class struggle is exacerbated.
"The enemy does not sleep. Wherever we have weakened the revolutionary class vigilance or been complacent, there the enemy lies in wait for us. Defeating the enemy is not enough, it must be finished off completely to the end."
"Bad is that communist, who cannot recognize who the class enemy is now in its new form."
"... Discipline, Leninist resistance, purity of the ranks of our party has quite exceptional value."
A political leader and statesman of the largest scale, Kirov was one of the recognized leaders of the Bolshevik Party, a close ally of Stalin. As a member of the Political Bureau and secretary of the Central Committee of the Party, Kirov took an active part in solving the major issues of the internal life and foreign policy of the Soviet Union.
The activities of Kirov as party leader and a political leader is an example of the Leninist-Stalinist style of work. He put together a broad revolutionary sweep and serious efficiency, able to delve into details of a case and lift the "stuff" of work up to principled heights ("master" the little things of "work", "in detail check all the organization of work"), and to connect them with big party and governmental tasks.
The Zinoviev, Trotskyist, Bukharin "generals", left without an army, harboured a grudge against Kirov. They moved from the anti-Party struggle against the Central Committee, in preparation of carrying out monstrous terrorist acts against the leaders of the state.
On December 1, 1934, in Smolny sounded out a villainous gunshot that ended the life of S.M. Kirov. It is no accident that the vile assassin sent the first blow at the heart of Kirov. The enemy saw that Kirov was closer to Stalin and was his successor. Kirov played a key role in the defeat of the anti-Party groups, politically, ideologically and organizationally isolated and destroyed them without hesitation, was the hottest and fiery conductor of Stalin's policy.
"It's hard to imagine - said Kirov - a giant figure of what is Stalin. In recent years, since the time when we worked without Lenin, we do not know a single turn in our work, no major initiatives, slogan, direction of our policy, in which the author was not Stalin, but someone else. The party needs to know all major work - held on the instructions, on the initiative and under the leadership of Comrade Stalin. The biggest international issues were resolved according to his instructions, and not only these big questions, but also, it would seem, tertiary and even tenth-questions interested him." "A mighty will, a huge organizational talent of this man, provided the party with timely big historical turns associated with the victorious construction of socialism."
Eternal memory to you, dear Sergey Myronovych! Your ardent image will burn forever in our hearts!

On November 25 in Yekaterinburg (Sverdlovsk), with the participation of senior management of the country, the "Boris Yeltsin Presidential Center" was opened up.
At the opening of this sinister memorial, President Putin said: "... Boris wanted to make our country strong, prosperous, happy ...".
These deceitful words of Vladimir Putin may cause a wry smile of irony. But nothing else could be expected from Putin. Since Yeltsin appointed Putin as his successor (placing Stepashin and Putin around his table and planting Putin next to himself). Therefore the first Decree of President Putin was the decree of the complete legal immunity for Yeltsin's plundering of the country and the collapse of the state for the deaths from poverty, hunger and lack of rights of millions of people. For the presidency, Yeltsin was nominated by Academician Sakharov, who said then that Yeltsin is the best battering ram for the destruction of the Soviet power. At the same time, the liberals agreed with Sakharov.
The only thing Yeltsin wanted was to become the "Tsar of Russia", at worst - "Tsar of Moscow." Under Yeltsin, foreigners filled the entire Kremlin. Tsar Boriska became the personification of stupidity and drunkenness with full power delivery to foreign (US) "advisors" and "consultants" from the CIA, paving the way for unprecedented looting of things by a foreign country.
The whole period of intense activity of the former partocrat of the CPSU President Yeltsin went down in history as a period of dramatic impoverishment of the people, the distribution of (fictitious sale for a penny) fraudsters (their own and Western) Soviet industry giants, the destruction of everything that could not be paid for a song, the destruction of the rural economy forced by "privatization", the monstrous stealing from the population through the seizure of all their savings from the savings bank, mass unemployment due to closure - the destruction of enterprises, etc. Yeltsin's presidency has made happy only underground millionaires, thieves and bandits, like a pack of jackals pounce on the plunder of public property, which no one had the right to "privatize". The looting of the national wealth and the outflow of capital abroad continues to this day. The hallmark of Russia under Yeltsin was the face of a drunken vomiting Boriska in Germany orchestrating at the German Orchestra.
On the walls of the Centre is a masterpiece of monumental architecture of Americans, we read on the plates of black marble names of those who made a contribution to the construction of the Yeltsin memorial. (The Yeltsin centre officially cost the treasury $ 7.5 billion. But in reality, how much?) Among the names of the oligarchs (looters of public property) we read the name of prime minister Medvedev - the patron of the "fifth column" in Russia ...
Photo and movie cameras captured among the reporters present at the opening ceremony of the Center Yeltsin oligarchs and those loyal to the USA. Among them, Chubais - the great reformer, recruited in the 1980 years by the CIA and rootless cosmopolitans - Posner, Benedict, Makarevich and other important persons of the fifth column, thriving on Western grants. Among them Ksenia Sobchak - the creator of the house of debauchery and tolerance on TV ("Dom-2").
With all the vain attempts of the current government and the President of Russia to this day, they cannot climb the first rung on the standard of living in Russia at the beginning of 1985 .; science, education, culture have all slipped below the horizon ...
Expositions, deployed within the Centre, those allegedly "show" life under the Soviet regime, are monstrous fiction, fraud and gross distortion of historical facts and history itself, an insult to the Soviet people. But life under capitalism –is painted with rose tinted glasses like a sort of flowering cherry garden of happiness and prosperity.
But whatever comes of guides of ecstatic words of praise of the charms of life in modern capitalist paradise created by the three presidents of the Russian Federation, the sharper people see hypocrisy and deception, the more I realize that we have lost with the destruction of socialism in some deep pit of despair pushed by Russian presidents of the capitalist "paradise". The praises of bourgeois Tsar Boriska as a result of the presentation of the Centre appeared completely empty.
And all this Sabbath of the fifth column at the opening of the Yeltsin Centre is nothing more than a "sadomasochistic nostalgic hysteria of certain social groups."
Out of place and not the time, the liberals stage this sinister spectacle of worship to Tsar Borisko.



P / S are some details about this disgraceful spectacle http://www.nakanune.ru/articles/111169/

On October 18, 2015 at the age of 89 (born on 8 April 1926), in Paris after a long illness, Comrade Jacques Lejeune, our great friend and the publisher of the magazine "News from the USSR" passed away. Comrade Jacques Lejeune was a direct descendant of the French Communards. He was a true communist Bolshevik who grieved the tragedy of the destruction of the USSR by the cosmopolitan liberals in the 1990-s. Comrade Jacques Lejeune had amazing energy, cheerfulness, laughing at himself, saying that the translation of his name means - "forever young." In the 1990-s, he worked as a translator in the journal «Editions Démocrite» with Comrade Alex Mumbarisa. In July 1999, Comrade Jacques Lejeune became the founder and publisher of the magazine "News from the USSR" (in French, with coloured illustrations), which was widely distributed in France, in Paris and beyond. In the journal were published translations of the most topical and interesting articles from our AUCPB press. On the day of the death of Comrade Jacques Lejeune, there were in total published 133 issues of the magazine. Comrade Jacques Lejeune was a friendly man, very friendly, highly cultured and extremely competent, who knew perfectly all Slavic languages and literature freely translating them into French. Comrade Jacques Lejeune worked as a teacher of the Russian language courses for adults in one of the Paris suburbs. In the fall of 1964, he participated in the International Seminar of Teachers of Russian Language at the M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, and passed the practice of teaching Russian as a foreign language, a course of lectures on Russian literature.
In his small apartment in Paris near Montmartre, he had a huge library of world literature published in various Slavic languages. In the library, a large area was occupied by dictionaries of almost all Slavic languages. We maintained with Comrade Jacques Lejeune constant contact, exchanging assessments of world events.
The memory of this wonderful Person, a wise and kind, Communist-Bolshevik, active fighter for the socialist future, for the revival of the Soviet Union will forever remain in our grateful memory.
Nina Andreeva,
General Secretary of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks (CC AUCPB)
November 2015

On December 17, 2011, DPRK leader Kim Jong-il, the General Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea, Chairman of the National Defence Commission of the DPRK, Supreme Commander of the Korean People's Army, Marshal of the DPRK, suddenly died. He was one of the prominent statesmen and political figures of the late XX - early XXI century.
The Workers' Party of Korea deeply reveres him as the eternal General Secretary of the WPK. And this is not in a symbolic sense.
The coherent theory of the Juche idea, formulated by Kim Jong Il on the basis of the theses of the Great Leader Comrade Kim Il Sung, is now the state ideology of the DPRK, the fundamental theory of building socialism with Korean characteristics.
Songun politics, proclaimed by Kim Jong Il on the night of the New Year 1996-1997 in one of the military units of the KPA, aimed at people of the need to be always ready to defend their Korean Fatherland, to the priority of the Army in all areas of construction and development of the state. Then Kim Jong Il on the basis of a comprehensive strengthening of the defence capability of the country put forward the theory of building a great prosperous powerful socialist state.
The original theory of the Songun revolution developed by Kim Jong Il, is an all-conquering banner in reliable defence of the sovereignty of the country and the nation, defending the independence of the state against the frenzied policy of "force" by the imperialists. The correctness and vitality of the great Songun political line is supported by the convincing realities in the DPRK.
Today, the DPRK demonstrates its impressive appearance as a country which has developed and launched artificial Earth satellites into space, as a country and holder of nuclear weapons.
For the WPK and the Korean people who carry out a general procession to build a great prosperous powerful socialist state, the ideological and theoretical works of Kim Jong Il serve as irrefutable truth, the eternal banner of victory.
The General Secretary of the WPK, Great Kim Jong Il will live forever with the all-conquering WPK.
The great cause of building a prosperous state after the Great Leader Comrade Kim Il Sung and Great Kim Jong Il, is successfully being continued by their grandson and son Kim Jong-Un.
We wish the heroic people of the DPRK great success in socialist construction and the implementation of their cherished dream - the reunification of their beloved homeland, divided by fault of the United States –into a unified Korea.


On behalf of UK KFA we wish all members, supporters and friends , a Happy Xmas ( or Happy Winter Solstice Day) and a Very Happy New Year.
We thank you all of you for your contuined support and hard work during the past year which has contributed to our success.

London 18th of December 2015
The UK Korean Friendship Association issued the following statement today.

We in the UK Korean Friendship Association sincerely congratulate the Korean people on the 98th anniversary of the birth of the Madame Kim Jong Suk, the Mother of Korea and the anti -Japanese war heroine and indomitable revolutionary fighter. On the anniversary of the day of her birth we recall her great exploits.
Madame Kim Jong Suk participated in the anti Japanese armed struggle becoming a distinguished woman partisan commander and crack-shot. She defended the leader of the revolution general Kim Il Sung physically as well as politically and ideology. She brought up the young leader comrade Kim Jong Il, the future Songun brilliant commander in the militant revolutionary environment of the anti Japanese armed struggle.
Comrade Kim Jong Suk was a model of self-sacrifice and devotion She took great pains to look after and care for her comrades in the anti-Japanese armed struggle and also after Korea's liberation she led a simple frugal life taking care of the people.
Comrade Kim Jong Suk strove to liberate Korean women from the double and triple oppression of imperialism and feudalism. She put into practice Juche-orientated theory of President Kim Il Sung on women's emancipation achieving great results in practice. She was the founder of the Korean Democratic Women's Union.

UK KFA respect Kim Jong Suk as the great mother of Korea,anti Japanese war heroine,indomitable revolutionary fighter for socialism and outstanding theorist of Juche orientated women's liberation who these theories into practice with great effect.

The UK Korean Friendship Association today issued the following statement on the 24th anniversary of the appointment of the great leader comrade Kim Jong Il as supreme commander of the Korean People's Army;
On the 24th of December 1991 a decision made by the political bureau of the Workers' Party of Korea appointed the great leader comrade Kim Jong Il as supreme commander of the Korean People's Army. During the years that followed his appointment as KPA Supreme Commander , great comrade Kim Jong Il commanded the KPA in the toughest confrontation with US imperialism , the sworn enemy of the Korean people. Comrade Kim Jong Il continued the tradition of independent Juche army building pioneered by the great leader President Kim Il Sung .The KPA's strength has increased greatly and it became an armed force equipped with the latest technology including a nuclear deterrent and long range missiles .
Respected supreme commander generalissimo Kim Jong Il led the Korean People's Army to victory in the war without gunshots against the US imperialists.
As KPA supreme commander comrade Kim Jong Il not only defended the independence and socialism of the DPRK but also defended world peace as the tough anti-imperialist stance of the KPA ,based on Songun politics ,combined with the nuclear deterrent prevented the outbreak of war on the Korean peninsula.
Today the work of the great leader comrade Kim Jong Il is continued skilfully by his successor dear respected Marshal Kim Jong Un the supreme commander of the Korean People's Army and great successor to the Songun revolutionary cause.


The use of the term "dynasty " in relation to the DPRK is wrong and misleading because it equates the DPRK with dynasties in capitalist countries or with feudal dynasties like the Ri dynasty in old Korea which sold the country out to the Japanese imperialists . The DPRK is also unfairly singled out over the issue . For example the BBC and a lot of media love for example to refer India as the "world largest democracy " , blissfully ignoring the fact that for decades India was ruled by members of the Nehru-Gandhi family ( some may also point out that India has a caste system , human rights violations by landlords etc, repression of some organisations etc) . The USA itself has the Bush dynasty , the Clinton dynasty and in the past the Roosevelts .
It is quite wrong to compare the DPRK to any of these . Respected Marshal KIM JONG UN is the people's choice for leader . He was elected as a vice -chairman of the Central Military Commission of the Workers' Party of Korea at the 3rd Party Conference of the Workers' Party of Korea and as First Secretary at the 4th Party conference of the WPK. The WPK is party with millions of members and members from all walks of life from hotel cleaners to leading scientists , singers and actors . Most families in the DPRK have one member who is a Party member. Moreover Marshal KIM JONG UN was elected First Chairman of the National Defence Commission of the DPRK by the Supreme Peoples Assembly(SPA)of the DPRK . The SPA was itself elected by 99.9% of the electorate , compare this to the 54.9 turnout in the last US presidential election and 66.1 turnout in the UK general election. Which country has the undemocratic and unrepresentative system, the answer is obvious looking at the statistics.
Respected Marshal KIM JONG UN is indeed the successor to the cause of Juche revolution and Songun revolution started by the great leader President
KIM IL SUNG and carried forward by Chairman KIM JONG IL . He is a people's leader who puts people first and a true patriot who values independence and does not sell the country out unlike the incompetent feudal dynasties.

Dermot Hudson


Tuesday, 1 December 2015


Workers of all countries, unite!




Dear comrades Bolsheviks, all those who together with us fighting for socialism and the revival of our great socialist country - the Soviet Union! Our like-minded supporters and associates abroad!
We congratulate you all on the 98th anniversary of the Great October Socialist Revolution!
This revolution was the turning point in the development of human civilization and ushered in the transition from a society of exploitation of man by man with a fabulous wealth of a very narrow circle of people - owners of private ownership of the means of production, the land and its mineral wealth and - the great mass of indentured servants who sell "to the owners of life" their labour, their health from the scant half-starved existence. The Great October Revolution ushered in the transition to the construction of socialism, the first stage of communism - a society of high morals and justice, which humanity has always sought.
The successful construction of socialism in the USSR proved in practice, the possibility of building socialism in one country, where people of work became a central figure in the community. Of course, opposition to socialism and world imperialism was difficult. But thanks to the genius leader of the revolution – V.I. Lenin and J.V. Stalin, the great enthusiasm of the masses who had risen to the construction of a new, free society, a once "backward" Russia became a centre of union of many peoples and nations of Eurasia into a single, powerful, highly developed socialist state - the Soviet Union, which had risen to the level of a superpower of the world, defeated German fascism, initiated the collapse of the world colonial system and led to the peaceful coexistence of two antagonistic social and political systems for more than 70 years and after the war, became the great banner of humanity in the struggle for peace and justice.
Due to violations of socialist legality in the Soviet Union after the death of J.V. Stalin, with the strong support of the West's fifth column, consisting of former members of the ruling class and their descendants, as well as degenerates in the structures of the party nomenklatura of the CPSU patronizing criminal underground business (neo-capitalism), they managed to carry out the bourgeois counter-revolution of the '90s, which stopped the movement of the Soviet people towards a bright communist future, and it destroyed the USSR, deprived us of our dear Soviet Mother. We clearly understand that this is a temporary retreat from the progressive movement of civilization. The future undoubtedly belongs to socialism!
To carry out a socialist revolution, there must be a colossal superiority of revolutionary forces. Then, in October 1917, the Bolsheviks were supported by the overwhelming majority of the people. The Bolshevik organization at the time of the Great October Socialist Revolution in Petrograd alone had in its ranks about 50 thousand people. "What a tremendous strength for the revolution - Lenin said, - Now the most important thing is to manage it in such a way to win." Then, in 1917, Soviet power was established peacefully in 79 Russian towns and cities out of 97. Victory of the revolution was the result of the overwhelming superiority of the revolutionary forces.
On November 8, 1991 at the constituent congress in Leningrad under the anti-communist and anti-Stalin hysteria of the "democrats" - "liberals" and under the ban of communist activity and the collapse of the CPSU, we formed a new party - the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks (AUCPB), defending the great principles and traditions of the legendary Stalinist CPSU (b), categorically rejecting the criminal legacy of the Khrushchev-Brezhnev CPSU. At this congress, the main task of the Party was the revival of the Soviet Union, the development of socialism and building of communism. At the IV Congress of the AUCPB on April 16, 2005, the slogan - "to work for the revolution!" was proclaimed. This means first and foremost the most extensive propaganda and agitation among the masses the ideas of Bolshevism. This Leninist slogan remains relevant to this day.
We congratulate our fellow Bolsheviks with the 24th anniversary of the AUCPB.
We wish you courage and perseverance in the struggle for the emancipation of the working man.
We wish you all good health, mental and physical strength needed to win this fight.
Long live the new upcoming Great October Revolution!


From the courtroom
On November 9 in Uzhgorod city district court another hearing on the case of the editor of the newspaper "Workers' and Peasants truth" Anatoly Arkadevich Maeyevsky was held.
Present in the courtroom were: Judge Andrei Nikolaievich Ferenc, prosecutor Alexander Ivanina, lawyer Aleksandr Romanovich Esenov, as well as readers of the newspaper. The participants held up placards: "Freedom to political prisoner – A.A. Maeyevsky"
The hearing begins. The prosecutor makes a statement on the extension of detention.
A.A. Maeyevsky in turn makes a statement on the ending of his detention under the personal responsibility. The court retires to the deliberation room to decide.
An announcement is made of it decision: In relation to the particularly serious nature of the crime, the court can not reverse the decision on the detention of Maeyevsky and extends the length of his stay in detention until the end of the judicial investigation on 8 January 2016.
The Court continued its work. Witnesses Ilyina Tatyana a postal worker was called upon, who was responsible for the signing of the agreement on the distribution of the newspaper. She informs that the agreements were signed with the presence of all necessary documents. She had not read the newspaper, thus could not to give a proper assessment of it.
Another witness was called upon, this time E.G. Fazedosh, a journalist of the newspaper "Transcarpathian Pravda", then A.A. Rozhko, dean of the Carpathian Voloshin University, lawyer N.I. Osadchuk, R.I. Moldavchuk, Associate Professor of the Carpathian Voloshin University. It was namely Moldavchuk that turned to the police special branch SBU, after having received the newspaper "RKP" from his friend, and requested that the editor of the newspaper be brought to justice. The prosecutor asked him- "Why do you think that the editor of the newspaper "RKP"is calling for the split of Ukraine?" - Moldavchuk answered - "He published an interview by Gubarev with one of the journalists and placed the portrait Gubarev in it. And most importantly, on the first page there is a portrait of Stalin!” The prosecutor then asks "A call for ethnic hatred is what exactly?" The reply: "He calls Ukrainians Banderovs and fascists!"
Maeyevsky’s reply was: I am Ukrainian, but not a Banderov and do not consider myself a fascist. I am a communist. Give me an example where I'm saying this? And where does it say I call for "the division of Ukraine?" Neither the associate professor Moldavchuk nor the above-mentioned other university staff could name them. Judge closed the hearing. The date of the next court hearing has not been determined.
Material prepared by N.I. Boychuk


On September 30, 2015 the operation by the air and space forces of Russia for the destruction of Isalmic State in Syria began.
The United States, pursuing their selfish geopolitical goals in the Middle East for more than twenty years have been kindling bloody fires in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and Yemen. Religious, political and ethnic conflicts have affected in varying degrees, all States in this volatile region.
The Russian Federation can not be detached and look at the dangerous situation in the Middle East. After all, this region is in the immediate vicinity of the Russian Federation. To the European Union, and even more so - to America, the distances are many times more. And there is also the problem with the production and sale of oil, OPEC, and the millions of Muslim population of the Russian Federation.
Therefore it is hardly surprising and is justified, that measures were taken by the Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Russian Government in September in connection with a request for military assistance to counter the terrorist group "Islamic State" (IS). Syrian President Bashar al-Assad made such a request to Moscow. Activity by Isalmic State in Russia has been banned by court decision.
The operation began after the approval by the Federation Council of the proposals by President Vladimir Putin about the use of the Armed Forces outside Russia. Russian aviation group Air-Space Forces (VKS), which is composed of more than 50 planes and helicopters, including the Su-24M, Su-25 and Su-34, launched pinpoint strikes on September 30 on targets in Syria held by IS. The Russian air group struck a few dozen objects held by the terrorists "Islamic state." On Saturday, October 3, this was reported by the chief of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff, Colonel-General Andrei Kartapolov.
These air strikes proved to be quite effective. According to the same Kartapolov, the militants of the group "Islamic State" (IS) were in panic leaving the areas under their control in Syria. "For three days we have been able to undermine the material base of the terrorists and to significantly reduce their combat capability" - said Kartapolov. He noted that the strikes from the air base Hmeymim were around the clock and "the entire depth of the territory of Syria." According to him, the objectives of the Russian air force are, first of all, "command and control centers, warehouses of ammunition and explosives, communication centers, mini-factories for the production of weapons of suicide bombers and training camps of militants."
At a meeting in Paris, Vladimir Putin told the French leader Francois Hollande, that the operation by the Russian air force in Syria is aimed at combating terrorism and to preserve the integrity of Syria. Putin's spokesman said: "The President particularly stressed that the operation in Syria, is being carried out by Russian forces in strict accordance with principles of international law ... Around the same vein, the Syrian issues were discussed with German Chancellor Angela Merkel."
It would seem that Russia's war against terrorism, for which was so heart-rendingly called for by the US and European Union politicians, would have met with their full and unconditional support. But petty politicking and penny pinching political considerations do not give these politicians any rest. Thus, Western politicians, however, are more “worried” not with the problem of Islamic State, but with the legitimate President of Syria - Bashar al-Assad staying in power. And the last fact makes significant aberrations in the position of the Western centres of power in Europe. Why is that? The answer is: we must always keep in mind what "big brother" in Washington thinks...
In vengeance, the Western media also tries attributing the Russian Air Force bombing of Islamic State to bombing of innocent civilians, or - "only the opponents of Bashar Assad." To this the Russian Defense Ministry responded by saying: "We are closely monitoring all information received, irrespective of the source of their appearance. These pseudo-sensations are complete nonsense, which has no factual basis to name or much less to discuss their details." In addition, it was stressed that the United States had notified the Defense Ministry that in the zone of Russian aviation, "there was no one except the terrorists."
Interestingly, the Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi has offered to engage in the fight against the terrorist group "Islamic State" in the country in coalition with the participation of Russia and Iran. According to the Iraqi prime minister, Russian President Vladimir Putin told him that Russia is fighting terrorists in Syria.
On October 7 four missile ships of the Caspian Fleet of the Russian Federation launched 26 cruise missiles at 11 targets of the IS in Syria. The missiles have shown to be effective at a distance of 1.5 thousand Km, all the targets were hit, without civilian casualties. Syrian troops during the offensive during the offensive advanced by 70 km per day from the city of Hama - the administrative center of the province. The ground operation, 200 km north of Damascus became possible after the effective strikes, which were launched by the Russian VKS on positions of the IS gangs. Support for the army of Bashar al-Assad air from Russian air force allows it (the army) to gradually liberate the territories occupied by IS.
The trajectory of the Russian missiles fired from the Caspian Flotilla on IS positions in Syria, has been agreed with Iraq and Iran, according to the press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation, Dmitry Peskov.
(For more information about the operation of the Caspian Flotilla, one can read the material by P. Ishchenko (abridged version).
The West is very concerned about the success of the Russian VKS operation to destroy IS militants in Syria. On 11 October, it was reported in the media about the resolution of the NATO pilots participating in the strikes on the positions of Islamists in Iraq, to open fire on Russian fighter aircraft. Such permission was given to the pilots of the British fighter-bombers "Tornado", equipped with "air-to-air" missiles. This authorization in the West was explained by saying "No one knows what the Russians will do next. We do not know how they will react if they encounter Western fighter planes in the air." To such a statement Moscow responded by saying that despite the previously expressed interest of the authorities in Baghdad to destroy the IS terrorists in Iraq, the Russian air force will not launch an offensive on the terrorists in Iraq, but is limited to the operation only in Syria. Http://lenta.ru/news/ 2015/10/11 / fire
In our support for the foreign policy of President Putin in solving the Syrian problem at this point in time, we believe it necessary to prevent the spread of the IS plague into the north and north-east towards the southern borders of the former Soviet republics and beyond - into Russia. There live our brothers and sisters, ordinary Soviet citizens of the Central Asian republics of the USSR. And to wish on any of them to be shot, or beheaded, or with eaten internal organs by prehistoric humanoid– Islamic State monsters can only be given by the Russian liberal, who betrayed in the period of "perestroika" the Fatherland, destroyed the Soviet Union, a liberal, who is now on various political shows brazenly and impunity professing immoral "Western values" (US), but expressing support for the misanthropic predatory US policies on the world stage.
Russian liberals, in particular, the party "Right Cause", Jesuiticlly support the US which plunged the Middle East into uncontrollable chaos.
When analyzing the events in the Middle East, Ukraine, Moldova and other regions bordering on Russia, and not only there, there is a need to assess the activity of President Putin, both in foreign and domestic policy in the Russian Federation. And here arises the question of universal values, of HOW MUCH AND HOW they are implemented by the president and his government.
In our time of universal nihilism, negation of morality, various speculative substitutions of sense definition of fundamental concepts - human values – did not escape these trends. But eternal truths remain truths, no matter how someone else tries to manipulate or trivialize them, sneer at them and mock them.
Human values are universal principles, developed by mankind for centuries in the history of mankind and activities since its inception. Human values (principles) historically emerged as the need for single, common rules of behavior and relationships by combining individual human conglomerates (family, tribe, birth, etc., in the future - the relationship between states). Human Values (principles), to put it simplistically is a set of concepts, laws, axioms, regulations, etc. that govern a person, human society in its activities. Universal principles are therefore called universal values, and they can not be like any value, destroyed, distorted, but are necessary to preserve, protect and follow. With the development of civilization, they are supplemented, improved, refined and expanded.
The content of universal values are not directly linked specifically to any one historical period of social development, with any one particular socio-political systems, with any one specific ethnic (national) tradition. They - are common to all mankind, and reproduced in any system, in any type of culture, for any universal humanistic direction. Human values - this is universal for any humanistic exercise of human rights, fundamental freedoms, improving the quality of life, the peaceful coexistence of states, peoples and races, international law and justice. They are reproduced in the politics of public figures in the historical process of the destruction and creation of states, the devaluation of the eternal moral values, in the way of finding ways out of the crisis.
The underlying universal value in all times of human history is life itself and the problem of its preservation and development of natural and cultural forms.
Today, the Russian Federation in carrying out a military operation to destroy the Islamic State in Syria continues the historically humane mission of Russia in the world for the protection of fundamental human values - to save the life of the citizens of the sovereign state of Syria, which, since 2011, the United States has been actively trying to destroy. Isalmic State was created by the United States and therefore "the struggle with IS" by the United States and the creation of the so-called "Coalition against IS" is a mask of hypocrisy and lies, behind which hides a complete rejection by the US in recognition of the dominance in policies and practices of common universal principles. Namely the United States in pursuit of its unlimited domination over the material riches of this region of the world, are responsible for the criminal actions of Islamic State for the destruction of peoples and the unique monuments of ancient culture in the Middle East, and thus, the United States have placed themselves outside the law. The US is an international criminal, which, together with Islamic State, should be be tried by an international tribunal as the world's major evil of the XXI century.
Modern capitalism has destroyed the stability of the existing world order. Society has lost its prospects for sustainable development. Mankind has been plunged into a systemic civilization crisis - the crisis of the world economy, which is accompanied by a global political crisis in violation of all aspects of the hitherto existing world order and of social life. The systemic civilization crisis includes ecological crisis as a result of predatory man-made human activity.
Simultaneously, as a conjugate with them, is the crisis of the human personality, a spiritual crisis with the loss by humans of all landmarks in life. The advertised by corrupt capitalist leaders and the so-called Western media "The struggle for human rights", "the sovereignty of states" are only a perverted and false advertising of "values", behind which hides open armed aggression against sovereign states, attributed by the United States and the sphere of their "vital interests."
Only socialism, its class values most fully embody universal values. Only socialism opens endless possibilities for every citizen of society to self-improvement and is the only chance to save mankind from military, environmental, demographic, information and other global crises that are now shaking human civilization.
As for the domestic policy of President Putin, we support him in those activities that are aimed at restoring what has been destroyed by the enemies of the Soviet people during the Gorbachev-Yeltsin disaster and its aftermath.
We support him in restoring the armed might of Russia, devastated by the collapse of the Soviet economy which benefitted the United States. We support him in the revival of agriculture policy. We support him in the import-substitution policy, leading to the restoration of Russian industrial production. We support him in all that relates to the growth of Russia's sovereignty and its national dignity. But on the path of successful implementation of these noble tasks is the capitalist economic system. The most effective of these objectives can be achieved only under socialism, which is confirmed by the phenomenal success of the Soviet economy under Stalin, which has not yet been achieved by any of the capitalist countries in the world.
We do not support the ongoing orgy of anti-Stalinism in favour of "former", "offended" by Soviet power. And because we are categorically opposed to the erection of a memorial in Moscow (or any where else) in the memory "to the victims of political repression" - "Wall of Sorrow" (Putin's decree of 09.30.2015). We do not support the universal chatter of liberal leaders and in the media about that the Great Patriotic War was won by the people and NOT the leadership of J.V. Stalin. Then what is the role of the President of the Russian Federation in the current events taking place in Syria? Zero? Or even negative?
We do not support the universal weeping over bloody Nicholas II, encouraging the so-called pogroms by the "Black Hundreds" and voluntarily abdicating. We do not support the rituals of funerals of unknown whose bones in the Peter and Paul Cathedral in St. Petersburg.
We do not support the president in the connivance of bishops of the church, occupying portions of protected areas and are building around the temples in a quantity not required by people and to the detriment of the local environment and contrary to the laws of architecture, urban planning. Positioning Russia as a secular state, the president distorts the concept, pursuing a policy of promoting religious ideology and propaganda all around and out of place.
We do not support the policy of the Central Bank, working against Russia for the US economy and thus provides ease of maintenance of certain US financial institutions and robbing our people of our state.
We do not support the presence of an increasing number of private (commercial) banks making a living by robbing those who are forced to take out loans at exorbitant interest rates and filling by the state of the national budget the "losses" of profits of the banks at the expense of further inflation. A single Russian State Savings Bank is enough for the Russian Federation.
We do not support the favour of the president to currency speculators, making it an extremely profitable "business" in line with the progressive impoverishment of the people. In this regard, the president acts against the people.
We do not support the rejection of the nationalization of major historical public sectors of the economy, first of all - electric power which was integral to the USSR and to ensure the transfer of power from one time zone to another with a cost-effective factor of its use.
We do not support the rejection of the nationalization of the main means of transportation - air and rail transport, which have become a lucrative business for the post-perestroika crooks and theft of public money from the budget.
Vladimir Putin is a president of a bourgeois state, and because of his status, he protects the interests of the economically ruling class - the bourgeoisie.
In summary, we can say that we support the bourgeois president in the issues and actions that are in the external and the internal policy, aimed at strengthening sovereignty and power of Russia, the growth of its national dignity.
However, we remain bitter rivals of the bourgeois order in Russia.
The conclusion of Marx, is that communism is the future of humanity, and defines the strategic policy of the AUCPB – To working towards socialism! (Lenin). And this is precisely the historical mission of Russia – to go ahead of the rest across the whole planet.

General Secretary of the CC AUCPB
October 11 2015.

Before the "Calibers" volley, made by the Caspian Flotilla, Washington was convinced that Russia was not able to effectively oppose US military action without the use of nuclear weapons. This, in fact, was based on American audacity in foreign policy.
Russia has demonstrated its full air hammer complex in which an airplane and its pilot are important and the most visible, but just one of many parts of ensuring the effective destruction of the enemy and their own security.
But the same group of Russian air force in Syria is too small, the opponent does not have a complete modern system of air defence, and aviation by Western countries does not oppose the Russian air force, and therefore to talk of complete superiority over the potential enemy in the aviation component is not necessary - there is not enough material for comparison.
But in regard to the naval component, on the 7th of October, one Caspian Flotilla, with one volley of 26 "Caliber" missiles against Islamic State bases in Syria for a long time (and in its present form forever) removed the US Navy from the open seas, the real factor that can provide a so-called projection of force (formerly called the "gunboat diplomacy").
That is, the Caspian Flotilla and the Black Sea Fleet is capable by not leaving their waters, of destroying any enemy in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Persian Gulf, and the Baltic Fleet able to keep covered the North Sea, English Channel and part of the Norwegian Sea. Taking into account the possibility of the Northern Fleet to monitor the North Atlantic due to the reach of the enemy, and a similar opportunity by the Pacific Fleet to drown all that floats in the Pacific Ocean north of Hawaii, the US Navy was unable to project a threat to the coast of Eurasia.
Since the missile salvo can be completely invisible to ships near the marine area with a distance of thousands of kilometres, American sailors will see rockets only at the moment of contact with their ship or on approach. They just do not have time to take effective measures for self-defence.
Thus, sharply reduced is the number of missiles in a salvo necessary to destroy the aircraft strike groups (ASG-s). This eliminates the need to use big surface ships in the Russian Fleet at a distance for effective retaliation. The United States simply can not follow each patrol, catching poachers in the Okhotsk and Caspian Seas (but capable of suddenly sinking an American aircraft carrier, peacefully grazing in three seas from this inconspicuous boat).
Until October 7, Washington was convinced that Russia was not able to effectively oppose US military action without the use of nuclear weapons. This, in fact, was based on American audacity in international politics.
Americans do not hide the fact that they use force, when they want to, simply because they think no one is able to adequately respond to them with conventional weapons, and Russia will not to start a nuclear war, either because of Iraq or because of Syria, or even because of Ukraine. They are like a cheeky teenager used to everyone in their company being weaker and start conflict on the principle: "Have a go, if you can," in full confidence that no one can. And suddenly, now it becomes clear that they can. Russia can.
The Americans have found themselves in an extremely difficult situation. The whole policy of recent years was based on the fact that at the critical moment, Washington is able to use force with relative impunity. Now it has become clear that they cannot.
Moreover, as demonstrated by projecting the fleet possibilities in aviation, the generals of the Pentagon have calculated that the Russian Air force is able to shoot targets in the United States without leaving Russian airspace. America for the first time in the history is feeling defenceless against conventional (non-nuclear) weapons.
But the most dangerous thing for the US is not that Russia has the ability to cover their territory and the territory of its allies in Eurasia of the US Navy, which has now become pointless burden for taxpayers (which, essentially is eliminated as a military and political argument). And not even the fact that Moscow may, if desired, shoot at the US with conventional weapons from a safe distance (just like the United States on Iraq).
The most important thing is that the US allies understand this. And most of them have long been faithful to the world hegemon only out of fear of its military capabilities, from which (in their opinion) no one is safe from. On October 7, Russia has shown that it can. It has fundamentally changed the entire military-political situation in the world.
Of course, the American allies and coalitions will fall apart immediately, but the US will now find it much more difficult to just command the allies, without taking into account their interests. Partners now have someone to go to. Washington would have to persuade and negotiate. Americans have long forgotten how to do it. Resources for the satisfaction of allies are not envisage. Yes, and the arguments of the United States are weak. If you believe Obama, the United States is the best because it is the best, and they all have to follow, because they have to.
This argument was valid till 7th October 2015. Today the situation has changed.
By Rostislav Ishchenko,
President of the Centre of System Analysis and Forecasting

Another presidential election by decree of the Belarusian parliament was scheduled for 11 October 2015. In Belarus, for 21 years has been incumbant president, Alexander Lukashenko, who has four times won the presidential elections: in 1994, 2001, 2006 and 2010, respectively. In the history of the bourgeois Republic of Belarus, which was formed as a result of the counter-revolutionary coup in 1991, this is the fifth presidential election. The restriction previously held in the Belarusian Constitution, article 81 of which stated: "The same person can not be president more than two terms," was excluded from it as a result of the national referendum in 2004, the results of which the pro-Western opposition is still contesting.
The current election campaign takes place in a difficult political and economic situation: the bourgeois Republic of Belarus, formed by the counter-revolutionary coup of 1991, when a great power, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, was destroyed, like many other bourgeois countries, is making desperate and unsuccessful attempts to cope with the consequences of the economic crisis that hit the entire capitalist world.
From now on all the former Soviet republics, which became bourgeois states have been drawn into the orbit of the activities of world imperialism. But the crisis like around 100 years ago, were proved by V.I. Lenin to be the constant companions of imperialism. This is confirmed today.
The contradictions within the imperialist world and the crises lead to both local and global and wars for markets, for the seizure of foreign territories, for world domination. The essence of the aggravation of the crisis of modern imperialism is that the United States, the main imperialist power - is gradually losing its hegemony in the world. But Ziono-American circles do not want this, and in their quest for world domination, they have enmeshed the planet and their military bases around the world unleashing a chain of "color revolutions" and local wars.
On the path of US imperialism towards world domination now stands Russia. The ultimate goal of the Ziono-American circles is the destruction of Russia as an independent state and dismembering her into several enclaves.
In order to establish full control over the former Soviet republic and the creation of a base for an attack on Russia, the United States and other Western countries organized a coup in Ukraine in February 2014, as a result of which came to power there neo-banderov - frankly pro-fascist forces and unleashed a civil fratricidal war in Donbass.
Similar plans are held by the imperialist countries of the West also against Belarus. Their policy towards the Belarusian state also does not shine with originality. They are ready to go to war in our country, and they are noth bothered about Belarusian blood. They are helped in this by "the fifth column" which unfortunately, Belarus also has.
The last attempt to seize power by force puppets of the West (spiritual brothers of the Ukrainian neo-banderovs) took place on 19 December 2010 at the end of the penultimate presidential elections, when instigated by militant opposition leaders, the crowd went to Independence Square and tried to break into the Government House. However, at that time, the provocation failed miserably: the crowd was dispersed by Belarusian riot police, and some opposition leaders finished up in the dock.
* * *
Bourgeois power, as in previous election campaigns, strongly calls upon all citizens of Belarus to take part in the presidential elections, echoed by the vast majority of Belarusian political parties, including the Left, inspiring working people with the thought that with the help of elections, they can change their lives for the better.
The position of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks is unchanging: with the help of election ballots, the power of the bourgeoisie can not be torn away from them. Never in history has there been such that the bourgeoisie voluntarily surrendered power and the stolen wealth over to the working people. This is out of the question. The real president in a bourgeois state is capital, who hires whoever it desires into power. And whoever wins this election campaign under the domination of the bourgeoisie, in any country, including Belarus (Ivanov, Petrov or Sidorov), the capitalist socio-political system will remain unchanged. This is confirmed not only by the entire previous history of the world, but the 24-year history of the former Soviet Union. Only the names and some elements of government policy actually change, but the capitalist foundation of the state, private ownership of the means of production, the capitalist market economy and the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, perhaps even in the form of bourgeois democracy, are preserved.
A vivid example of the above are the latest developments in Ukraine, where under the flag of the struggle against the domination of the oligarchs, led by then-President Yanukovych, the neo-banderovs were able to raise protests from the masses of people, and a coup, displacing the incumbent president. Currently, however, many Ukrainians are bitterly aware that after the revolution came to power in the face of other oligarchs the new president of Poroshenko - the "chocolate king", I. Kolomoisky, occupying the 2nd place in the ranking of the richest people of Ukraine (financing the nazi paramilitary formations, who are fighting in the Donbass), and others. The new company of oligarchs in power suppress the protests of workers in an even more sophisticated and cruel manner than the previous one, demonstrating to the working people, why a fascist dictatorship was introduced.
This experience and the experience of other countries once again convinces the workers that whatever the result of the election, the main contradiction of capitalism is preserved between the social character of production and the private capitalist form of appropriation of social labor. Hence always follows the evils of capitalism: a steady increase in income differences of the exploiting minority and the exploited majority, the impoverishment of the workers and the uncertainty of the future in view of the constant threat of unemployment and social insecurity. For example, the contract system of employment of workers in Belarus has transformed them into absolutely powerless slaves.
The current practice of political struggle clearly confirms the truly prophetic words of V.I. Lenin: "... The proletariat can not win without winning over the majority of the population. But to limit or determine this by the winning of the majority of votes in elections under the rule of the bourgeoisie, is an impassable blockhead or just a mockery over the workers "(Full. Cit. Op., T.40, p. 14).
As a consistent supporter of the teachings of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin, the AUCPB, unlike other so-called communist parties, since its inception, advocates the revolutionary form of struggle against capital. The Bolsheviks of Belarus during the years of the bourgeois restoration true to this line also say: the power of the bourgeoisie can only snatched away in a revolutionary way, through socialist revolution. In addition, the Bolsheviks as the most consistent conductors of communist ideology, have always opposed and still oppose the presidential form of government of the bourgeois institution of power, and believe that the best president for the working people is Soviet power - the dictatorship of the proletariat in alliance with the peasantry and the working intelligentsia, which is necessary fight for. Therefore, any elections in the bourgeois system of government should be regarded as an another withdrawal of workers away from class struggle, another campaign by capital to dupe the masses in order to prolong its existence.
As part of this campaign, the Belarusian state media are constantly trying to convince the public both inside the republic and outside it, that the economy of our country is at the service of the working people, ordinary people. It is emphasized that in Belarus a large piece of property is in the hands of the state and not stolen by the oligarchs, as is the case of Russia. However, according to the Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Belarus, 62.7% of industrial output in the country is produced in private enterprises, including foreign-owned ones. And this percentage from year to year is constantly increasing, that is, everything goes according to Lenin: private property every minute every second generates another private property. It should be added that in some industries this percentage is even higher: 94.4% in the fuel industry, light industry 80.8%, food 79.9%, building materials industry 63.4%. It is particularly important to note that trade in the country is mainly concentrated in private hands: 81.9% of retail trade turnover falls on private trade. In Belarus there are now all the components of the capitalist market: the market of means of production, capital market and securities, labour market and the market for articles of personal consumption. As for state-owned enterprises, they have long been working under the laws of the capitalist market and are involved in business on a par with private enterprises, i.e. they are state capitalist property. The situation is similar in agriculture.
As you can see from the above, our Republic of Belarus is an ordinary bourgeois state, headed by the president of the bourgeois. The prevailing type of economic relations in the Republic of Belarus, the Belarusian authorities promote as a special "Belarusian model" of the economy, but from a Marxist-Leninist point of view this model is nothing new and bears and is characterized as state capitalism, which every year is getting closer to the usual form of capitalism with a predominance of private property. There is no so-called "Belarusian miracle". Although the figures of the Belarusian economy are among the highest in the former Soviet Union, nothing compares to the Soviet growth rate. The real miracle (the so-called the "Russian miracle") was demonstrated to the world the Soviet socialist economy under Stalin, its growth rate still remains unsurpassed: the growth rate of the economy of the capitalist Japan (called in the 70s, "the Japanese miracle") and capitalized economy of modern China in 2.5 times lower than Stalin. Also known from recent history: the success of the bourgeois economy are of a temporary nature, the surge in growth, even relatively long, as a rule, should decline.
* * *
On 17 and 20 July at the meetings of the Central Election Commission the decision was made to register 8 initiative groups to nominate candidates for the presidency of Belarus: Alexander Lukashenko, Sergei Kalyakin, Sergei Haidukevich, Viktor Tereshchenko, Nicholas Ulakhovich, Jeanne Romanovsky, Tatyana Karatkevich and Anatoly Lebedko.
The alignment of political forces Belarus is determined in accordance with the economic interests of the various groups and strata of Belarusian society. In recent years, the struggle in the elections in Belarus are among the political currents of two main directions. Some defend the interests of the national bourgeoisie which are parties and policies oriented towards the current government, including the Communist Party of Belarus (KPB leader Karpenko), which decided not to nominate its candidate and fully focus its work on campaigning for Lukashenko, others are working in the interests of selling out which is the comprador bourgeoisie and policies oriented to the West, and the nationalist-leaning politicians. None of the political parties, and no politician, participating in elections, defend the interests of the workers, peasants and intellectuals, as under the domination by bourgeoisie parliamentary methods this cannot be done.
The national bourgeoisie gets profits mainly at the expense of its own production, and the spokesman of it interests in Belarus is the current President Alexander Lukashenko. His administration mainly emphasises capitalist integration with Russia, thus ensuring the free movement of capital, labour, goods, services, the creation of new financial and industrial groups, the increase in markets and, as a consequence, the revival of national industry, and hence increase the ultimate goal of any profits of capitalist production. However, it should be noted that if in the recent past a significant part of our economy has been focused on Russia, at the present time, as a result of the expulsion of Belarus from the sphere of the Russian market, the Belarusian economy is becoming increasingly "multi-vector" in nature. The West took advantage of the situation and abandoned the policy of harsh confrontation with Belarus then began steps to gradually retract it into its sphere of influence, still placing as the strategic goal - to isolate the former Soviet republics from Russia, and to prevent the formation of a union on the former USSR.
Unfortunately, the integration of Belarus and Russia has encountered problems whose solution is delayed. It has been 15 years since the signing of the Treaty establishing the Union State, but now we have to admit: in the question of unification of currency systems and the adoption of the Constitutional Act, referred to in the Agreement, we have not moved forward. You do not have enough of the main thing – the political will of Russia and Belarus, including Alexander Lukashenko.
Recently, in connection with the events in Ukraine, in the statements and actions of Alexander Lukashenko were certain contradictions and inconsistencies. For example, in fact, recognizing the Crimea in Russia, and later answering Ukrainian program "Shuster LIVE” he reproachfully said that the Ukrainian government and the Ukrainian military themselves have handed over the peninsula, and at the same time asked the question: "Why did you not protect your land?" It is not clear what lies in such arguments? Would it not be better if the Ukrainian military had fired at Russia and unleashed a war on the peninsula? Is that what he is saying?
Many people in Belarus were perplexed at the recognition by Alexander Lukashenko of Acting President of Ukraine Alexander Turchinov, who came to power in a coup. By order of Alexander Turchinov began military operations in the south-east of Ukraine, which killed plenty of civilians in the region. The same applies to Poroshenko, the legitimacy of the election for the presidency of Ukraine have raised doubts by many observers. He promised to end the war in the Donbass, however there is military action, and the policy of outright genocide intensified.
This position was condemned many people in Belarus, first of all, war and labour veterans, who know firsthand what fascism is. Such a controversial tactic is not conducive to the strengthening of friendly relations with Russia.
With regard to the comprador bourgeoisie, it receives its income through the sale of imported goods, attracting foreign capital, and with it exploiting their workers, it is in politics relying on the openly pro-Western most reactionary forces who, acting under the slogan of bourgeois nationalism, in effect they are anti-national, collaborationist. They belong to the nationalist parties such as the Belarusian Popular Front, the United Civic Party, Belarusian Social Democratic Party "(Narodnaya Hramada"), and others. Despite all efforts, they failed to nominate a single candidate.
There have been attempts by some opposition leaders to gather signatures for nomination as a candidate in the presidential candidate of Belarus Nikolai Statkevich – a fanatical nationalist and Russophobe rightly convicted for openly aggressive acts and incitement to revolution in December 2010. And his threats against the incumbent president during a televised debate on the eve of the election were so boorish that in America, where the opposition is often cited as an example of "civilization", he would be placed in handcuffs when leaving the TV studio, without waiting for him to lead a crowd of supporters to Independence Square to beat the doors of Government House. However, the CEC rejected this venture with the registration of the N. Statkevich group because according to the law, a prisoner has no right to stand as a candidate in any election.
The Belarusian party of leftists “A Just World" (formerly the Party of Communists of Belarus, chairman of S. Kalyakin), is also actively involved in the activities of the pro-Western opposition, since May 2007 the leader of the party "A Just World "- co-chair of the Political Council of the United 'Democratic Forces" (UDF). But in this election campaign, S. Kalyakin, as well as other candidates from the opposition, participates as an independent representative, placing hope only on his own team.
So meanwhile, four teams from the pro-Western opposition candidates in the presidential elections are going on their own, each acting on its own.
Note: there is no doubt that the West, placing under its influence the Baltic republics, Moldova, Georgia, Ukraine, will not leave Belarus alone. Knowing about the aggressiveness and assertiveness of the structures of the West, one must be prepared to see the use of force by it in order to seize power in Belarus despite the defeat in December 2010. However today, after the bloody Kiev Maidan, the Belerus opposition leaders meanwhile are not daring to openly call people onto the Square. But in the opposition newspaper mouthpiece "Narodnaya Volya", the instigators of the crowds during the events entitled the "Square" are still lauded as heroes. The same newspaper published an article with the demand to demolish the monument to V.I. Lenin at the Government House, and replace the current national flag of the Belarus Republic adopted by national referendum, with the "white-red- white" flag, which during the years of Nazi occupation, was used by the pro-Nazi Belarusian Central Rada. Particularly intensified is the glorification of the Kiev Maidan and its "heroes". A significant place in the newspaper was given to anti-Russian and anti-Russian articles, while at the same referendum, the people of Belarus clearly called for the strengthening of relations with Russia. That is, these articles are essentially anti-peoples, anti-Belarusian. It is not clear as to where the Belarusian authorities are looking? Such publications should be shut down.
And yet, with all of the above problems, it should be recognized that currently, the rating of the current president in the country far exceeds the rating of all other contenders for power put together. Of course, such authority of the acting bourgeois power was created with the help of administrative resources: the Belarusian state media from morning to night broadcast about the socially-oriented economy of the bourgeois Republic of Belarus, and says nothing here about the constantly rising prices, even for essential commodities, more expensive food, medicine, utilities, public transportation, more on the basis of transition paid health care and education. These "achievements" are indirectly reflected in the following fact: during the construction of the bourgeois structures, the population of Belarus decreased from 10 million 210 thousand people in 1994 to 9 million 485.3 thousand people in July 2015.
Based on the foregoing, the Bureau of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks for Belarus and the Kaliningrad region decided NOT TO PARTICIPATE in the elections to the President of Republic of Belarus, which are inherently ELECTIONS WITHOUT A CHOICE.
In the course of the election campaign, AUCPB party organizations in Belarus set the task:
1. To explain to the citizens of Belarus the Bolshevik position on the presidential elections at this stage. It should use the campaign to promote the party's position on issues of power and class struggle, promote the Bolshevik idea of the necessity of the revolutionary overthrow of the unjust capitalist system and restore the most progressive socialist society, to expose the presidency as a bourgeois, anti-national institution of power, as well as myths about the possibility of choosing a "good" president, to improve the lives of workers.
2. Every Communist-Bolshevik is to set a specific target for the dissemination of the Bolshevik press among the working people of Belarus, making the most of every opportunity to participate in election meetings, pickets, rallies.
3. Bear in mind that active Bolshevik work among the masses in the course of this election campaign should contribute to deconstructing the illusions of working people about improvement in their lives under capitalism. In addition, the campaign should be used to gain experience of political work among the masses, strengthen the Party ranks and raise the profile of the Bolshevik organizations among the workers, peasants and intellectuals.
4. In the case of a second round of presidential elections and the emergence of the real danger of a victory by the pro-Western candidate, then we should participate in the elections and lead a very active campaign "AGAINST" the given candidate, to avoid the legal seizure of power in Belarus by a puppet of the West.
With this, the AUCPB Bureau of the Central Committee for Belarus and the Kaliningrad region encourages working people of Belarus:
1. To remain vigilant against reactionary political forces supported by Western sponsors seeking and not really hoping for a victory in elections, to carry out in our country a violent fascist coup similarly to the one carried out by the neo-banderovs in Ukraine in February 2014 with the support of the imperialist circles of the West, primarily the United States.
2 . Continuing the line of the unity of action of all left-wing forces to create an anti-imperialist and anti-fascist front of the working people of Belarus.
3. To actively support the integration of Belarus with Russia and other republics of the former Soviet Union in the framework of the Union State of Russia and Belarus, the Eurasian Economic Community (EAEC), and others as this integration facilitates the unification of working people in the struggle against capitalism.
3. Tear up all the attempts of the Belarusian pro-Western nationalist organizations to destabilize the situation in the republic and establishing a violent terrorist dictatorship in Belarus, controlled by the imperialists of Western countries led by the United States.
4. Step up the fight for the restoration of Soviet power - the power of the workers, peasants and intellectuals, socialism and the great state - the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
We Bolsheviks are certain that only the class struggle, leading to the dictatorship of the proletariat, will allow workers to throw off the shackles of capitalist slavery and open up for them the way to a brighter future towards socialism and communism.
(Note by FB-AUCPB - Alexander Lukashenko secured 83.47% of the vote with voter turnout at 87.22% at the 11 October 2015 presidential election).
Minsk, August 1, 2015


By New Worker correspondent
THE people of Democratic Korea celebrated the 70th anniversary of the Workers Party of Korea in style with a massive military parade through Kim Il Sung Square in Pyongyang on 10th October. And throughout the world communists joined them at events to mark the foundation of the party that has led the Korean revolution to victory after victory in the decades that followed.
London was no exception, with a number of meetings and events that concluded with a reception at the DPR Korea embassy last week. Tributes to sacrifice and steadfastness of the Korean communists who transformed the liberated north of the Korean peninsula into a workers’ paradise were made by Daphne Liddle from the New Communist Party and Michael Chant from the Revolutionary Communist Party of Britain (ML) along with others from the Korean Friendship Association, Socialist Labour Party and the CPGB (ML).
The Workers’ Party of Korea was founded on 10th October 1945 by great leader Kim Il Sung. Since its birth the WPK has led the Korean revolution and socialist construction, performing tremendous feats of socialist construction in defiance of US aggression and imperialist blockade. Dear leader Kim Jong Il carried on the work to overcome imperialist blockade and natural disasters, to make the DPRK a nuclear power and raise living standards to even new heights. Now under the guidance of the respected leader Kim Jong Un, the WPK is leading the drive to build a thriving and prosperous socialist republic.

Posted by london communists


By New Worker Correspondent
Korean solidarity activists celebrated the 70th anniversary of the founding of the Workers Party of Korea on Saturday 3rd October at a meeting organised by Juche Idea Study Group and the Korean Friendship Association (KFA). New Communist Party comrades, including general secretary Andy Brooks and Central Committee member Daphne Liddle, joined supporters of the Korean revolution in marking this important date in the Korean calendar at a hall in central London last weekend.
Keynote speakers Dermot Hudson, Shaun Pickford and Thae Yong Ho from the London embassy of the DPR Korea, outlined the fighting history of the Korean communist movement supported by others including NCP leader Andy Brooks, Alex Meads and David Munoz on different aspects of the Korean revolution.
The WPK was founded on 10th October 1945 by great leader Kim Il Sung. Since its birth the WPK has led the Korean revolution and socialist construction, performing tremendous feats. Under the guidance of the respected leader Kim Jong Un, the WPK is now leading the drive to build a thriving and impregnable socialist country.
Dermot Hudson said: "The Workers' Party of Korea which was, 70 years ago, founded on October 10th originally as the Communist Party of North Korea by the great leader comrade Kim Il Sung and is led today by the great leader comrade Kim Jong Un is a Juche type party totally different to both bourgeois parties such as Tory and New Labour and also to the former ruling parties of the socialist countries.
“It is different because it is rooted the popular masses. It was not formed as a result of a sudden decision but its formation was a process that actually spanned several decades starting with the formation of the Down with Imperialism Union on October 17th 1926 by the great leader comrade Kim Il Sung. Indeed the process did not come to an end on October 10th 1945 but a further merger of parties took place in 1946 between the Communist Party of North Korea and the New Democratic Party to form the Workers' Party of North Korea. This prevented the forces of the working masses being split.
“In 1949 the Workers' Party of North Korea merged with the Workers' Party of South Korea to form a unified party for the whole of Korea the Workers Party of Korea. Indeed the road travelled by the Workers' Party of Korea since October 10th 1945 has been one of continuous struggle, development and consolidation....
“The WPK is proudly known throughout the world, from Sao Paulo to Vladivostok, for its struggle for socialism and its anti-US, anti-imperialist struggle. It is known as an invincible iron-willed party of Juche! Under the leadership of dear respected Marshal Kim Jong Un the WPK is continuing the anti-imperialist and anti-revisionist traditions of the Workers’ Party of Korea”.
NCP leader Andy Brooks said: "The Workers' Party of Korea has led the Korean revolution performing tremendous feats in socialist construction, defeating US imperialism, beating the US-led economic blockade and overcoming natural disasters to become a nuclear power and a modern socialist society that serves the people throughout their lives. The revolutionary struggle was led by the great leader comrade Kim Il Sung and dear leader comrade Kim Jong Il . Today leader Kim Jong Un follows their footsteps at the helm of the party ".
Alex Meads spoke on the foreign policy of the Workers' Party of Korea . He explained that the WPK and DPRK's foreign policy is based on independence, peace and friendship . He praised the DPRK 's noble proletarian internationalist assistance to Cuba and Vietnam in their struggle against US imperialism . He said that the foreign relations of the WPK are rapidly expanding.
This was taken up by David Munoz who thanked the Workers' Party of Korea for its contribution to the world communist movement and said that the WPK is the vanguard of the world communist movement.
After the speeches everyone joined the Korean comrades for a party to celebrate the foundation of the WPK and everyone thought it was an afternoon well-spent at the Chadswell Centre in central London.
The UK Korean Friendship Association (KFA) organises solidarity meetings and protest pickets in London throughout the year. The KFA also works side by side with the Friends of Korea committee which also holds regular events in the capital.
Posted by london communists


http://www.uk-songun.com/index.php email juche007@yahoo.co.uk
London 24th of November Juche 104(2015)
The Association For the Study of Songun Politics UK(ASSPUK), the Juche Idea Study Group of England(JISGE) and the UK Korean Friendship Association(UK KFA) today issued a joint statement in support of the statement of the Policy Department of the National Defence Commission of the Democratic People's Republic of the 24th of November;
Yesterday was the 5th anniversary of the Yonghyong firing incident . The south Korean puppets committed the reckless and base act of staging a live firing drill in the waters around the five islands in the West Sea,an area of extreme tension where the socialist DPRK and fascist south Korea confront each other at gunpoint , an area where there have been many armed clashes claiming casualties. Despite the history of the area and the warnings of the KPA Southwestern front command the puppets went ahead with live firing .
Worse still the south Korean puppets staged a so-called "memorial service " at which they blatantly refused to accept responsiblity for having provoked the
Yongphyong Incident in the first place. They even tried to present as a victory when the world knows that it was a grave defeat for them and at the time they ran around like frightened rats.
The grossly provocative act of defacing the DPRK National Flag was carried out by ultra-fascist hooligans and scum in Seoul as well as the act of insulting the Supreme leadership of the DPRK. The south Korean puppets should be made to pay dearly for these acts.
The stance of the Policy Department of the DPRK NDC is a correct one. The south Korean puppets are not heeding the letter or the spirit of the agreements reached in August but are persisting in extreme anti- DPRK provocations and warmongering thus it will become impossible to solve any problems through dialogue and negotiation.
If the south Korean authorities truly value peace and reconciliation then they need to change course at once !